Carpenter Technology Corporation
Carpenter Technology Corporation CRS Peers
See (CRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRS | $248.58 | +0.62% | 12.4B | 35.11 | $7.08 | +0.32% |
| ATI | $83.97 | +1.46% | 11.8B | 30.42 | $2.76 | N/A |
| MLI | $77.42 | +0.27% | 8.6B | 14.10 | $5.49 | +1.10% |
| ESAB | $126.95 | +1.02% | 7.7B | 26.28 | $4.83 | +0.25% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| WOR | $60.19 | +1.48% | 3B | 49.74 | $1.21 | +1.13% |
| AZZ | $94.41 | +0.83% | 2.8B | 52.74 | $1.79 | +0.72% |
| CMPO | $13.92 | +1.68% | 1.4B | -10.55 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| CMPOW | $6.11 | +3.38% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PRLB | $38.35 | +2.79% | 911.6M | 63.92 | $0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRS vs ATI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while ATI trades at $83.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs MLI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while MLI trades at $77.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs ESAB Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while ESAB trades at $126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs ARNC Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs WOR Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while WOR trades at $60.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 49.74. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs AZZ Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while AZZ trades at $94.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs CMPO Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while CMPO trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs CMPOW Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while CMPOW trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs PRLB Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 911.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while PRLB trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 63.92. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs HAYN Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs RYI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 704.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while RYI trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -99.45. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs IIIN Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 696.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while IIIN trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs NWPX Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while NWPX trades at $39.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs MEC Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while MEC trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs TG Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 300.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while TG trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -287.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS and TG have similar daily volatility (1.04).
CRS vs GIFI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while GIFI trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs MTEN Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while MTEN trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs AP Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while AP trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs TPCS Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while TPCS trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs TRSG Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while TRSG trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -59.33. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs SGBX Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while SGBX trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs LNKS Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while LNKS trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -14.91. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs HIHO Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while HIHO trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs AP-WT Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 643K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while AP-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs ALPP Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 13.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.
CRS vs CDSI Comparison
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $248.58, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.11, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRS has daily volatility of 1.04 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.