Credit Suisse Group AG
Credit Suisse Group AG CSGKF Peers
See (CSGKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGKF | $0.89 | N/A | 3.5B | -0.31 | -$2.83 | N/A |
| IDCBY | $14.47 | +1.12% | 328B | 5.38 | $2.69 | +7.94% |
| BACRP | $193.00 | N/A | 322B | N/A | N/A | +3.63% |
| IDCBF | $0.68 | N/A | 307.5B | 5.23 | $0.13 | +9.26% |
| ACGBY | $16.09 | +0.44% | 265.4B | 6.19 | $2.60 | +6.90% |
| ACGBF | $0.60 | N/A | 246.4B | 6.00 | $0.10 | +8.10% |
| WFCNP | $1.25 | +2400.00% | 237B | 0.31 | $4.03 | +2.20% |
| CICHY | $17.83 | +0.39% | 228B | 4.98 | $3.58 | +11.01% |
| BACHY | $14.77 | -0.74% | 212.9B | 5.68 | $2.60 | +9.82% |
| CICHF | $0.88 | -0.23% | 211.6B | 4.89 | $0.18 | +12.74% |
Stock Comparison
CSGKF vs IDCBY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 328B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while IDCBY trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BACRP Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 322B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BACRP trades at $193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs IDCBF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 307.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while IDCBF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs ACGBY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 265.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ACGBY trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs ACGBF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 246.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ACGBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs WFCNP Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 237B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while WFCNP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and WFCNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs CICHY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 228B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CICHY trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BACHY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 212.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BACHY trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs CICHF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CICHF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BACHF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BACHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs HBCYF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while HBCYF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs CMWAY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 188.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CMWAY trades at $112.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs CBAUF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 184.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while CBAUF trades at $110.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs MBFJF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while MBFJF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BCDRF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCDRF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs SMFNF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SMFNF trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BBVXF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BBVXF trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs NAUBF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NAUBF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs NABZY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NABZY trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BKFCF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BKFCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BCMXY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCMXY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs WEBNF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while WEBNF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs INGVF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while INGVF trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BCLYF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCLYF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs RBSPF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while RBSPF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs ANZGY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ANZGY trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs ANEWF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs NTIOF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NTIOF trades at $94.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs SCBFY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SCBFY trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs NBKCF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs SCBFF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SCBFF trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs TDBKF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs SVNLY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SVNLY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs SVNLF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while SVNLF trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs RBCPF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs FANDF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while FANDF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BNSPF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs ABMRF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ABMRF trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs AAVMY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while AAVMY trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BNDSF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BNDSF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs BNDSY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BNDSY trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs EFGXY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs EFGIF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs ALORY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ALORY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs FANDY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while FANDY trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs VUPPF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs PRRCF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while PRRCF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSGKF vs BCSO Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while BCSO trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs TNTTF Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGKF.
CSGKF vs ANZBY Comparison
CSGKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGKF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSGKF is priced at $0.89, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGKF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGKF's ROE is N/A, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGKF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).