Credit Suisse Group AG
Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGKF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSGKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGKF | $0.89 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -0.31 | -$2.83 | N/A |
| BACRP | $201.00 | -11.06% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +2.04% |
| CICHY | $20.43 | +0.00% | 361.5B | 5.50 | $3.77 | +4.06% |
| IDCBF | $0.84 | +0.00% | 299.4B | 6.00 | $0.14 | +5.12% |
| IDCBY | $16.34 | +0.00% | 294B | 5.75 | $2.87 | +3.93% |
| HBCYF | $16.99 | -2.91% | 291.7B | 17.88 | $0.95 | +3.87% |
| ACGBY | $17.19 | -0.06% | 278.1B | 6.15 | $2.83 | +3.63% |
| ACGBF | $0.71 | +0.00% | 248.5B | 6.45 | $0.11 | +4.85% |
| CICHF | $1.03 | +0.36% | 241.6B | 5.29 | $0.19 | +5.46% |
| MBFJF | $19.27 | +3.94% | 218.4B | 17.52 | $1.10 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
CSGKF vs BACRP Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BACRP trades at $201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
CSGKF vs CICHY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 361.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CICHY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check CICHY's competition here
CSGKF vs IDCBF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 299.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while IDCBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDCBF's competition here
CSGKF vs IDCBY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 294B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while IDCBY trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check IDCBY's competition here
CSGKF vs HBCYF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 291.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while HBCYF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check HBCYF's competition here
CSGKF vs ACGBY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 278.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ACGBY trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check ACGBY's competition here
CSGKF vs ACGBF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 248.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ACGBF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGBF's competition here
CSGKF vs CICHF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 241.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CICHF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check CICHF's competition here
CSGKF vs MBFJF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 218.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while MBFJF trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check MBFJF's competition here
CSGKF vs CMWAY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 216B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CMWAY trades at $127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check CMWAY's competition here
CSGKF vs BCDRF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCDRF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check BCDRF's competition here
CSGKF vs BACHY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BACHY trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check BACHY's competition here
CSGKF vs BACHF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 175.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BACHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACHF's competition here
CSGKF vs CBAUF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CBAUF trades at $100.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
CSGKF vs SMFNF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SMFNF trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check SMFNF's competition here
CSGKF vs BBVXF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BBVXF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check BBVXF's competition here
CSGKF vs NABZY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NABZY trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check NABZY's competition here
CSGKF vs WEBNF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while WEBNF trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check WEBNF's competition here
CSGKF vs NAUBF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NAUBF trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and NAUBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAUBF's competition here
CSGKF vs BCLYF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCLYF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check BCLYF's competition here
CSGKF vs ANZGY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ANZGY trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check ANZGY's competition here
CSGKF vs INGVF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while INGVF trades at $29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGVF's competition here
CSGKF vs BKFCF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
CSGKF vs BCMXY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCMXY trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BCMXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCMXY's competition here
CSGKF vs RBSPF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while RBSPF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check RBSPF's competition here
CSGKF vs SCBFY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SCBFY trades at $48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check SCBFY's competition here
CSGKF vs SCBFF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SCBFF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check SCBFF's competition here
CSGKF vs ANEWF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
CSGKF vs NTIOF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NTIOF trades at $128.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check NTIOF's competition here
CSGKF vs FANDY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while FANDY trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and FANDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDY's competition here
CSGKF vs FANDF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while FANDF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
CSGKF vs TDBKF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check TDBKF's competition here
CSGKF vs SVNLY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SVNLY trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check SVNLY's competition here
CSGKF vs SVNLF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SVNLF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check SVNLF's competition here
CSGKF vs ABMRF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ABMRF trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
CSGKF vs AAVMY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while AAVMY trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check AAVMY's competition here
CSGKF vs RBCPF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check RBCPF's competition here
CSGKF vs BNSPF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
CSGKF vs BNDSY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BNDSY trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check BNDSY's competition here
CSGKF vs BNDSF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BNDSF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BNDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSF's competition here
CSGKF vs EFGXY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while EFGXY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and EFGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EFGXY's competition here
CSGKF vs ALORY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
CSGKF vs EFGIF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while EFGIF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check EFGIF's competition here
CSGKF vs NBKCF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NBKCF trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and NBKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBKCF's competition here
CSGKF vs WFCNP Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while WFCNP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and WFCNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFCNP's competition here
CSGKF vs PRRCF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 710.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while PRRCF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
CSGKF vs VUPPF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
CSGKF vs BCSO Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCSO trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BCSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCSO's competition here
CSGKF vs TNTTF Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.Check TNTTF's competition here
CSGKF vs ANZBY Comparison February 2026
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here