Davis Commodities Limited Ordinary Shares
Davis Commodities Limited Ordinary Shares DTCK Peers
See (DTCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTCK | $0.70 | -0.03% | 17.2M | -5.00 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| ADM | $48.70 | +1.67% | 23.4B | 17.15 | $2.84 | +4.15% |
| TSN | $55.70 | +0.80% | 19.5B | 21.67 | $2.57 | +3.57% |
| BG | $76.04 | +1.83% | 10.2B | 9.76 | $7.79 | +3.60% |
| SFD | $23.34 | +1.15% | 9.2B | 10.28 | $2.27 | +2.14% |
| CALM | $96.10 | -1.49% | 4.7B | 4.75 | $20.24 | +6.94% |
| AGRO | $9.27 | +1.31% | 4.6B | 10.30 | $0.90 | +3.78% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
| FDP | $32.32 | -1.34% | 1.5B | 10.60 | $3.05 | +3.40% |
| VITL | $32.65 | +3.59% | 1.5B | 28.89 | $1.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DTCK vs ADM Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while ADM trades at $48.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs TSN Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while TSN trades at $55.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs BG Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while BG trades at $76.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs SFD Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while SFD trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs CALM Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while CALM trades at $96.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AGRO Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AGRO trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs IBA Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs FDP Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while FDP trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs VITL Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while VITL trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs DOLE Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while DOLE trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs LND Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while LND trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs CHSCP Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while CHSCP trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs CHSCL Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while CHSCL trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs CHSCN Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while CHSCN trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs CHSCM Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 338.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while CHSCM trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs CHSCO Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while CHSCO trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs LMNR Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while LMNR trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -127.38. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LMNR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs ALCO Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while ALCO trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AFRI Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 211.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AFRI trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AGFS Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs VFF Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while VFF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs PME Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs LOCL Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while LOCL trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AFRIW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AFRIW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -19.57. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs SANW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while SANW trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs APPH Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs APPHW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs SDOT Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while SDOT trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs EDBL Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while EDBL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs EDBLW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while EDBLW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AGRI Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AGRI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AQB Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AQB trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AQB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs KALWW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs KAL Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AAGR Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 578.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AAGRW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 578.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.
DTCK vs AGRIW Comparison
DTCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DTCK stands at 17.2M. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, DTCK is priced at $0.70, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DTCK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DTCK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DTCK is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DTCK.