Cascada Silver Corp.
Cascada Silver Corp. (CSS.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSS.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSS.CN | CA$0.01 | +100.00% | 2.1M | -1.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| PAAS.TO | CA$37.28 | -0.40% | 13.5B | 31.59 | CA$1.18 | +1.51% |
| AG.TO | CA$10.82 | -1.81% | 5.2B | -28.47 | -CA$0.38 | +0.25% |
| MAG.TO | CA$28.07 | -0.67% | 2.9B | 23.20 | CA$1.21 | +2.89% |
| FVI.TO | CA$8.82 | -1.34% | 2.7B | 12.42 | CA$0.71 | N/A |
| DSV.TO | CA$3.29 | +1.86% | 2.6B | -47.00 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
| FR.TO | CA$8.27 | +3.25% | 2.4B | -37.59 | -CA$0.22 | +0.25% |
| AYA.TO | CA$12.05 | +2.03% | 1.7B | -67.06 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| SVM.TO | CA$5.96 | -1.16% | 1.3B | 15.28 | CA$0.39 | +0.58% |
| BIG.V | CA$0.71 | +0.00% | 185.9M | -10.14 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSS.CN vs PAAS.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, PAAS.TO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PAAS.TO trades at CA$37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PAAS.TO's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to PAAS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to PAAS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check PAAS.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs AG.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, AG.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while AG.TO trades at CA$10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AG.TO's P/E ratio is -28.47. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to AG.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to AG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check AG.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs MAG.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MAG.TO trades at CA$28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check MAG.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs FVI.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, FVI.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FVI.TO trades at CA$8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FVI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to FVI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to FVI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check FVI.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs DSV.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DSV.TO trades at CA$3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check DSV.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs FR.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FR.TO trades at CA$8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check FR.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs AYA.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while AYA.TO trades at CA$12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is -67.06. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check AYA.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs SVM.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SVM.TO trades at CA$5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check SVM.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs BIG.V Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, BIG.V has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BIG.V trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BIG.V's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to BIG.V's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to BIG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check BIG.V's competition here
CSS.CN vs SVRS.V Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SVRS.V has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SVRS.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SVRS.V's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to SVRS.V's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to SVRS.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check SVRS.V's competition here
CSS.CN vs BNKR.V Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, BNKR.V has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BNKR.V trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BNKR.V's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to BNKR.V's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to BNKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check BNKR.V's competition here
CSS.CN vs KUYA.CN Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while KUYA.CN trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check KUYA.CN's competition here
CSS.CN vs BNKR.CN Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, BNKR.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BNKR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BNKR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to BNKR.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to BNKR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check BNKR.CN's competition here
CSS.CN vs SBR.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SBR.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SBR.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SBR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to SBR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN and SBR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBR.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs MSV.TO Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MSV.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to MSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check MSV.TO's competition here
CSS.CN vs HAMR.CN Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, HAMR.CN has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HAMR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HAMR.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to HAMR.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN is less volatile compared to HAMR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSS.CN.Check HAMR.CN's competition here
CSS.CN vs KTRI.V Comparison August 2025
CSS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSS.CN stands at 2.1M. In comparison, KTRI.V has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSS.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while KTRI.V trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KTRI.V's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CSS.CN's ROE is -1.41%, compared to KTRI.V's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSS.CN and KTRI.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KTRI.V's competition here