Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. 8.20% Notes due 2028
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. 8.20% Notes due 2028 CGBDL Peers
See (CGBDL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBDL | $25.62 | -0.51% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +8.00% |
| BNJ | $15.10 | -0.79% | 87.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.56% |
| SFB | $20.50 | -1.61% | 9.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.82% |
| MGRD | $14.98 | -0.11% | 5.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGR | $20.52 | -0.29% | 5.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRB | $16.63 | -0.78% | 5.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +14.04% |
| FCRX | $24.71 | +0.28% | 915.8M | 174.01 | $0.14 | +5.06% |
| GLADZ | $25.30 | -0.78% | 587.3M | N/A | N/A | +7.64% |
| BULLW | $3.45 | +4.55% | 480.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CGBDL vs BNJ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while BNJ trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SFB Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while SFB trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs MGRD Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while MGRD trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs MGR Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while MGR trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs MGRB Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while MGRB trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs TRINL Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs FCRX Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 915.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while FCRX trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 174.01. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GLADZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 587.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while GLADZ trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs BULLW Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 480.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while BULLW trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SAJ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while SAJ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SAY Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 388.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while SAY trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs SAZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 387.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while SAZ trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs BTMWW Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while BTMWW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs WHFCL Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 210.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while WHFCL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GECCZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while GECCZ trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs RILYZ Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while RILYZ trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GEGGL Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while GEGGL trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs STSB Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs CAS Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while CAS trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs ZBAI Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while ZBAI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs HBTA Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 960.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while HBTA trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is less volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.
CGBDL vs GJH Comparison
CGBDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBDL stands at 1B. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGBDL is priced at $25.62, while GJH trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBDL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBDL's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGBDL is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBDL.