CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc.
CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc. (CTT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTT | $10.37 | -1.43% | 0 | 9.02 | $1.15 | N/A |
| EQIX | $969.90 | -0.16% | 95.3B | 70.33 | $13.79 | +1.98% |
| AMT | $184.41 | +2.53% | 86.4B | 34.16 | $5.40 | +3.70% |
| CCI | $87.47 | +1.58% | 38.1B | 34.71 | $2.52 | +4.87% |
| IRM | $106.84 | -0.50% | 31.6B | 222.50 | $0.48 | +2.99% |
| SBAC | $188.04 | +1.79% | 19.9B | 19.19 | $9.80 | +2.44% |
| WY | $23.46 | +1.87% | 16.9B | 52.16 | $0.45 | +3.59% |
| LAMR | $134.14 | +0.16% | 13.6B | 23.29 | $5.76 | +4.82% |
| GLPI | $47.58 | -1.61% | 13.5B | 16.13 | $2.95 | +6.56% |
| OUT | $26.71 | -0.78% | 4.7B | 32.56 | $0.82 | +4.46% |
Stock Comparison
CTT vs EQIX Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EQIX trades at $969.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 70.33. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check EQIX's competition here
CTT vs AMT Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while AMT trades at $184.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check AMT's competition here
CTT vs CCI Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while CCI trades at $87.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check CCI's competition here
CTT vs IRM Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while IRM trades at $106.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 222.50. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check IRM's competition here
CTT vs SBAC Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while SBAC trades at $188.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check SBAC's competition here
CTT vs WY Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while WY trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to WY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check WY's competition here
CTT vs LAMR Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while LAMR trades at $134.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check LAMR's competition here
CTT vs GLPI Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while GLPI trades at $47.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check GLPI's competition here
CTT vs OUT Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while OUT trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check OUT's competition here
CTT vs EPR Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR trades at $56.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check EPR's competition here
CTT vs TIPRX Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check TIPRX's competition here
CTT vs RYN Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while RYN trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check RYN's competition here
CTT vs PCH Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check PCH's competition here
CTT vs EPR-PE Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR-PE trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check EPR-PE's competition here
CTT vs EPR-PC Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR-PC trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check EPR-PC's competition here
CTT vs CXW Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while CXW trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check CXW's competition here
CTT vs UNIT Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while UNIT trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIT's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check UNIT's competition here
CTT vs EPR-PG Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR-PG trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check EPR-PG's competition here
CTT vs SMA Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while SMA trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -158.65. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check SMA's competition here
CTT vs LANDP Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 718.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while LANDP trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check LANDP's competition here
CTT vs FPI Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while FPI trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check FPI's competition here
CTT vs KRSOX Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 300.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while KRSOX trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check KRSOX's competition here
CTT vs AFCG Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while AFCG trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check AFCG's competition here
CTT vs PW Comparison March 2026
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while PW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to PW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.Check PW's competition here