CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc.
CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc. CTT Peers
See (CTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTT | $10.37 | -1.43% | 0 | 9.02 | $1.15 | N/A |
| AMT | $221.79 | +0.00% | 102.5B | 35.36 | $6.19 | +3.77% |
| EQIX | $760.93 | +0.10% | 74.3B | 79.16 | $9.60 | +2.91% |
| CCI | $103.01 | -0.23% | 44.4B | -11.31 | -$9.01 | +7.19% |
| IRM | $96.95 | -1.07% | 28.7B | 237.20 | $0.41 | +3.74% |
| SBAC | $232.14 | -0.09% | 24.7B | 30.43 | $7.56 | +2.24% |
| WY | $25.57 | -1.26% | 18.4B | 51.70 | $0.49 | +4.01% |
| GLPI | $47.45 | -1.30% | 13B | 16.72 | $2.83 | +6.44% |
| LAMR | $124.03 | -1.57% | 12.9B | 30.58 | $4.04 | +6.00% |
| EPR | $59.87 | -2.19% | 4.5B | 36.61 | $1.63 | +5.77% |
Stock Comparison
CTT vs AMT Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while AMT trades at $221.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs EQIX Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EQIX trades at $760.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 79.16. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs CCI Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while CCI trades at $103.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to CCI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs IRM Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while IRM trades at $96.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 237.20. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs SBAC Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while SBAC trades at $232.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs WY Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while WY trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 51.70. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs GLPI Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while GLPI trades at $47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs LAMR Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while LAMR trades at $124.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs EPR Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR trades at $59.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs RYN Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while RYN trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs PCH Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while PCH trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs OUT Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while OUT trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs EPR-PE Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR-PE trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs CXW Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while CXW trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs EPR-PC Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR-PC trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs EPR-PG Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while EPR-PG trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs SMA Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while SMA trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -102.47. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs UNIT Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while UNIT trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs LANDP Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 720M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while LANDP trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs FPI Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while FPI trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs AFCG Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while AFCG trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to AFCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.
CTT vs PW Comparison
CTT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTT stands at 0. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTT is priced at $10.37, while PW trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTT currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CTT's ROE is N/A, compared to PW's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTT is more volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTT.