Coherus Oncology, Inc.
Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CHRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRS | $1.63 | -1.81% | 190.9M | -1.04 | -$1.56 | N/A |
| VRTX | $433.07 | -4.56% | 110B | 28.31 | $15.30 | N/A |
| REGN | $737.71 | -2.51% | 76.7B | 17.80 | $41.45 | +0.48% |
| VRNA | $106.91 | +0.11% | 72.7B | -102.80 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ARGX | $691.40 | -0.21% | 42.8B | 35.39 | $19.55 | N/A |
| ALNY | $317.36 | -3.29% | 42.1B | 135.74 | $2.34 | N/A |
| INSM | $145.30 | -1.56% | 31.3B | -22.63 | -$6.42 | N/A |
| UTHR | $522.83 | -1.82% | 22.9B | 18.78 | $27.84 | N/A |
| BNTX | $85.68 | -2.04% | 21.5B | -15.92 | -$5.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CHRS vs VRTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while VRTX trades at $433.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check VRTX's competition here
CHRS vs REGN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while REGN trades at $737.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check REGN's competition here
CHRS vs VRNA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while VRNA trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check VRNA's competition here
CHRS vs SGEN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check SGEN's competition here
CHRS vs ARGX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ARGX trades at $691.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ARGX's competition here
CHRS vs ALNY Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ALNY trades at $317.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 135.74. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ALNY's competition here
CHRS vs INSM Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while INSM trades at $145.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -22.63. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check INSM's competition here
CHRS vs UTHR Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while UTHR trades at $522.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check UTHR's competition here
CHRS vs BNTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while BNTX trades at $85.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check BNTX's competition here
CHRS vs BGNE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check BGNE's competition here
CHRS vs RPRX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RPRX trades at $46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RPRX's competition here
CHRS vs MRNA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MRNA trades at $49.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MRNA's competition here
CHRS vs ROIV Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ROIV trades at $26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ROIV's competition here
CHRS vs DNA-WT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check DNA-WT's competition here
CHRS vs RVMD Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RVMD trades at $92.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RVMD's competition here
CHRS vs INCY Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while INCY trades at $90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check INCY's competition here
CHRS vs GMAB Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while GMAB trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check GMAB's competition here
CHRS vs BBIO Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while BBIO trades at $69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check BBIO's competition here
CHRS vs ASND Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ASND trades at $216.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -49.65. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ASND's competition here
CHRS vs KRTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check KRTX's competition here
CHRS vs SMMT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while SMMT trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check SMMT's competition here
CHRS vs IONS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while IONS trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -30.32. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check IONS's competition here
CHRS vs MDGL Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MDGL trades at $510.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -39.68. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MDGL's competition here
CHRS vs RNAM Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RNAM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RNAM's competition here
CHRS vs JAZZ Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while JAZZ trades at $182.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is -31.23. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check JAZZ's competition here
CHRS vs EXEL Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while EXEL trades at $41.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check EXEL's competition here
CHRS vs BMRN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while BMRN trades at $54.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check BMRN's competition here
CHRS vs RXDX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RXDX's competition here
CHRS vs IMGN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check IMGN's competition here
CHRS vs BPMC Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check BPMC's competition here
CHRS vs CERE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CERE's competition here
CHRS vs ARWR Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ARWR trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ARWR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ARWR's competition here
CHRS vs AXSM Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while AXSM trades at $156.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -42.64. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check AXSM's competition here
CHRS vs TECH Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while TECH trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 96.13. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check TECH's competition here
CHRS vs CYTK Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CYTK trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CYTK's competition here
CHRS vs PCVX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while PCVX trades at $53.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check PCVX's competition here
CHRS vs IBRX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while IBRX trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -19.42. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check IBRX's competition here
CHRS vs MTSR Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MTSR trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MTSR's competition here
CHRS vs HALO Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while HALO trades at $61.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to HALO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check HALO's competition here
CHRS vs KRYS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while KRYS trades at $245.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check KRYS's competition here
CHRS vs NUVL Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while NUVL trades at $96.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -16.52. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check NUVL's competition here
CHRS vs MRUS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MRUS trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MRUS's competition here
CHRS vs ABVX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ABVX trades at $102.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ABVX's ROE of +50.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ABVX's competition here
CHRS vs ACLX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ACLX trades at $114.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.15. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ACLX's competition here
CHRS vs RETA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RETA's competition here
CHRS vs KYMR Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while KYMR trades at $78.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -21.18. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check KYMR's competition here
CHRS vs PTGX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while PTGX trades at $98.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -48.28. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check PTGX's competition here
CHRS vs PRAX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while PRAX trades at $290.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -21.52. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check PRAX's competition here
CHRS vs BLTE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while BLTE trades at $152.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -66.02. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check BLTE's competition here
CHRS vs COGT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while COGT trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -16.71. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to COGT's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check COGT's competition here
CHRS vs CDTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CDTX trades at $221.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CDTX's competition here
CHRS vs ABCM Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ABCM's competition here
CHRS vs ISEE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ISEE's competition here
CHRS vs PTCT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while PTCT trades at $66.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check PTCT's competition here
CHRS vs CGON Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CGON trades at $64.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -31.52. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CGON's competition here
CHRS vs FBIOX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while FBIOX trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check FBIOX's competition here
CHRS vs RYTM Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RYTM trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RYTM's competition here
CHRS vs CELC Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CELC trades at $106.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -27.97. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CELC's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CELC's competition here
CHRS vs TGTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while TGTX trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check TGTX's competition here
CHRS vs ALKS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ALKS trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ALKS's competition here
CHRS vs SRRK Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while SRRK trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check SRRK's competition here
CHRS vs IMVT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while IMVT trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check IMVT's competition here
CHRS vs CAI Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CAI trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CAI's competition here
CHRS vs TERN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while TERN trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -51.88. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check TERN's competition here
CHRS vs ERAS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ERAS trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -34.02. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ERAS's competition here
CHRS vs FOLD Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while FOLD trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -160.11. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check FOLD's competition here
CHRS vs AKRO Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while AKRO trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check AKRO's competition here
CHRS vs ALPN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ALPN's competition here
CHRS vs MIRM Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MIRM trades at $88.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -188.28. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MIRM's competition here
CHRS vs CRSP Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CRSP trades at $45.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CRSP's competition here
CHRS vs APGE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while APGE trades at $77.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check APGE's competition here
CHRS vs XENE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while XENE trades at $54.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check XENE's competition here
CHRS vs OPT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to OPT's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check OPT's competition here
CHRS vs MRTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MRTX's competition here
CHRS vs CORT Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CORT trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 45.85. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CORT's competition here
CHRS vs LGND Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while LGND trades at $195.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check LGND's competition here
CHRS vs CNTA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CNTA trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CNTA's competition here
CHRS vs VKTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while VKTX trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check VKTX's competition here
CHRS vs RYZB Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check RYZB's competition here
CHRS vs CBAY Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CBAY's competition here
CHRS vs SWTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check SWTX's competition here
CHRS vs ACAD Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ACAD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ACAD's competition here
CHRS vs CRNX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CRNX trades at $33.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CRNX's competition here
CHRS vs NAMS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while NAMS trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check NAMS's competition here
CHRS vs KNSA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while KNSA trades at $45.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check KNSA's competition here
CHRS vs EWTX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while EWTX trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check EWTX's competition here
CHRS vs TLX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while TLX trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is -460.00. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to TLX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check TLX's competition here
CHRS vs DNTH Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, DNTH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while DNTH trades at $81.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DNTH's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to DNTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to DNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check DNTH's competition here
CHRS vs LEGN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while LEGN trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check LEGN's competition here
CHRS vs LQDA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while LQDA trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is -43.79. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to LQDA's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check LQDA's competition here
CHRS vs ALMS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, ALMS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while ALMS trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ALMS's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to ALMS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to ALMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check ALMS's competition here
CHRS vs DNLI Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while DNLI trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check DNLI's competition here
CHRS vs CPRX Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while CPRX trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check CPRX's competition here
CHRS vs MORF Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MORF's competition here
CHRS vs SYRE Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, SYRE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while SYRE trades at $47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SYRE's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to SYRE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is more volatile compared to SYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check SYRE's competition here
CHRS vs MOR Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to MOR's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check MOR's competition here
CHRS vs DYN Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, DYN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while DYN trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DYN's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to DYN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to DYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check DYN's competition here
CHRS vs TARS Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, TARS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while TARS trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas TARS's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to TARS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to TARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check TARS's competition here
CHRS vs VERA Comparison April 2026
CHRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHRS stands at 190.9M. In comparison, VERA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHRS is priced at $1.63, while VERA trades at $38.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VERA's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, CHRS's ROE is +7.89%, compared to VERA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CHRS is less volatile compared to VERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHRS.Check VERA's competition here