Dakota Gold Corp. WT
Dakota Gold Corp. WT DC-WT Peers
See (DC-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC-WT | $1.70 | -6.68% | 190M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NEM | $58.24 | -0.03% | 64.8B | 13.27 | $4.39 | +1.71% |
| AEM | $121.00 | -1.35% | 61.2B | 25.74 | $4.70 | +1.32% |
| WPM | $89.14 | -2.12% | 40.5B | 65.07 | $1.37 | +0.53% |
| GOLD | $21.13 | -0.28% | 36.3B | 17.32 | $1.22 | +1.89% |
| FNV | $165.81 | -1.43% | 31.9B | 51.65 | $3.21 | +0.89% |
| AU | $47.95 | -0.35% | 24.1B | 22.00 | $2.18 | +0.72% |
| GFI | $24.38 | +0.25% | 21.8B | 17.67 | $1.38 | +2.24% |
| KGC | $15.48 | -0.29% | 19B | 15.79 | $0.98 | +0.77% |
| RGLD | $179.40 | +0.15% | 11.8B | 29.75 | $6.03 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
DC-WT vs NEM Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while NEM trades at $58.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs AEM Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while AEM trades at $121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs WPM Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while WPM trades at $89.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 65.07. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GOLD Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GOLD trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs FNV Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while FNV trades at $165.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 51.65. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs AU Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while AU trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GFI Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GFI trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs KGC Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while KGC trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs RGLD Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while RGLD trades at $179.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs AGI Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while AGI trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HMY Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HMY trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs CDE Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while CDE trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs AUY Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs SBSW Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while SBSW trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs OR Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while OR trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 151.71. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs BTG Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while BTG trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs EGO Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while EGO trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs IAG Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while IAG trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs NGD Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while NGD trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HL-PB Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HL-PB trades at $51.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1729.67. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HL Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HL trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs ORLA Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while ORLA trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs EQX Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while EQX trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs SAND Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while SAND trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 91.35. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs SSRM Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while SSRM trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs NG Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while NG trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs CGAU Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while CGAU trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs SA Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while SA trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -132.36. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs ARMN Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while ARMN trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs DRD Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while DRD trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs CNL Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 827.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while CNL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -20.31. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs IAUX Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while IAUX trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GSS Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs DC Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while DC trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs CMCL Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 357.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while CMCL trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GAU Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 349M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GAU trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -19.36. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs NFGC Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while NFGC trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs ODV Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while ODV trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs CTGO Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 252.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while CTGO trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs IDR Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while IDR trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs THM Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 177.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while THM trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -42.76. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs USAU Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while USAU trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GSV Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GLDG Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GLDG trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HYMC Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HYMC trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs VGZ Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while VGZ trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs TRX Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while TRX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.48. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GORO Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GORO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs NVAWW Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while NVAWW trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs PZG Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while PZG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs ODVWZ Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while ODVWZ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs AAU Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs AUST Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while AUST trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HYMCL Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 412.2K. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HYMCW Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs KL Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs PVG Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs GPL Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.
DC-WT vs HYMCZ Comparison
DC-WT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DC-WT stands at 190M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DC-WT is priced at $1.70, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DC-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DC-WT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, DC-WT is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DC-WT.