Dabur India Limited
Dabur India Limited (DABUR.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DABUR.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DABUR.NS | ₹447.20 | +0.08% | 800B | 42.39 | ₹10.64 | +1.77% |
| HINDUNILVR.NS | ₹2,196.50 | +0.80% | 5.2T | 48.66 | ₹45.29 | +1.95% |
| HINDUNILVR.BO | ₹2,197.45 | +0.86% | 5.2T | 47.62 | ₹46.24 | +1.95% |
| MARICO.NS | ₹823.35 | -1.02% | 1.1T | 60.71 | ₹13.58 | +0.85% |
| MARICO.BO | ₹824.40 | -0.88% | 1.1T | 62.47 | ₹13.20 | +0.85% |
| GODREJCP.BO | ₹1,022.40 | +0.46% | 1.1T | 57.74 | ₹17.81 | +1.95% |
| GODREJCP.NS | ₹1,020.40 | +0.30% | 1.1T | 56.43 | ₹18.21 | +1.95% |
| DABUR.BO | ₹447.15 | +0.13% | 800.4B | 43.51 | ₹10.37 | +1.77% |
| COLPAL.BO | ₹2,095.80 | -3.17% | 586.8B | 44.14 | ₹48.88 | +2.36% |
| COLPAL.NS | ₹2,097.00 | -3.14% | 586.6B | 44.28 | ₹48.71 | +2.36% |
Stock Comparison
DABUR.NS vs HINDUNILVR.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, HINDUNILVR.NS has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while HINDUNILVR.NS trades at ₹2,196.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas HINDUNILVR.NS's P/E ratio is 48.66. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDUNILVR.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to HINDUNILVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check HINDUNILVR.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs HINDUNILVR.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, HINDUNILVR.BO has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while HINDUNILVR.BO trades at ₹2,197.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas HINDUNILVR.BO's P/E ratio is 47.62. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDUNILVR.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to HINDUNILVR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check HINDUNILVR.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs MARICO.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, MARICO.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while MARICO.NS trades at ₹823.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas MARICO.NS's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARICO.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to MARICO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check MARICO.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs MARICO.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, MARICO.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while MARICO.BO trades at ₹824.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas MARICO.BO's P/E ratio is 62.47. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARICO.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to MARICO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check MARICO.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs GODREJCP.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, GODREJCP.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while GODREJCP.BO trades at ₹1,022.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas GODREJCP.BO's P/E ratio is 57.74. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GODREJCP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJCP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check GODREJCP.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs GODREJCP.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, GODREJCP.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while GODREJCP.NS trades at ₹1,020.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas GODREJCP.NS's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GODREJCP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJCP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check GODREJCP.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs DABUR.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, DABUR.BO has a market cap of 800.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while DABUR.BO trades at ₹447.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas DABUR.BO's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DABUR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS and DABUR.BO have similar daily volatility (2.11).Check DABUR.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs COLPAL.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, COLPAL.BO has a market cap of 586.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while COLPAL.BO trades at ₹2,095.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas COLPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLPAL.BO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to COLPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check COLPAL.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs COLPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, COLPAL.NS has a market cap of 586.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while COLPAL.NS trades at ₹2,097.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas COLPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLPAL.NS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to COLPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check COLPAL.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs PGHH.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, PGHH.BO has a market cap of 311.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while PGHH.BO trades at ₹9,666.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas PGHH.BO's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGHH.BO's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to PGHH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check PGHH.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs PGHH.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, PGHH.NS has a market cap of 311.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while PGHH.NS trades at ₹9,659.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas PGHH.NS's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGHH.NS's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to PGHH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check PGHH.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs GILLETTE.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, GILLETTE.BO has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while GILLETTE.BO trades at ₹7,804.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas GILLETTE.BO's P/E ratio is 47.44. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GILLETTE.BO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to GILLETTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check GILLETTE.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs GILLETTE.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, GILLETTE.NS has a market cap of 253.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while GILLETTE.NS trades at ₹7,807.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas GILLETTE.NS's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GILLETTE.NS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to GILLETTE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check GILLETTE.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs EMAMILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, EMAMILTD.BO has a market cap of 176B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while EMAMILTD.BO trades at ₹404.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas EMAMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMAMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check EMAMILTD.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs EMAMILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, EMAMILTD.NS has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while EMAMILTD.NS trades at ₹404.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas EMAMILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMAMILTD.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check EMAMILTD.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs CUPID.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, CUPID.BO has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while CUPID.BO trades at ₹124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas CUPID.BO's P/E ratio is 152.34. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUPID.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to CUPID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check CUPID.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs CUPID.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, CUPID.NS has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while CUPID.NS trades at ₹124.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas CUPID.NS's P/E ratio is 152.29. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUPID.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to CUPID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check CUPID.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs HONASA.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, HONASA.BO has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while HONASA.BO trades at ₹391.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas HONASA.BO's P/E ratio is 62.84. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HONASA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to HONASA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check HONASA.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs HONASA.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, HONASA.NS has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while HONASA.NS trades at ₹391.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas HONASA.NS's P/E ratio is 62.70. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HONASA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to HONASA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check HONASA.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs BAJAJCON.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, BAJAJCON.NS has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while BAJAJCON.NS trades at ₹561.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas BAJAJCON.NS's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAJAJCON.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check BAJAJCON.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs JYOTHYLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, JYOTHYLAB.NS has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while JYOTHYLAB.NS trades at ₹203.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas JYOTHYLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JYOTHYLAB.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTHYLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check JYOTHYLAB.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs JYOTHYLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, JYOTHYLAB.BO has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while JYOTHYLAB.BO trades at ₹203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas JYOTHYLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JYOTHYLAB.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTHYLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check JYOTHYLAB.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs BAJAJCON.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, BAJAJCON.BO has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while BAJAJCON.BO trades at ₹562.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas BAJAJCON.BO's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAJAJCON.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check BAJAJCON.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs ALLTIME.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, ALLTIME.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while ALLTIME.NS trades at ₹238.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas ALLTIME.NS's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALLTIME.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to ALLTIME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check ALLTIME.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs BCLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, BCLIND.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while BCLIND.NS trades at ₹35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas BCLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCLIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to BCLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check BCLIND.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs KAYA.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, KAYA.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while KAYA.NS trades at ₹248.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas KAYA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAYA.NS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to KAYA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check KAYA.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs KAYA.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, KAYA.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while KAYA.BO trades at ₹247.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas KAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAYA.BO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to KAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check KAYA.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs ADORMUL.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, ADORMUL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while ADORMUL.BO trades at ₹135.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas ADORMUL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADORMUL.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to ADORMUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check ADORMUL.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs PCCOSMA.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, PCCOSMA.BO has a market cap of 867.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while PCCOSMA.BO trades at ₹333.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas PCCOSMA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCCOSMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to PCCOSMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check PCCOSMA.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs JHS.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, JHS.NS has a market cap of 749.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while JHS.NS trades at ₹8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas JHS.NS's P/E ratio is -13.62. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JHS.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to JHS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check JHS.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs JHS.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, JHS.BO has a market cap of 744.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while JHS.BO trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas JHS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JHS.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to JHS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check JHS.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs STDSFAC.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, STDSFAC.BO has a market cap of 428.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while STDSFAC.BO trades at ₹50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas STDSFAC.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STDSFAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to STDSFAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check STDSFAC.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs AMBICAAGAR.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, AMBICAAGAR.NS has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while AMBICAAGAR.NS trades at ₹23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas AMBICAAGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBICAAGAR.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to AMBICAAGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check AMBICAAGAR.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs AMBICAAGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, AMBICAAGAR.BO has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while AMBICAAGAR.BO trades at ₹23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas AMBICAAGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 81.97. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBICAAGAR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to AMBICAAGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check AMBICAAGAR.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs NKIND.NS Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, NKIND.NS has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while NKIND.NS trades at ₹67.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas NKIND.NS's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NKIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to NKIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check NKIND.NS's competition here
DABUR.NS vs NKIND.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, NKIND.BO has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while NKIND.BO trades at ₹62.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas NKIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NKIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to NKIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check NKIND.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs NUWAY.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, NUWAY.BO has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while NUWAY.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas NUWAY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NUWAY.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to NUWAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check NUWAY.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs PAOS.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, PAOS.BO has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while PAOS.BO trades at ₹50.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas PAOS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAOS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to PAOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check PAOS.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs HIPOLIN.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, HIPOLIN.BO has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while HIPOLIN.BO trades at ₹92.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas HIPOLIN.BO's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HIPOLIN.BO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to HIPOLIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check HIPOLIN.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs SATTVASUKU.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, SATTVASUKU.BO has a market cap of 287.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while SATTVASUKU.BO trades at ₹0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas SATTVASUKU.BO's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SATTVASUKU.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to SATTVASUKU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check SATTVASUKU.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs PARMCOS-B.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, PARMCOS-B.BO has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while PARMCOS-B.BO trades at ₹35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas PARMCOS-B.BO's P/E ratio is 310.09. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PARMCOS-B.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is less volatile compared to PARMCOS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check PARMCOS-B.BO's competition here
DABUR.NS vs CORNE.BO Comparison May 2026
DABUR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DABUR.NS stands at 800B. In comparison, CORNE.BO has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DABUR.NS is priced at ₹447.20, while CORNE.BO trades at ₹9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DABUR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.39, whereas CORNE.BO's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, DABUR.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CORNE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DABUR.NS is more volatile compared to CORNE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DABUR.NS.Check CORNE.BO's competition here