CompoSecure, Inc.
CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPOW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CMPOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMPOW | $6.50 | +0.00% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CRS | $277.42 | +0.35% | 13.8B | 39.19 | $7.05 | +0.29% |
| ATI | $95.51 | +0.55% | 13.5B | 34.61 | $2.76 | N/A |
| MLI | $88.54 | -0.20% | 9.7B | 13.98 | $6.29 | +1.03% |
| ESAB | $133.28 | +0.00% | 8B | 27.30 | $4.82 | +0.26% |
| AZZ | $111.57 | +1.71% | 3.3B | 12.64 | $8.83 | +0.64% |
| WOR | $62.09 | +0.70% | 3.1B | 32.01 | $1.92 | +1.11% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| CMPO | $14.15 | -0.91% | 1.5B | -10.83 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| PRLB | $39.74 | +1.61% | 942M | 66.05 | $0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CMPOW vs CRS Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while CRS trades at $277.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check CRS's competition here
CMPOW vs ATI Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while ATI trades at $95.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check ATI's competition here
CMPOW vs MLI Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while MLI trades at $88.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check MLI's competition here
CMPOW vs ESAB Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while ESAB trades at $133.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check ESAB's competition here
CMPOW vs AZZ Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while AZZ trades at $111.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check AZZ's competition here
CMPOW vs WOR Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while WOR trades at $62.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check WOR's competition here
CMPOW vs ARNC Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check ARNC's competition here
CMPOW vs CMPO Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while CMPO trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check CMPO's competition here
CMPOW vs PRLB Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 942M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while PRLB trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 66.05. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check PRLB's competition here
CMPOW vs HAYN Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check HAYN's competition here
CMPOW vs RYI Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 727.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while RYI trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -102.73. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check RYI's competition here
CMPOW vs IIIN Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 704.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while IIIN trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check IIIN's competition here
CMPOW vs NWPX Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while NWPX trades at $43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check NWPX's competition here
CMPOW vs MEC Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while MEC trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check MEC's competition here
CMPOW vs TG Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while TG trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -301.00. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check TG's competition here
CMPOW vs GIFI Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while GIFI trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check GIFI's competition here
CMPOW vs MTEN Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while MTEN trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check MTEN's competition here
CMPOW vs AP Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while AP trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check AP's competition here
CMPOW vs TPCS Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while TPCS trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check TPCS's competition here
CMPOW vs TRSG Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while TRSG trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -57.17. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check TRSG's competition here
CMPOW vs LNKS Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while LNKS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check LNKS's competition here
CMPOW vs HIHO Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while HIHO trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is 81.50. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check HIHO's competition here
CMPOW vs SGBX Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while SGBX trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check SGBX's competition here
CMPOW vs AP-WT Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check AP-WT's competition here
CMPOW vs ALPP Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMPOW is more volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMPOW.Check ALPP's competition here
CMPOW vs CDSI Comparison July 2025
CMPOW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMPOW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMPOW is priced at $6.50, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMPOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMPOW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMPOW has daily volatility of 0.46 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here