CubeSmart
CubeSmart (CUBE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CUBE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUBE | $40.40 | -1.68% | 9.2B | 24.63 | $1.64 | +5.12% |
| PLD | $111.62 | -0.59% | 103.6B | 30.08 | $3.71 | +3.53% |
| PSA | $289.84 | -1.32% | 50.9B | 31.65 | $9.16 | +4.14% |
| PSA-PK | $19.58 | -0.15% | 49.6B | 1.90 | $10.29 | +4.14% |
| PSA-PH | $23.82 | -0.13% | 49.3B | 2.32 | $10.29 | +4.14% |
| EXR | $140.19 | -1.79% | 29.8B | 30.47 | $4.60 | +4.61% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | N/A |
| LINE | $41.77 | +3.70% | 9.6B | -17.40 | -$2.40 | +4.72% |
| REXR | $40.10 | -0.79% | 9.5B | 29.92 | $1.34 | +4.23% |
| EGP | $168.36 | -0.67% | 9B | 36.27 | $4.64 | +3.33% |
Stock Comparison
CUBE vs PLD Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PLD trades at $111.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLD's competition here
CUBE vs PSA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PK Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PK trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PK's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PH Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PH trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PH's competition here
CUBE vs EXR Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while EXR trades at $140.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check EXR's competition here
CUBE vs LSI Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LSI's competition here
CUBE vs LINE Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LINE trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LINE's competition here
CUBE vs REXR Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while REXR trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR's competition here
CUBE vs EGP Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while EGP trades at $168.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check EGP's competition here
CUBE vs REXR-PB Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while REXR-PB trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR-PB's competition here
CUBE vs STAG Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while STAG trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check STAG's competition here
CUBE vs FR Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while FR trades at $51.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check FR's competition here
CUBE vs TRNO Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while TRNO trades at $57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TRNO's competition here
CUBE vs REXR-PC Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while REXR-PC trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check REXR-PC's competition here
CUBE vs COLD Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while COLD trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -81.47. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check COLD's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PF Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PF trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PF's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PG Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PG trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PG's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PI Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PI trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PI's competition here
CUBE vs GRP-UN Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while GRP-UN trades at $57.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check GRP-UN's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PJ Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PJ trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PL Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PL trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PL's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PM Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PM trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PM's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PS Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PS trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PS's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PP Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PP trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PP's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PR Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PR trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PR's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PQ Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PQ trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PO Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PO trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PO's competition here
CUBE vs PSA-PN Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PSA-PN trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PSA-PN's competition here
CUBE vs LXP Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LXP trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LXP's competition here
CUBE vs LXP-PC Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LXP-PC trades at $47.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LXP-PC's competition here
CUBE vs NSA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while NSA trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 51.15. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NSA's competition here
CUBE vs NSA-PA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while NSA-PA trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NSA-PA's competition here
CUBE vs IIPR Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while IIPR trades at $55.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check IIPR's competition here
CUBE vs IIPR-PA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while IIPR-PA trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
CUBE vs SCCD Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while SCCD trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCD's competition here
CUBE vs PMTU Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PMTU trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PMTU's competition here
CUBE vs SCCE Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while SCCE trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCE's competition here
CUBE vs PLYM Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 940.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PLYM trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLYM's competition here
CUBE vs DHCNI Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while DHCNI trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DHCNI's competition here
CUBE vs LANDO Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 697.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LANDO trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -66.94. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LANDO's competition here
CUBE vs RCC Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 644.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while RCC trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check RCC's competition here
CUBE vs TFSA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 603M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while TFSA trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TFSA's competition here
CUBE vs TPTA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 556.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while TPTA trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check TPTA's competition here
CUBE vs NHPAP Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while NHPAP trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check NHPAP's competition here
CUBE vs ILPT Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 394.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while ILPT trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check ILPT's competition here
CUBE vs LAND Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LAND trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -20.59. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LAND's competition here
CUBE vs LANDM Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LANDM trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -225.91. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LANDM's competition here
CUBE vs LPA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 202.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while LPA trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check LPA's competition here
CUBE vs PLYM-PA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
CUBE vs AJXA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AJXA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check AJXA's competition here
CUBE vs SCCB Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCB's competition here
CUBE vs SACC Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SACC's competition here
CUBE vs SELF Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while SELF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SELF's competition here
CUBE vs SCCF Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while SCCF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check SCCF's competition here
CUBE vs PW-PA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while PW-PA trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check PW-PA's competition here
CUBE vs QTS-PB Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS-PB's competition here
CUBE vs QTS-PA Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS-PA's competition here
CUBE vs MNR-PC Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check MNR-PC's competition here
CUBE vs CONE Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check CONE's competition here
CUBE vs DRE Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check DRE's competition here
CUBE vs QTS Comparison August 2025
CUBE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUBE stands at 9.2B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CUBE is priced at $40.40, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUBE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUBE's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUBE is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUBE.Check QTS's competition here