Carpenter Technology Corporation

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while ATI trades at $95.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ATI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while MLI trades at $88.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MLI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while ESAB trades at $133.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ESAB's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while AZZ trades at $111.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AZZ's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while WOR trades at $62.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check WOR's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while ARNC trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ARNC's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while CMPO trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPO's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while CMPOW trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPOW's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 942M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while PRLB trades at $39.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 66.05. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check PRLB's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while HAYN trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HAYN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 727.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while RYI trades at $22.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -102.73. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check RYI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 704.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while IIIN trades at $36.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check IIIN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while NWPX trades at $43.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check NWPX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while MEC trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MEC's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while TG trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -301.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TG's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while GIFI trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check GIFI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while MTEN trades at $14.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MTEN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while AP trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while TPCS trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TPCS's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while TRSG trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -57.17. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TRSG's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while LNKS trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check LNKS's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while HIHO trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is 81.50. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HIHO's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while SGBX trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check SGBX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP-WT's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while ALPP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ALPP's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $277.42, while CDSI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.19, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRS has daily volatility of 1.20 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here