Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. 8.20% Notes due 2028
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. 8.20% Notes due 2028 CGBDL Peers
See (CGBDL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBDL | $25.83 | -0.08% | 1.02B | N/A | N/A | +5.95% |
| BNJ | $15.08 | -1.50% | 96.34B | N/A | N/A | +0.55% |
| SFB | $20.34 | -0.67% | 10.04B | N/A | N/A | +1.73% |
| MGR | $20.53 | -0.58% | 5.20B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.20 | -1.04% | 5.17B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRB | $16.92 | -0.65% | 5.13B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1.01B | N/A | N/A | +13.82% |
| FCRX | $24.80 | +0.20% | 919.13M | 174.65 | $0.14 | +5.05% |
| BULLW | $2.86 | -8.49% | 856.91M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GLADZ | $25.86 | +0.31% | 577.43M | N/A | N/A | +5.62% |
Stock Comparison
CGBDL vs BNJ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 96.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while BNJ trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SFB Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 10.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while SFB trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs MGR Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while MGR trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs MGRD Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while MGRD trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs MGRB Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while MGRB trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs TRINL Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs FCRX Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 919.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while FCRX trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 174.65. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs BULLW Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 856.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while BULLW trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BULLW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GLADZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 577.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while GLADZ trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL and GLADZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGBDL vs SAZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 393.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while SAZ trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SAY Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 392.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while SAY trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SAJ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 389.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while SAJ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL and SAJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGBDL vs WHFCL Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 217.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while WHFCL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GECCZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 123.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while GECCZ trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL and GECCZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGBDL vs BTMWW Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 113.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while BTMWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs RILYZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 99.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while RILYZ trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GEGGL Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 53.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while GEGGL trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL and GEGGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGBDL vs ZBAI Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 17.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while ZBAI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs STSB Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs CAS Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 10.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while CAS trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs HBTA Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1.02B. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 937262.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.83, while HBTA trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.