Madhav Marbles and Granites Limited
Madhav Marbles and Granites Limited (MADHAV.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MADHAV.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MADHAV.BO | ₹34.50 | +0.00% | 308.7M | -16.35 | -₹2.11 | N/A |
| SUPREMEIND.BO | ₹3,805.90 | +0.93% | 483.5B | 59.72 | ₹63.73 | +0.92% |
| SUPREMEIND.NS | ₹3,802.40 | +0.81% | 483B | 59.30 | ₹64.12 | +0.92% |
| ASTRAL.BO | ₹1,630.60 | +4.27% | 438.1B | 86.87 | ₹18.77 | +0.23% |
| ASTRAL.NS | ₹1,630.00 | +4.24% | 437.9B | 86.89 | ₹18.76 | +0.23% |
| BLUESTARCO.BO | ₹1,689.55 | +2.14% | 347.4B | 70.22 | ₹24.06 | +0.53% |
| KAJARIACER.NS | ₹1,120.70 | +2.40% | 178.5B | 41.51 | ₹27.00 | +1.07% |
| KAJARIACER.BO | ₹1,119.35 | +2.33% | 178.3B | 43.93 | ₹25.48 | +1.07% |
| GRINDWELL.BO | ₹1,538.10 | +3.15% | 170.3B | 44.74 | ₹34.38 | +1.11% |
| GRINDWELL.NS | ₹1,536.60 | +2.96% | 170.1B | 43.64 | ₹35.21 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
MADHAV.BO vs SUPREMEIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.BO has a market cap of 483.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while SUPREMEIND.BO trades at ₹3,805.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas SUPREMEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 59.72. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUPREMEIND.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs SUPREMEIND.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.NS has a market cap of 483B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while SUPREMEIND.NS trades at ₹3,802.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas SUPREMEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 59.30. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUPREMEIND.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ASTRAL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ASTRAL.BO has a market cap of 438.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ASTRAL.BO trades at ₹1,630.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ASTRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 86.87. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASTRAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ASTRAL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ASTRAL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ASTRAL.NS has a market cap of 437.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ASTRAL.NS trades at ₹1,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ASTRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 86.89. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASTRAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ASTRAL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,689.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 70.22. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs KAJARIACER.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, KAJARIACER.NS has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while KAJARIACER.NS trades at ₹1,120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas KAJARIACER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KAJARIACER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to KAJARIACER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check KAJARIACER.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs KAJARIACER.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, KAJARIACER.BO has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while KAJARIACER.BO trades at ₹1,119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas KAJARIACER.BO's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KAJARIACER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to KAJARIACER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check KAJARIACER.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs GRINDWELL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, GRINDWELL.BO has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while GRINDWELL.BO trades at ₹1,538.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas GRINDWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRINDWELL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to GRINDWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check GRINDWELL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs GRINDWELL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, GRINDWELL.NS has a market cap of 170.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while GRINDWELL.NS trades at ₹1,536.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas GRINDWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRINDWELL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to GRINDWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check GRINDWELL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs FINPIPE.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, FINPIPE.NS has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while FINPIPE.NS trades at ₹164.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas FINPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FINPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to FINPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check FINPIPE.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs CERA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, CERA.NS has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while CERA.NS trades at ₹5,162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas CERA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CERA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to CERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check CERA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs CERA.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, CERA.BO has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while CERA.BO trades at ₹5,152.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas CERA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CERA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to CERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check CERA.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs POKARNA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, POKARNA.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while POKARNA.NS trades at ₹896.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas POKARNA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POKARNA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to POKARNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check POKARNA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs POKARNA.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, POKARNA.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while POKARNA.BO trades at ₹894.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas POKARNA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POKARNA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to POKARNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check POKARNA.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹239.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs RAMCOIND.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, RAMCOIND.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while RAMCOIND.NS trades at ₹266.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas RAMCOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAMCOIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check RAMCOIND.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs RAMCOIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, RAMCOIND.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while RAMCOIND.BO trades at ₹267.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas RAMCOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAMCOIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check RAMCOIND.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs NITCO.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, NITCO.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while NITCO.BO trades at ₹85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas NITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NITCO.BO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to NITCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check NITCO.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs NITCO.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, NITCO.NS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while NITCO.NS trades at ₹85.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas NITCO.NS's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NITCO.NS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to NITCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check NITCO.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs APOLLOPIPE.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while APOLLOPIPE.NS trades at ₹438.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas APOLLOPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 127.87. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check APOLLOPIPE.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs SOMANYCERA.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.BO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while SOMANYCERA.BO trades at ₹427.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas SOMANYCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOMANYCERA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check SOMANYCERA.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs SOMANYCERA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.NS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while SOMANYCERA.NS trades at ₹426.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas SOMANYCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOMANYCERA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check SOMANYCERA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ASIANTILES.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ASIANTILES.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ASIANTILES.NS trades at ₹69.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ASIANTILES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASIANTILES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ASIANTILES.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ASIANTILES.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ASIANTILES.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ASIANTILES.BO trades at ₹69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ASIANTILES.BO's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASIANTILES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ASIANTILES.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs HIL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, HIL.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while HIL.NS trades at ₹1,845.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas HIL.NS's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to HIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check HIL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs HIL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, HIL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while HIL.BO trades at ₹1,843.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas HIL.BO's P/E ratio is -42.18. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HIL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to HIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check HIL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs HARDWYN.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, HARDWYN.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while HARDWYN.BO trades at ₹20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas HARDWYN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.17. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HARDWYN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check HARDWYN.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs HARDWYN.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, HARDWYN.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while HARDWYN.NS trades at ₹20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas HARDWYN.NS's P/E ratio is 87.13. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HARDWYN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check HARDWYN.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs BIGBLOC.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, BIGBLOC.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while BIGBLOC.NS trades at ₹50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas BIGBLOC.NS's P/E ratio is -455.73. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BIGBLOC.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check BIGBLOC.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs BIGBLOC.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, BIGBLOC.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while BIGBLOC.BO trades at ₹50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas BIGBLOC.BO's P/E ratio is -454.55. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BIGBLOC.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check BIGBLOC.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs SEJALLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, SEJALLTD.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while SEJALLTD.NS trades at ₹617.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas SEJALLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEJALLTD.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to SEJALLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check SEJALLTD.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs KRITIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, KRITIIND.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while KRITIIND.BO trades at ₹117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas KRITIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRITIIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to KRITIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check KRITIIND.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs VISAKAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, VISAKAIND.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while VISAKAIND.BO trades at ₹64.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas VISAKAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VISAKAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to VISAKAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check VISAKAIND.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs VISAKAIND.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, VISAKAIND.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while VISAKAIND.NS trades at ₹64.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas VISAKAIND.NS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VISAKAIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to VISAKAIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check VISAKAIND.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs EVERESTIND.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, EVERESTIND.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while EVERESTIND.NS trades at ₹334.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas EVERESTIND.NS's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVERESTIND.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to EVERESTIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check EVERESTIND.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs EVERESTIND.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, EVERESTIND.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while EVERESTIND.BO trades at ₹332.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas EVERESTIND.BO's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVERESTIND.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to EVERESTIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check EVERESTIND.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs PPL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, PPL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while PPL.NS trades at ₹210.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas PPL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to PPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check PPL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs PPL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, PPL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while PPL.BO trades at ₹209.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas PPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to PPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check PPL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs KRITI.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, KRITI.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while KRITI.NS trades at ₹80.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas KRITI.NS's P/E ratio is -63.05. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRITI.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to KRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check KRITI.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ORIENTBELL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ORIENTBELL.NS trades at ₹279.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ORIENTBELL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIENTBELL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ORIENTBELL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ORIENTBELL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ORIENTBELL.BO trades at ₹278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ORIENTBELL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIENTBELL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ORIENTBELL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs EXXARO.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, EXXARO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while EXXARO.BO trades at ₹7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas EXXARO.BO's P/E ratio is 52.43. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EXXARO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to EXXARO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check EXXARO.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs EXXARO.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, EXXARO.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while EXXARO.NS trades at ₹7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas EXXARO.NS's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EXXARO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to EXXARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check EXXARO.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs SAHYADRI.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, SAHYADRI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while SAHYADRI.BO trades at ₹239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas SAHYADRI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAHYADRI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO and SAHYADRI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAHYADRI.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs MURUDCERA.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, MURUDCERA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while MURUDCERA.BO trades at ₹32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas MURUDCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MURUDCERA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check MURUDCERA.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs MURUDCERA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, MURUDCERA.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while MURUDCERA.NS trades at ₹31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas MURUDCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MURUDCERA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check MURUDCERA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs BEARDSELL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, BEARDSELL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while BEARDSELL.BO trades at ₹37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas BEARDSELL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEARDSELL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check BEARDSELL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs TEXMOPIPES.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while TEXMOPIPES.NS trades at ₹45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas TEXMOPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check TEXMOPIPES.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs TEXMOPIPES.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while TEXMOPIPES.BO trades at ₹45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas TEXMOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check TEXMOPIPES.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs REGENCERAM.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, REGENCERAM.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while REGENCERAM.BO trades at ₹46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas REGENCERAM.BO's P/E ratio is 1174.75. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REGENCERAM.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check REGENCERAM.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs REGENCERAM.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, REGENCERAM.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while REGENCERAM.NS trades at ₹46.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas REGENCERAM.NS's P/E ratio is 1165.00. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REGENCERAM.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check REGENCERAM.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs BEARDSELL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, BEARDSELL.NS has a market cap of 989.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while BEARDSELL.NS trades at ₹25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas BEARDSELL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEARDSELL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check BEARDSELL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs AHLADA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, AHLADA.NS has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while AHLADA.NS trades at ₹44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas AHLADA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AHLADA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to AHLADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check AHLADA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ORIENTALTL.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.BO has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ORIENTALTL.BO trades at ₹7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ORIENTALTL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIENTALTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ORIENTALTL.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs ORIENTALTL.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.NS has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while ORIENTALTL.NS trades at ₹7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas ORIENTALTL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIENTALTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check ORIENTALTL.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs LEXUS.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, LEXUS.NS has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while LEXUS.NS trades at ₹21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas LEXUS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LEXUS.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO and LEXUS.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LEXUS.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs AROGRANITE.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, AROGRANITE.BO has a market cap of 377M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while AROGRANITE.BO trades at ₹24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas AROGRANITE.BO's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AROGRANITE.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check AROGRANITE.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs AROGRANITE.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, AROGRANITE.NS has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while AROGRANITE.NS trades at ₹24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas AROGRANITE.NS's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AROGRANITE.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check AROGRANITE.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs MADHAV.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, MADHAV.NS has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while MADHAV.NS trades at ₹35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas MADHAV.NS's P/E ratio is -16.38. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MADHAV.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to MADHAV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check MADHAV.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs TIJARIA.BO Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, TIJARIA.BO has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while TIJARIA.BO trades at ₹4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas TIJARIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIJARIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check TIJARIA.BO's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs TIJARIA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, TIJARIA.NS has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while TIJARIA.NS trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas TIJARIA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIJARIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check TIJARIA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs EUROCERA.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, EUROCERA.NS has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while EUROCERA.NS trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas EUROCERA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EUROCERA.NS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MADHAV.BO is less volatile compared to EUROCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MADHAV.BO.Check EUROCERA.NS's competition here
MADHAV.BO vs TIL-RE.NS Comparison April 2026
MADHAV.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MADHAV.BO stands at 308.7M. In comparison, TIL-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MADHAV.BO is priced at ₹34.50, while TIL-RE.NS trades at ₹158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MADHAV.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -16.35, whereas TIL-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MADHAV.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIL-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MADHAV.BO has daily volatility of 0.00 and TIL-RE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TIL-RE.NS's competition here