Cupid Limited
Cupid Limited (CUPID.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CUPID.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUPID.NS | ₹124.69 | +3.64% | 167.7B | 157.84 | ₹0.79 | N/A |
| HINDUNILVR.BO | ₹2,197.45 | -0.21% | 5.2T | 47.52 | ₹46.24 | +1.96% |
| HINDUNILVR.NS | ₹2,196.50 | -0.32% | 5.2T | 48.63 | ₹45.17 | +1.96% |
| MARICO.BO | ₹824.40 | -0.02% | 1.1T | 62.45 | ₹13.20 | +0.85% |
| MARICO.NS | ₹823.35 | -0.13% | 1.1T | 60.54 | ₹13.60 | +0.85% |
| GODREJCP.BO | ₹1,022.40 | -0.58% | 1T | 57.41 | ₹17.81 | +1.96% |
| GODREJCP.NS | ₹1,020.40 | -0.69% | 1T | 56.10 | ₹18.19 | +1.96% |
| DABUR.NS | ₹447.20 | -0.85% | 793.2B | 42.03 | ₹10.64 | +1.79% |
| DABUR.BO | ₹447.15 | -0.91% | 793.1B | 43.12 | ₹10.37 | +1.79% |
| COLPAL.NS | ₹2,097.00 | -2.78% | 570.4B | 43.02 | ₹48.75 | +2.43% |
Stock Comparison
CUPID.NS vs HINDUNILVR.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, HINDUNILVR.BO has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while HINDUNILVR.BO trades at ₹2,197.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas HINDUNILVR.BO's P/E ratio is 47.52. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HINDUNILVR.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to HINDUNILVR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check HINDUNILVR.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs HINDUNILVR.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, HINDUNILVR.NS has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while HINDUNILVR.NS trades at ₹2,196.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas HINDUNILVR.NS's P/E ratio is 48.63. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HINDUNILVR.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to HINDUNILVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check HINDUNILVR.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs MARICO.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, MARICO.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while MARICO.BO trades at ₹824.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas MARICO.BO's P/E ratio is 62.45. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MARICO.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to MARICO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check MARICO.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs MARICO.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, MARICO.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while MARICO.NS trades at ₹823.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas MARICO.NS's P/E ratio is 60.54. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MARICO.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to MARICO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check MARICO.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs GODREJCP.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, GODREJCP.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while GODREJCP.BO trades at ₹1,022.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas GODREJCP.BO's P/E ratio is 57.41. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GODREJCP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check GODREJCP.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs GODREJCP.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, GODREJCP.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while GODREJCP.NS trades at ₹1,020.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas GODREJCP.NS's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GODREJCP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJCP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check GODREJCP.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs DABUR.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, DABUR.NS has a market cap of 793.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while DABUR.NS trades at ₹447.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas DABUR.NS's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DABUR.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to DABUR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check DABUR.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs DABUR.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, DABUR.BO has a market cap of 793.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while DABUR.BO trades at ₹447.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas DABUR.BO's P/E ratio is 43.12. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DABUR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to DABUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check DABUR.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs COLPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, COLPAL.NS has a market cap of 570.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while COLPAL.NS trades at ₹2,097.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas COLPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COLPAL.NS's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to COLPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check COLPAL.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs COLPAL.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, COLPAL.BO has a market cap of 570B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while COLPAL.BO trades at ₹2,095.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas COLPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COLPAL.BO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to COLPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check COLPAL.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs PGHH.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, PGHH.BO has a market cap of 313.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while PGHH.BO trades at ₹9,666.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas PGHH.BO's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PGHH.BO's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to PGHH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check PGHH.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs PGHH.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, PGHH.NS has a market cap of 313.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while PGHH.NS trades at ₹9,659.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas PGHH.NS's P/E ratio is 43.81. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PGHH.NS's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to PGHH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check PGHH.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs GILLETTE.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, GILLETTE.NS has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while GILLETTE.NS trades at ₹7,807.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas GILLETTE.NS's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GILLETTE.NS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to GILLETTE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check GILLETTE.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs GILLETTE.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, GILLETTE.BO has a market cap of 254.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while GILLETTE.BO trades at ₹7,804.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas GILLETTE.BO's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GILLETTE.BO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to GILLETTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check GILLETTE.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs EMAMILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, EMAMILTD.BO has a market cap of 176.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while EMAMILTD.BO trades at ₹404.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas EMAMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EMAMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check EMAMILTD.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs EMAMILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, EMAMILTD.NS has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while EMAMILTD.NS trades at ₹404.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas EMAMILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EMAMILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check EMAMILTD.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs CUPID.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, CUPID.BO has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while CUPID.BO trades at ₹124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas CUPID.BO's P/E ratio is 155.81. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CUPID.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to CUPID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check CUPID.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs HONASA.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, HONASA.NS has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while HONASA.NS trades at ₹391.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas HONASA.NS's P/E ratio is 64.03. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HONASA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to HONASA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check HONASA.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs HONASA.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, HONASA.BO has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while HONASA.BO trades at ₹391.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas HONASA.BO's P/E ratio is 64.01. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HONASA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to HONASA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check HONASA.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs JYOTHYLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, JYOTHYLAB.BO has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while JYOTHYLAB.BO trades at ₹203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas JYOTHYLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JYOTHYLAB.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to JYOTHYLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check JYOTHYLAB.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs JYOTHYLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, JYOTHYLAB.NS has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while JYOTHYLAB.NS trades at ₹203.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas JYOTHYLAB.NS's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JYOTHYLAB.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to JYOTHYLAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check JYOTHYLAB.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs BAJAJCON.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, BAJAJCON.NS has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while BAJAJCON.NS trades at ₹561.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas BAJAJCON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAJAJCON.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check BAJAJCON.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs BAJAJCON.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, BAJAJCON.BO has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while BAJAJCON.BO trades at ₹562.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas BAJAJCON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAJAJCON.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check BAJAJCON.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs ALLTIME.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, ALLTIME.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while ALLTIME.NS trades at ₹238.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas ALLTIME.NS's P/E ratio is 43.78. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALLTIME.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to ALLTIME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check ALLTIME.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs BCLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, BCLIND.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while BCLIND.NS trades at ₹35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas BCLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCLIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to BCLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check BCLIND.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs KAYA.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, KAYA.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while KAYA.NS trades at ₹248.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas KAYA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KAYA.NS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to KAYA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check KAYA.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs KAYA.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, KAYA.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while KAYA.BO trades at ₹247.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas KAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KAYA.BO's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to KAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check KAYA.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs ADORMUL.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, ADORMUL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while ADORMUL.BO trades at ₹135.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas ADORMUL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADORMUL.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to ADORMUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check ADORMUL.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs PCCOSMA.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, PCCOSMA.BO has a market cap of 883.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while PCCOSMA.BO trades at ₹333.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas PCCOSMA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCCOSMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to PCCOSMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check PCCOSMA.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs JHS.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, JHS.NS has a market cap of 756.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while JHS.NS trades at ₹8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas JHS.NS's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JHS.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to JHS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check JHS.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs JHS.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, JHS.BO has a market cap of 751.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while JHS.BO trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas JHS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JHS.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to JHS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check JHS.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs STDSFAC.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, STDSFAC.BO has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while STDSFAC.BO trades at ₹50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas STDSFAC.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STDSFAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to STDSFAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check STDSFAC.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs AMBICAAGAR.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, AMBICAAGAR.NS has a market cap of 406.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while AMBICAAGAR.NS trades at ₹23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas AMBICAAGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBICAAGAR.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to AMBICAAGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check AMBICAAGAR.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs NKIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, NKIND.NS has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while NKIND.NS trades at ₹67.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas NKIND.NS's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NKIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to NKIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check NKIND.NS's competition here
CUPID.NS vs AMBICAAGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, AMBICAAGAR.BO has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while AMBICAAGAR.BO trades at ₹23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas AMBICAAGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 80.83. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBICAAGAR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to AMBICAAGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check AMBICAAGAR.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs NKIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, NKIND.BO has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while NKIND.BO trades at ₹62.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas NKIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NKIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to NKIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check NKIND.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs NUWAY.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, NUWAY.BO has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while NUWAY.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas NUWAY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUWAY.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to NUWAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check NUWAY.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs PAOS.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, PAOS.BO has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while PAOS.BO trades at ₹50.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas PAOS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PAOS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to PAOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check PAOS.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs HIPOLIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, HIPOLIN.BO has a market cap of 290.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while HIPOLIN.BO trades at ₹92.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas HIPOLIN.BO's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIPOLIN.BO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to HIPOLIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check HIPOLIN.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs SATTVASUKU.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, SATTVASUKU.BO has a market cap of 287.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while SATTVASUKU.BO trades at ₹0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas SATTVASUKU.BO's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SATTVASUKU.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to SATTVASUKU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check SATTVASUKU.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs PARMCOS-B.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, PARMCOS-B.BO has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while PARMCOS-B.BO trades at ₹35.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas PARMCOS-B.BO's P/E ratio is 318.27. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PARMCOS-B.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is less volatile compared to PARMCOS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check PARMCOS-B.BO's competition here
CUPID.NS vs CORNE.BO Comparison May 2026
CUPID.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUPID.NS stands at 167.7B. In comparison, CORNE.BO has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUPID.NS is priced at ₹124.69, while CORNE.BO trades at ₹9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUPID.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 157.84, whereas CORNE.BO's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, CUPID.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CORNE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUPID.NS is more volatile compared to CORNE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUPID.NS.Check CORNE.BO's competition here