Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CW | $478.91 | -0.42% | 18B | 40.45 | $11.83 | +0.18% |
| GE | $266.61 | +0.03% | 282.7B | 38.04 | $7.01 | +0.48% |
| RTX | $156.27 | +0.02% | 209.1B | 34.34 | $4.55 | +1.67% |
| BA | $226.87 | -1.41% | 171.6B | -13.71 | -$16.55 | N/A |
| LMT | $447.72 | +0.34% | 104.5B | 25.14 | $17.80 | +2.91% |
| GD | $319.89 | +0.09% | 86B | 21.48 | $14.89 | +1.82% |
| NOC | $586.74 | -0.96% | 84B | 21.67 | $27.07 | +1.44% |
| TDG | $1,389.98 | -1.31% | 78.3B | 46.07 | $30.14 | +5.40% |
| AXON | $763.52 | -0.35% | 59.9B | 188.06 | $4.06 | N/A |
| LHX | $276.17 | +0.15% | 51.7B | 30.84 | $8.96 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
CW vs GE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 282.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while GE trades at $266.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check GE's competition here
CW vs RTX Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while RTX trades at $156.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check RTX's competition here
CW vs BA Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 171.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while BA trades at $226.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas BA's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BA's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check BA's competition here
CW vs LMT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LMT has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LMT trades at $447.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LMT's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMT's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to LMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LMT's competition here
CW vs GD Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while GD trades at $319.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check GD's competition here
CW vs NOC Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while NOC trades at $586.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check NOC's competition here
CW vs TDG Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while TDG trades at $1,389.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check TDG's competition here
CW vs AXON Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AXON trades at $763.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 188.06. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AXON's competition here
CW vs LHX Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LHX trades at $276.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LHX's competition here
CW vs HEI-A Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while HEI-A trades at $239.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 56.02. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check HEI-A's competition here
CW vs HEI Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while HEI trades at $305.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check HEI's competition here
CW vs RKLB Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while RKLB trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -102.64. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check RKLB's competition here
CW vs ESLT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ESLT trades at $458.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ESLT's competition here
CW vs BWXT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while BWXT trades at $162.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check BWXT's competition here
CW vs WWD Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while WWD trades at $246.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check WWD's competition here
CW vs TXT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while TXT trades at $80.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check TXT's competition here
CW vs AVAV Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AVAV trades at $241.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 154.58. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AVAV's competition here
CW vs KTOS Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KTOS trades at $66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 669.00. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KTOS's competition here
CW vs DRS Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while DRS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check DRS's competition here
CW vs HII Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while HII trades at $270.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check HII's competition here
CW vs ERJ Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ERJ trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ERJ's competition here
CW vs SARO Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SARO trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 67.27. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SARO's competition here
CW vs CAE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while CAE trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check CAE's competition here
CW vs KRMN Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KRMN trades at $53.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 883.92. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KRMN's competition here
CW vs LOAR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LOAR trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 154.13. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LOAR's competition here
CW vs FLY Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while FLY trades at $44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check FLY's competition here
CW vs MOG-A Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while MOG-A trades at $197.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check MOG-A's competition here
CW vs ACHR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ACHR trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ACHR's competition here
CW vs MOG-B Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while MOG-B trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check MOG-B's competition here
CW vs ACHR-WT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ACHR-WT trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
CW vs HXL Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while HXL trades at $62.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 57.77. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check HXL's competition here
CW vs SPR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SPR trades at $40.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SPR's competition here
CW vs AJRD Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AJRD's competition here
CW vs MRCY Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while MRCY trades at $67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -104.58. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check MRCY's competition here
CW vs VSEC Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while VSEC trades at $165.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 49.16. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check VSEC's competition here
CW vs POWWP Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while POWWP trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 83.44. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check POWWP's competition here
CW vs AIR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AIR trades at $75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 214.37. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AIR's competition here
CW vs PL Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while PL trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -19.61. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check PL's competition here
CW vs TGI Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check TGI's competition here
CW vs PL-WT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while PL-WT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check PL-WT's competition here
CW vs VVX Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while VVX trades at $57.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check VVX's competition here
CW vs LUNR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LUNR trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LUNR's competition here
CW vs DCO Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while DCO trades at $93.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check DCO's competition here
CW vs KAMN Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KAMN's competition here
CW vs ATRO Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ATRO trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -331.18. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ATRO's competition here
CW vs RDW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while RDW trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check RDW's competition here
CW vs EVEX-WT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
CW vs CDRE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while CDRE trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check CDRE's competition here
CW vs EVEX Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while EVEX trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check EVEX's competition here
CW vs VEC Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check VEC's competition here
CW vs SKYH Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 811.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SKYH trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SKYH's competition here
CW vs NPK Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 767.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while NPK trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check NPK's competition here
CW vs EH Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while EH trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -36.31. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check EH's competition here
CW vs RGR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while RGR trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 105.94. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check RGR's competition here
CW vs EVTL Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while EVTL trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check EVTL's competition here
CW vs BYRN Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while BYRN trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check BYRN's competition here
CW vs TATT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 468.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while TATT trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check TATT's competition here
CW vs PKE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while PKE trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check PKE's competition here
CW vs SWBI Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SWBI trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SWBI's competition here
CW vs AZ Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AZ has a market cap of 335.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AZ trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AZ's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to AZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AZ's competition here
CW vs ISSC Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 233.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ISSC trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ISSC's competition here
CW vs SPCE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SPCE trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SPCE's competition here
CW vs POWW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while POWW trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check POWW's competition here
CW vs IVAC Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check IVAC's competition here
CW vs CODA Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while CODA trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check CODA's competition here
CW vs HOVRW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while HOVRW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check HOVRW's competition here
CW vs OPXS Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while OPXS trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check OPXS's competition here
CW vs VTSI Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while VTSI trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 58.80. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check VTSI's competition here
CW vs HOVR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while HOVR trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check HOVR's competition here
CW vs SKYH-WT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SKYH-WT trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SKYH-WT's competition here
CW vs LLAP Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LLAP's competition here
CW vs LLAP-WT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
CW vs SIF Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SIF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is -22.32. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SIF's competition here
CW vs LILM Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILM's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LILM's competition here
CW vs KITT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KITT trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KITT's ROE of +9.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KITT's competition here
CW vs CVU Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while CVU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check CVU's competition here
CW vs KITTW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KITTW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +9.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KITTW's competition here
CW vs SIDU Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while SIDU trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check SIDU's competition here
CW vs XTIA Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while XTIA trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check XTIA's competition here
CW vs PRZO Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while PRZO trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -7.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check PRZO's competition here
CW vs DPRO Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while DPRO trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check DPRO's competition here
CW vs MNTS Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while MNTS trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check MNTS's competition here
CW vs ASTR Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASTR's ROE of -51.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ASTR's competition here
CW vs GPUS Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while GPUS trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check GPUS's competition here
CW vs AIRI Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AIRI trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AIRI's competition here
CW vs AULT Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AULT's ROE of -11.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check AULT's competition here
CW vs ASTC Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while ASTC trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check ASTC's competition here
CW vs KWESW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KWESW's competition here
CW vs KWE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check KWE's competition here
CW vs MNTSW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, MNTSW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while MNTSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas MNTSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNTSW's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to MNTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check MNTSW's competition here
CW vs LILMW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILMW's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check LILMW's competition here
CW vs VORBW Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, VORBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while VORBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas VORBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VORBW's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to VORBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check VORBW's competition here
CW vs NILE Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, NILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while NILE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas NILE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NILE's ROE of +22.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to NILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check NILE's competition here
CW vs VORB Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, VORB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while VORB trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas VORB's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VORB's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to VORB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check VORB's competition here
CW vs RADA Comparison August 2025
CW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CW stands at 18B. In comparison, RADA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CW is priced at $478.91, while RADA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CW currently has a P/E ratio of 40.45, whereas RADA's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, CW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RADA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CW is less volatile compared to RADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CW.Check RADA's competition here