The Cigna Group
The Cigna Group (CI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI | $304.35 | +1.13% | 81.2B | 16.68 | $18.24 | +1.91% |
| UNH | $307.42 | +1.34% | 278.4B | 13.32 | $23.08 | +2.78% |
| ANTM | $482.58 | +2.71% | 114.6B | 18.99 | $25.41 | N/A |
| CVS | $71.30 | -0.18% | 90.4B | 19.86 | $3.59 | +3.74% |
| ELV | $316.55 | +2.24% | 71.2B | 13.42 | $23.56 | +2.11% |
| HUM | $299.51 | +1.71% | 36B | 22.96 | $13.05 | +1.18% |
| CNC | $29.41 | +2.08% | 14.4B | 7.13 | $4.12 | N/A |
| MOH | $174.44 | +0.93% | 9.4B | 8.59 | $20.28 | N/A |
| OSCR | $16.80 | +8.95% | 4.3B | -24.36 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| ALHC | $15.84 | +0.25% | 3.1B | -58.63 | -$0.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CI vs UNH Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, UNH has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while UNH trades at $307.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas UNH's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to UNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check UNH's competition here
CI vs ANTM Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, ANTM has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while ANTM trades at $482.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ANTM's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANTM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to ANTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check ANTM's competition here
CI vs CVS Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, CVS has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while CVS trades at $71.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas CVS's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is more volatile compared to CVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check CVS's competition here
CI vs ELV Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, ELV has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while ELV trades at $316.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ELV's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to ELV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check ELV's competition here
CI vs HUM Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, HUM has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while HUM trades at $299.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas HUM's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is more volatile compared to HUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check HUM's competition here
CI vs CNC Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, CNC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while CNC trades at $29.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas CNC's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is more volatile compared to CNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check CNC's competition here
CI vs MOH Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, MOH has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while MOH trades at $174.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas MOH's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to MOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check MOH's competition here
CI vs OSCR Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, OSCR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while OSCR trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas OSCR's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSCR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to OSCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check OSCR's competition here
CI vs ALHC Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, ALHC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while ALHC trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ALHC's P/E ratio is -58.63. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to ALHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check ALHC's competition here
CI vs CLOV Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, CLOV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while CLOV trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas CLOV's P/E ratio is -34.12. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLOV's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to CLOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check CLOV's competition here
CI vs BHG Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, BHG has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while BHG trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BHG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHG's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to BHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check BHG's competition here
CI vs BMGL Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, BMGL has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while BMGL trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BMGL's P/E ratio is 198.00. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMGL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to BMGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check BMGL's competition here
CI vs MRAI Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, MRAI has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while MRAI trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas MRAI's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRAI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to MRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check MRAI's competition here
CI vs NIVF Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, NIVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while NIVF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas NIVF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to NIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check NIVF's competition here
CI vs IVF Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, IVF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while IVF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas IVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVF's ROE of -5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is less volatile compared to IVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check IVF's competition here
CI vs GTS Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, GTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while GTS trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas GTS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is more volatile compared to GTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check GTS's competition here
CI vs MGLN Comparison August 2025
CI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CI stands at 81.2B. In comparison, MGLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CI is priced at $304.35, while MGLN trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CI currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas MGLN's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, CI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CI is more volatile compared to MGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CI.Check MGLN's competition here