Champion Iron Limited
Champion Iron Limited (CIAFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIAFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIAFF | $2.76 | -8.00% | 1.5B | 13.80 | $0.20 | +4.72% |
| AMSYF | $31.63 | -6.70% | 24.3B | 20.15 | $1.57 | +1.66% |
| VLOWY | $3.75 | -3.60% | 22B | 10.42 | $0.36 | +8.62% |
| NPSCY | $6.49 | -0.92% | 20.4B | 8.65 | $0.75 | +3.67% |
| NISTF | $18.80 | -8.29% | 19.6B | 8.28 | $2.27 | +5.57% |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | +632.31% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +4.54% |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| CISXF | $14.90 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 106.43 | $0.14 | +1.54% |
| JFEEF | $11.40 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 12.26 | $0.93 | +5.95% |
Stock Comparison
CIAFF vs AMSYF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while AMSYF trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and AMSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMSYF's competition here
CIAFF vs VLOWY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while VLOWY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check VLOWY's competition here
CIAFF vs NPSCY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while NPSCY trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check NPSCY's competition here
CIAFF vs NISTF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while NISTF trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check NISTF's competition here
CIAFF vs SVJTY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and SVJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVJTY's competition here
CIAFF vs TATLY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and TATLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TATLY's competition here
CIAFF vs HMTLY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and HMTLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTLY's competition here
CIAFF vs CISXF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while CISXF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 106.43. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check CISXF's competition here
CIAFF vs JFEEF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while JFEEF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check JFEEF's competition here
CIAFF vs BLSFF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while BLSFF trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check BLSFF's competition here
CIAFF vs BLSFY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while BLSFY trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and BLSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLSFY's competition here
CIAFF vs KUMBF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and KUMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUMBF's competition here
CIAFF vs SSAAF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SSAAF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check SSAAF's competition here
CIAFF vs KIROY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while KIROY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and KIROY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIROY's competition here
CIAFF vs SSAAY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SSAAY trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check SSAAY's competition here
CIAFF vs VLOUF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while VLOUF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and VLOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLOUF's competition here
CIAFF vs KBSTF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while KBSTF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and KBSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBSTF's competition here
CIAFF vs ICHBF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and ICHBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHBF's competition here
CIAFF vs VLPNF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check VLPNF's competition here
CIAFF vs OUTKY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while OUTKY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check OUTKY's competition here
CIAFF vs YMTKF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and YMTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMTKF's competition here
CIAFF vs ANIOY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while ANIOY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and ANIOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANIOY's competition here
CIAFF vs STZHF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and STZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STZHF's competition here
CIAFF vs MAANF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while MAANF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check MAANF's competition here
CIAFF vs APMSF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while APMSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and APMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMSF's competition here
CIAFF vs SMSMY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SMSMY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check SMSMY's competition here
CIAFF vs APEMY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while APEMY trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and APEMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APEMY's competition here
CIAFF vs ANGGF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while ANGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check ANGGF's competition here
CIAFF vs SMUPF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SMUPF trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -85.27. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check SMUPF's competition here
CIAFF vs EVRZF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and EVRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRZF's competition here
CIAFF vs MCHIF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and MCHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHIF's competition here
CIAFF vs SZGPF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SZGPF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to SZGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check SZGPF's competition here
CIAFF vs OUTFF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check OUTFF's competition here
CIAFF vs SZGPY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SZGPY trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and SZGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZGPY's competition here
CIAFF vs CKSNF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while CKSNF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check CKSNF's competition here
CIAFF vs CKSNY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while CKSNY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and CKSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKSNY's competition here
CIAFF vs CUGCY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while CUGCY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and CUGCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUGCY's competition here
CIAFF vs LIFZF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while LIFZF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check LIFZF's competition here
CIAFF vs SYPLF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check SYPLF's competition here
CIAFF vs ERELY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while ERELY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and ERELY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERELY's competition here
CIAFF vs USNZY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while USNZY trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check USNZY's competition here
CIAFF vs KLKNF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and KLKNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLKNF's competition here
CIAFF vs CUGCF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while CUGCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check CUGCF's competition here
CIAFF vs YDWAF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while YDWAF trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check YDWAF's competition here
CIAFF vs FEEXY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while FEEXY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check FEEXY's competition here
CIAFF vs FEEXF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while FEEXF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check FEEXF's competition here
CIAFF vs OSKXF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check OSKXF's competition here
CIAFF vs MTGRY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while MTGRY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check MTGRY's competition here
CIAFF vs MTGRF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while MTGRF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check MTGRF's competition here
CIAFF vs AMSIY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check AMSIY's competition here
CIAFF vs VLPNY Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 182.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while VLPNY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and VLPNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLPNY's competition here
CIAFF vs WEBC Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while WEBC trades at $187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and WEBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEBC's competition here
CIAFF vs GRRLF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check GRRLF's competition here
CIAFF vs ARCXF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check ARCXF's competition here
CIAFF vs TWIRF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while TWIRF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and TWIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWIRF's competition here
CIAFF vs IRNRF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIAFF.Check IRNRF's competition here
CIAFF vs GSIH Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and GSIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSIH's competition here
CIAFF vs NPSTF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CIAFF has daily volatility of 0.00 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.Check NPSTF's competition here
CIAFF vs CWRN Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and CWRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWRN's competition here
CIAFF vs ZNGGF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and ZNGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZNGGF's competition here
CIAFF vs HMTLF Comparison July 2025
CIAFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIAFF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIAFF is priced at $2.76, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.80, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CIAFF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIAFF and HMTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTLF's competition here