Cingulate Inc.
Cingulate Inc. (CING) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CING) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CING | $5.27 | +1.74% | 26.2M | -1.27 | -$4.03 | N/A |
| VRTX | $470.08 | +2.89% | 118.7B | -121.61 | -$3.80 | N/A |
| REGN | $567.07 | +3.96% | 59.3B | 14.21 | $39.33 | +0.32% |
| ALNY | $419.66 | +6.99% | 52.4B | -162.67 | -$2.47 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ARGX | $685.35 | +2.24% | 41.2B | 41.06 | $16.41 | N/A |
| BNTX | $110.19 | +2.50% | 25.8B | -29.01 | -$3.70 | N/A |
| RPRX | $37.69 | +2.40% | 20.9B | 15.15 | $2.45 | +2.31% |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.2B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
| SMMT | $28.91 | +9.65% | 20.1B | -79.62 | -$0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CING vs VRTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while VRTX trades at $470.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -121.61. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check VRTX's competition here
CING vs REGN Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while REGN trades at $567.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check REGN's competition here
CING vs ALNY Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ALNY trades at $419.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -162.67. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ALNY's competition here
CING vs SGEN Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check SGEN's competition here
CING vs ARGX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ARGX trades at $685.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 41.06. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ARGX's competition here
CING vs BNTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while BNTX trades at $110.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -29.01. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check BNTX's competition here
CING vs RPRX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RPRX trades at $37.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RPRX's competition here
CING vs BGNE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check BGNE's competition here
CING vs SMMT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while SMMT trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -79.62. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check SMMT's competition here
CING vs DNA-WT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check DNA-WT's competition here
CING vs INCY Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while INCY trades at $77.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check INCY's competition here
CING vs GMAB Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while GMAB trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check GMAB's competition here
CING vs UTHR Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while UTHR trades at $293.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check UTHR's competition here
CING vs KRTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check KRTX's competition here
CING vs BMRN Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while BMRN trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check BMRN's competition here
CING vs MRNA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MRNA trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MRNA's competition here
CING vs ASND Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ASND trades at $180.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -25.89. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ASND's competition here
CING vs EXEL Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while EXEL trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check EXEL's competition here
CING vs RXDX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RXDX's competition here
CING vs BBIO Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while BBIO trades at $47.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check BBIO's competition here
CING vs VRNA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while VRNA trades at $105.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -52.59. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check VRNA's competition here
CING vs IMGN Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check IMGN's competition here
CING vs TECH Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while TECH trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 66.13. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check TECH's competition here
CING vs BPMC Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check BPMC's competition here
CING vs CERE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CERE's competition here
CING vs ROIVW Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ROIVW's competition here
CING vs ROIV Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ROIV trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ROIV's competition here
CING vs CORT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CORT trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CORT's competition here
CING vs HALO Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while HALO trades at $59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check HALO's competition here
CING vs JAZZ Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while JAZZ trades at $117.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check JAZZ's competition here
CING vs IONS Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while IONS trades at $43.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -24.45. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check IONS's competition here
CING vs RVMD Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RVMD trades at $36.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RVMD's competition here
CING vs MDGL Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MDGL trades at $316.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MDGL's competition here
CING vs RETA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RETA's competition here
CING vs RYTM Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RYTM trades at $89.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -31.54. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RYTM's competition here
CING vs NUVL Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while NUVL trades at $77.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check NUVL's competition here
CING vs TGTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while TGTX trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 140.08. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check TGTX's competition here
CING vs ABCM Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ABCM's competition here
CING vs ISEE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ISEE's competition here
CING vs ABVX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ABVX trades at $71.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -21.10. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ABVX's competition here
CING vs AXSM Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while AXSM trades at $104.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -17.85. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check AXSM's competition here
CING vs MRUS Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MRUS trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MRUS's competition here
CING vs CRSP Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CRSP trades at $59.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CRSP's competition here
CING vs ADMA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ADMA trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ADMA's competition here
CING vs KRYS Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while KRYS trades at $136.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check KRYS's competition here
CING vs SLNO Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while SLNO trades at $84.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check SLNO's competition here
CING vs ALPN Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ALPN's competition here
CING vs TLX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while TLX trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 145.00. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check TLX's competition here
CING vs ALKS Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ALKS trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ALKS's competition here
CING vs CYTK Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CYTK trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CYTK's competition here
CING vs RNA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RNA trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RNA's competition here
CING vs PCVX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while PCVX trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check PCVX's competition here
CING vs OPT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check OPT's competition here
CING vs PTCT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while PTCT trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check PTCT's competition here
CING vs MRTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MRTX's competition here
CING vs ZLAB Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ZLAB trades at $37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -14.73. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ZLAB's competition here
CING vs ACAD Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ACAD trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ACAD's competition here
CING vs ACLX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ACLX trades at $71.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -23.79. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ACLX's competition here
CING vs AKRO Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while AKRO trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check AKRO's competition here
CING vs RYZB Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RYZB's competition here
CING vs CBAY Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CBAY's competition here
CING vs VKTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while VKTX trades at $33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -21.22. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check VKTX's competition here
CING vs MTSR Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MTSR trades at $34.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MTSR's competition here
CING vs LEGN Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while LEGN trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -32.88. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check LEGN's competition here
CING vs SWTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check SWTX's competition here
CING vs SRRK Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while SRRK trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check SRRK's competition here
CING vs AAPG Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while AAPG trades at $37.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -49.07. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check AAPG's competition here
CING vs MLTX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MLTX trades at $53.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MLTX's competition here
CING vs PTGX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while PTGX trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 69.01. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check PTGX's competition here
CING vs KYMR Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while KYMR trades at $43.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -13.81. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check KYMR's competition here
CING vs APLS Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while APLS trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check APLS's competition here
CING vs MORF Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MORF's competition here
CING vs MOR Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MOR's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MOR's competition here
CING vs KDNY Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check KDNY's competition here
CING vs RARE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RARE trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RARE's competition here
CING vs IMVT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while IMVT trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check IMVT's competition here
CING vs MYOV Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MYOV's competition here
CING vs CRNX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CRNX trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CRNX's competition here
CING vs MIRM Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while MIRM trades at $51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -32.31. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check MIRM's competition here
CING vs CPRX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CPRX trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CPRX's competition here
CING vs LGND Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while LGND trades at $134.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check LGND's competition here
CING vs RXRX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while RXRX trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check RXRX's competition here
CING vs NAMS Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while NAMS trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check NAMS's competition here
CING vs PRVB Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check PRVB's competition here
CING vs KNSA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while KNSA trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 639.60. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check KNSA's competition here
CING vs LBPH Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check LBPH's competition here
CING vs XENE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while XENE trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check XENE's competition here
CING vs NAMSW Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while NAMSW trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check NAMSW's competition here
CING vs DICE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check DICE's competition here
CING vs APGE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while APGE trades at $37.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check APGE's competition here
CING vs CNTA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CNTA trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CNTA's competition here
CING vs ARWR Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while ARWR trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check ARWR's competition here
CING vs IBRX Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while IBRX trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check IBRX's competition here
CING vs GLPG Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, GLPG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while GLPG trades at $33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas GLPG's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to GLPG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to GLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check GLPG's competition here
CING vs CALT Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check CALT's competition here
CING vs BLTE Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while BLTE trades at $67.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -48.32. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check BLTE's competition here
CING vs IDYA Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IDYA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while IDYA trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas IDYA's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to IDYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to IDYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check IDYA's competition here
CING vs IRON Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IRON has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while IRON trades at $59.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas IRON's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to IRON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is more volatile compared to IRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check IRON's competition here
CING vs AGIO Comparison August 2025
CING plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CING stands at 26.2M. In comparison, AGIO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CING is priced at $5.27, while AGIO trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CING currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AGIO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, CING's ROE is -4.73%, compared to AGIO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CING is less volatile compared to AGIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CING.Check AGIO's competition here