eBay Inc.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, WMT.SW has a market cap of 1.45T. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while WMT.SW trades at $107.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas WMT.SW's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WMT.SW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW and WMT.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, BABA.SW has a market cap of 165.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while BABA.SW trades at $166.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas BABA.SW's P/E ratio is 97.08. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BABA.SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW is less volatile compared to BABA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBAY.SW.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, ZAL.SW has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while ZAL.SW trades at $42.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas ZAL.SW's P/E ratio is 80.88. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZAL.SW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW and ZAL.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, AVOL.SW has a market cap of 5.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while AVOL.SW trades at $40.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas AVOL.SW's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AVOL.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW is less volatile compared to AVOL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBAY.SW.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, DUFN.SW has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while DUFN.SW trades at $30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas DUFN.SW's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DUFN.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW is less volatile compared to DUFN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBAY.SW.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, CEC.SW has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while CEC.SW trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas CEC.SW's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CEC.SW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EBAY.SW has daily volatility of 0.00 and CEC.SW has daily volatility of N/A.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, VALN.SW has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while VALN.SW trades at $259.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas VALN.SW's P/E ratio is 169.61. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VALN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW is less volatile compared to VALN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBAY.SW.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, ZO1.SW has a market cap of 766.02M. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while ZO1.SW trades at $105.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas ZO1.SW's P/E ratio is -46.79. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZO1.SW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW and ZO1.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, MOZN.SW has a market cap of 490.28M. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while MOZN.SW trades at $11.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas MOZN.SW's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MOZN.SW's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EBAY.SW is less volatile compared to MOZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EBAY.SW.

EBAY.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EBAY.SW stands at 23.31B. In comparison, SNH.SW has a market cap of 374.14M. Regarding current trading prices, EBAY.SW is priced at $39.53, while SNH.SW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EBAY.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -18.47, whereas SNH.SW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, EBAY.SW's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNH.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. EBAY.SW has daily volatility of 0.00 and SNH.SW has daily volatility of N/A.