Cera Sanitaryware Limited
Cera Sanitaryware Limited (CERA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CERA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERA.BO | ₹4,753.95 | +0.00% | 61.2B | 28.86 | ₹164.49 | +1.37% |
| SUPREMEIND.NS | ₹3,843.40 | +0.00% | 487.1B | 59.75 | ₹64.17 | +0.91% |
| SUPREMEIND.BO | ₹3,844.50 | +0.00% | 486.2B | 59.74 | ₹64.07 | +0.91% |
| ASTRAL.NS | ₹1,640.40 | +0.00% | 438.4B | 87.31 | ₹18.69 | +0.23% |
| ASTRAL.BO | ₹1,640.80 | +0.00% | 438.3B | 87.35 | ₹18.68 | +0.23% |
| BLUESTARCO.BO | ₹1,733.10 | +0.00% | 350.9B | 70.95 | ₹24.06 | +0.53% |
| GRINDWELL.BO | ₹1,395.80 | +0.00% | 155.4B | 40.83 | ₹34.38 | +1.21% |
| GRINDWELL.NS | ₹1,392.60 | +0.00% | 155.3B | 39.87 | ₹35.17 | +1.21% |
| KAJARIACER.BO | ₹920.40 | +0.00% | 151.7B | 37.38 | ₹25.48 | +1.26% |
| KAJARIACER.NS | ₹921.35 | +0.00% | 151.5B | 37.41 | ₹25.43 | +1.26% |
Stock Comparison
CERA.BO vs SUPREMEIND.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.NS has a market cap of 487.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while SUPREMEIND.NS trades at ₹3,843.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas SUPREMEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUPREMEIND.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SUPREMEIND.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.BO has a market cap of 486.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while SUPREMEIND.BO trades at ₹3,844.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas SUPREMEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 59.74. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUPREMEIND.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASTRAL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ASTRAL.NS has a market cap of 438.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ASTRAL.NS trades at ₹1,640.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ASTRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 87.31. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASTRAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASTRAL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASTRAL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ASTRAL.BO has a market cap of 438.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ASTRAL.BO trades at ₹1,640.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ASTRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 87.35. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASTRAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASTRAL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 350.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,733.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 70.95. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs GRINDWELL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.BO has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while GRINDWELL.BO trades at ₹1,395.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas GRINDWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRINDWELL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to GRINDWELL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check GRINDWELL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs GRINDWELL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.NS has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while GRINDWELL.NS trades at ₹1,392.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas GRINDWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.87. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRINDWELL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to GRINDWELL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check GRINDWELL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs KAJARIACER.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.BO has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while KAJARIACER.BO trades at ₹920.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas KAJARIACER.BO's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAJARIACER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KAJARIACER.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs KAJARIACER.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.NS has a market cap of 151.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while KAJARIACER.NS trades at ₹921.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas KAJARIACER.NS's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAJARIACER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KAJARIACER.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs FINPIPE.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, FINPIPE.NS has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while FINPIPE.NS trades at ₹174.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas FINPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to FINPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check FINPIPE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs CERA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, CERA.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while CERA.NS trades at ₹4,758.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas CERA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CERA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to CERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check CERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹239.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 61.21. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs POKARNA.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, POKARNA.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while POKARNA.BO trades at ₹835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas POKARNA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POKARNA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to POKARNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check POKARNA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs POKARNA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, POKARNA.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while POKARNA.NS trades at ₹835.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas POKARNA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POKARNA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to POKARNA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check POKARNA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs RAMCOIND.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while RAMCOIND.NS trades at ₹253.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas RAMCOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMCOIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to RAMCOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check RAMCOIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs RAMCOIND.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while RAMCOIND.BO trades at ₹254.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas RAMCOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMCOIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to RAMCOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check RAMCOIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs NITCO.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, NITCO.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while NITCO.NS trades at ₹81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas NITCO.NS's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NITCO.NS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to NITCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check NITCO.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs NITCO.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, NITCO.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while NITCO.BO trades at ₹81.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas NITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NITCO.BO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to NITCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check NITCO.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs APOLLOPIPE.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while APOLLOPIPE.NS trades at ₹391.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas APOLLOPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 115.51. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check APOLLOPIPE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SOMANYCERA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while SOMANYCERA.NS trades at ₹379.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas SOMANYCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOMANYCERA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SOMANYCERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SOMANYCERA.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while SOMANYCERA.BO trades at ₹378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas SOMANYCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOMANYCERA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SOMANYCERA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASIANTILES.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ASIANTILES.NS trades at ₹59.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ASIANTILES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASIANTILES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASIANTILES.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASIANTILES.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ASIANTILES.BO trades at ₹59.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ASIANTILES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASIANTILES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASIANTILES.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs HIL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, HIL.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while HIL.NS trades at ₹1,845.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas HIL.NS's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to HIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HIL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs HIL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, HIL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while HIL.BO trades at ₹1,843.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas HIL.BO's P/E ratio is -42.18. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to HIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HIL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs HARDWYN.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, HARDWYN.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while HARDWYN.NS trades at ₹17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas HARDWYN.NS's P/E ratio is 78.38. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HARDWYN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HARDWYN.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs HARDWYN.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, HARDWYN.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while HARDWYN.BO trades at ₹17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas HARDWYN.BO's P/E ratio is 78.08. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HARDWYN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HARDWYN.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs BIGBLOC.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while BIGBLOC.NS trades at ₹50.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas BIGBLOC.NS's P/E ratio is -455.64. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIGBLOC.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BIGBLOC.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs BIGBLOC.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while BIGBLOC.BO trades at ₹50.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas BIGBLOC.BO's P/E ratio is -455.36. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIGBLOC.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to BIGBLOC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BIGBLOC.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs EVERESTIND.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while EVERESTIND.NS trades at ₹321.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas EVERESTIND.NS's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVERESTIND.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to EVERESTIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EVERESTIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EVERESTIND.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while EVERESTIND.BO trades at ₹323.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas EVERESTIND.BO's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVERESTIND.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to EVERESTIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EVERESTIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs VISAKAIND.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while VISAKAIND.BO trades at ₹57.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas VISAKAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VISAKAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to VISAKAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check VISAKAIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs VISAKAIND.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while VISAKAIND.NS trades at ₹56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas VISAKAIND.NS's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VISAKAIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to VISAKAIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check VISAKAIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SEJALLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SEJALLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while SEJALLTD.NS trades at ₹492.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas SEJALLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEJALLTD.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SEJALLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SEJALLTD.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs PPL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, PPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while PPL.BO trades at ₹189.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas PPL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to PPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PPL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs PPL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, PPL.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while PPL.NS trades at ₹187.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas PPL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to PPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PPL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTBELL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ORIENTBELL.BO trades at ₹270.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ORIENTBELL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORIENTBELL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTBELL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTBELL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ORIENTBELL.NS trades at ₹273.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ORIENTBELL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.17. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORIENTBELL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTBELL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs KRITI.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, KRITI.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while KRITI.NS trades at ₹74.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas KRITI.NS's P/E ratio is -54.04. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRITI.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to KRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KRITI.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EXXARO.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, EXXARO.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while EXXARO.BO trades at ₹6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas EXXARO.BO's P/E ratio is 49.14. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXXARO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to EXXARO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EXXARO.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs EXXARO.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, EXXARO.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while EXXARO.NS trades at ₹6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas EXXARO.NS's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXXARO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to EXXARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EXXARO.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SAHYADRI.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SAHYADRI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while SAHYADRI.BO trades at ₹235.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas SAHYADRI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAHYADRI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SAHYADRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SAHYADRI.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs MURUDCERA.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while MURUDCERA.BO trades at ₹29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas MURUDCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MURUDCERA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to MURUDCERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MURUDCERA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs MURUDCERA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while MURUDCERA.NS trades at ₹30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas MURUDCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MURUDCERA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to MURUDCERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MURUDCERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs BEARDSELL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while BEARDSELL.BO trades at ₹37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas BEARDSELL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEARDSELL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BEARDSELL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs TEXMOPIPES.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while TEXMOPIPES.NS trades at ₹40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas TEXMOPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TEXMOPIPES.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs TEXMOPIPES.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while TEXMOPIPES.BO trades at ₹41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas TEXMOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TEXMOPIPES.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs REGENCERAM.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while REGENCERAM.NS trades at ₹42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas REGENCERAM.NS's P/E ratio is 1027.25. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REGENCERAM.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check REGENCERAM.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs REGENCERAM.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while REGENCERAM.BO trades at ₹39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas REGENCERAM.BO's P/E ratio is 1020.00. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REGENCERAM.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to REGENCERAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check REGENCERAM.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs BEARDSELL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.NS has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while BEARDSELL.NS trades at ₹22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas BEARDSELL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEARDSELL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BEARDSELL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs LEXUS.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, LEXUS.NS has a market cap of 581.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while LEXUS.NS trades at ₹30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas LEXUS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEXUS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to LEXUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check LEXUS.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs AHLADA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, AHLADA.NS has a market cap of 508.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while AHLADA.NS trades at ₹39.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas AHLADA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHLADA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to AHLADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check AHLADA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTALTL.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.NS has a market cap of 374.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ORIENTALTL.NS trades at ₹5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ORIENTALTL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORIENTALTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTALTL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTALTL.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.BO has a market cap of 373.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while ORIENTALTL.BO trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas ORIENTALTL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORIENTALTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTALTL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs AROGRANITE.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.NS has a market cap of 349M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while AROGRANITE.NS trades at ₹23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas AROGRANITE.NS's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AROGRANITE.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check AROGRANITE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs AROGRANITE.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.BO has a market cap of 347.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while AROGRANITE.BO trades at ₹23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas AROGRANITE.BO's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AROGRANITE.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check AROGRANITE.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs MADHAV.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, MADHAV.NS has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while MADHAV.NS trades at ₹33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas MADHAV.NS's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MADHAV.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to MADHAV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MADHAV.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs MADHAV.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, MADHAV.BO has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while MADHAV.BO trades at ₹34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas MADHAV.BO's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MADHAV.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to MADHAV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MADHAV.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs TIJARIA.BO Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, TIJARIA.BO has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while TIJARIA.BO trades at ₹4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas TIJARIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIJARIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TIJARIA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs TIJARIA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, TIJARIA.NS has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while TIJARIA.NS trades at ₹4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas TIJARIA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIJARIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TIJARIA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EUROCERA.NS Comparison March 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 61.2B. In comparison, EUROCERA.NS has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹4,753.95, while EUROCERA.NS trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.86, whereas EUROCERA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUROCERA.NS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to EUROCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EUROCERA.NS's competition here