Carpenter Technology Corporation
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS Peers
See (CRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRS | $276.38 | +0.20% | 13.8B | 39.22 | $7.05 | +0.29% |
| ATI | $86.34 | -0.53% | 12.2B | 31.28 | $2.76 | N/A |
| MLI | $79.47 | -0.16% | 8.8B | 14.47 | $5.49 | +1.13% |
| ESAB | $120.55 | -0.12% | 7.3B | 25.01 | $4.82 | +0.27% |
| WOR | $63.64 | -0.27% | 3.2B | 33.13 | $1.92 | +1.07% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| AZZ | $94.48 | -0.62% | 2.8B | 52.78 | $1.79 | +0.71% |
| CMPO | $14.09 | -0.56% | 1.4B | -10.67 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| CMPOW | $6.25 | -1.57% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PRLB | $40.04 | -1.09% | 951.3M | 66.70 | $0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRS vs ATI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while ATI trades at $86.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs MLI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while MLI trades at $79.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs ESAB Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while ESAB trades at $120.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs WOR Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while WOR trades at $63.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs ARNC Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs AZZ Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while AZZ trades at $94.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 52.78. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs CMPO Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while CMPO trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs CMPOW Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while CMPOW trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs PRLB Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 951.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while PRLB trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 66.70. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs HAYN Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs IIIN Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 721.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while IIIN trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs RYI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while RYI trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -98.14. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs NWPX Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while NWPX trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs MEC Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while MEC trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs TG Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while TG trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -293.33. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs GIFI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while GIFI trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs MTEN Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while MTEN trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs AP Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while AP trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs TPCS Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while TPCS trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs TRSG Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while TRSG trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs HIHO Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while HIHO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs LNKS Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while LNKS trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs SGBX Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while SGBX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs AP-WT Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 381.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while AP-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs ALPP Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs CDSI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $276.38, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.22, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRS has daily volatility of 1.98 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.