Prakash Pipes Limited
Prakash Pipes Limited (PPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPL.NS | ₹186.73 | -1.27% | 4.5B | 11.15 | ₹16.74 | +1.82% |
| SUPREMEIND.NS | ₹3,508.70 | -0.01% | 445.7B | 46.72 | ₹75.10 | +1.00% |
| SUPREMEIND.BO | ₹3,506.40 | -0.12% | 445.4B | 46.73 | ₹75.04 | +1.00% |
| ASTRAL.BO | ₹1,555.00 | -0.46% | 417.8B | 83.29 | ₹18.67 | +0.24% |
| ASTRAL.NS | ₹1,550.80 | -0.67% | 416.6B | 83.02 | ₹18.68 | +0.24% |
| GRINDWELL.BO | ₹1,860.20 | +3.92% | 206B | 54.11 | ₹34.38 | +0.91% |
| GRINDWELL.NS | ₹1,859.90 | +3.68% | 205.9B | 49.61 | ₹37.49 | +0.91% |
| KAJARIACER.BO | ₹1,070.00 | +0.47% | 170.4B | 41.99 | ₹25.48 | +1.12% |
| KAJARIACER.NS | ₹1,064.40 | -0.03% | 170.1B | 42.01 | ₹25.42 | +1.12% |
| FINPIPE.NS | ₹165.97 | -1.85% | 102.6B | 20.44 | ₹8.12 | +2.17% |
Stock Comparison
PPL.NS vs SUPREMEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.NS has a market cap of 445.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while SUPREMEIND.NS trades at ₹3,508.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SUPREMEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.72. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUPREMEIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check SUPREMEIND.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs SUPREMEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.BO has a market cap of 445.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while SUPREMEIND.BO trades at ₹3,506.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SUPREMEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.73. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUPREMEIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check SUPREMEIND.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs ASTRAL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ASTRAL.BO has a market cap of 417.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ASTRAL.BO trades at ₹1,555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ASTRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 83.29. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTRAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ASTRAL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs ASTRAL.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ASTRAL.NS has a market cap of 416.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ASTRAL.NS trades at ₹1,550.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ASTRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 83.02. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTRAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ASTRAL.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs GRINDWELL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.BO has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while GRINDWELL.BO trades at ₹1,860.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas GRINDWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 54.11. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRINDWELL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to GRINDWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check GRINDWELL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs GRINDWELL.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.NS has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while GRINDWELL.NS trades at ₹1,859.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas GRINDWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 49.61. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRINDWELL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to GRINDWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check GRINDWELL.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs KAJARIACER.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.BO has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while KAJARIACER.BO trades at ₹1,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KAJARIACER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAJARIACER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check KAJARIACER.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs KAJARIACER.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.NS has a market cap of 170.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while KAJARIACER.NS trades at ₹1,064.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KAJARIACER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.01. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAJARIACER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check KAJARIACER.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs FINPIPE.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FINPIPE.NS has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while FINPIPE.NS trades at ₹165.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas FINPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FINPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to FINPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check FINPIPE.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs CERA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CERA.NS has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while CERA.NS trades at ₹5,635.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CERA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CERA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to CERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check CERA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs CERA.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CERA.BO has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while CERA.BO trades at ₹5,634.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas CERA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CERA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to CERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check CERA.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹251.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 64.40. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹251.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 64.35. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs POKARNA.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, POKARNA.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while POKARNA.BO trades at ₹837.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas POKARNA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POKARNA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to POKARNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check POKARNA.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs POKARNA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, POKARNA.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while POKARNA.NS trades at ₹834.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas POKARNA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POKARNA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to POKARNA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check POKARNA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs RAMCOIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while RAMCOIND.BO trades at ₹274.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas RAMCOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMCOIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMCOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check RAMCOIND.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs RAMCOIND.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while RAMCOIND.NS trades at ₹274.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas RAMCOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMCOIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMCOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check RAMCOIND.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs APOLLOPIPE.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while APOLLOPIPE.NS trades at ₹522.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas APOLLOPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 157.44. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check APOLLOPIPE.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs NITCO.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NITCO.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while NITCO.BO trades at ₹96.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas NITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NITCO.BO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to NITCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check NITCO.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs NITCO.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NITCO.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while NITCO.NS trades at ₹96.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas NITCO.NS's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NITCO.NS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to NITCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check NITCO.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs SOMANYCERA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while SOMANYCERA.NS trades at ₹445.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SOMANYCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMANYCERA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check SOMANYCERA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs SOMANYCERA.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while SOMANYCERA.BO trades at ₹444.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SOMANYCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMANYCERA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check SOMANYCERA.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs ASIANTILES.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ASIANTILES.NS trades at ₹60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ASIANTILES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASIANTILES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANTILES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ASIANTILES.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs ASIANTILES.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ASIANTILES.BO trades at ₹60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ASIANTILES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASIANTILES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANTILES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ASIANTILES.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs HIL.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HIL.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while HIL.NS trades at ₹1,845.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas HIL.NS's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to HIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check HIL.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs HIL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HIL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while HIL.BO trades at ₹1,843.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas HIL.BO's P/E ratio is -42.18. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to HIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check HIL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs HARDWYN.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HARDWYN.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while HARDWYN.NS trades at ₹23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas HARDWYN.NS's P/E ratio is 99.21. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HARDWYN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check HARDWYN.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs HARDWYN.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HARDWYN.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while HARDWYN.BO trades at ₹23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas HARDWYN.BO's P/E ratio is 99.21. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HARDWYN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check HARDWYN.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs SEJALLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SEJALLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while SEJALLTD.NS trades at ₹783.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas SEJALLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEJALLTD.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to SEJALLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check SEJALLTD.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs BIGBLOC.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while BIGBLOC.BO trades at ₹57.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas BIGBLOC.BO's P/E ratio is -521.73. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIGBLOC.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check BIGBLOC.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs BIGBLOC.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while BIGBLOC.NS trades at ₹57.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas BIGBLOC.NS's P/E ratio is -520.82. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIGBLOC.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check BIGBLOC.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs VISAKAIND.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while VISAKAIND.NS trades at ₹75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas VISAKAIND.NS's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VISAKAIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to VISAKAIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check VISAKAIND.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs VISAKAIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while VISAKAIND.BO trades at ₹75.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas VISAKAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VISAKAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to VISAKAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check VISAKAIND.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs EVERESTIND.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while EVERESTIND.NS trades at ₹380.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EVERESTIND.NS's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVERESTIND.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to EVERESTIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check EVERESTIND.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs EVERESTIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while EVERESTIND.BO trades at ₹375.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EVERESTIND.BO's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVERESTIND.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to EVERESTIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check EVERESTIND.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs KRITIIND.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KRITIIND.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while KRITIIND.BO trades at ₹117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KRITIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRITIIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to KRITIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check KRITIIND.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs ORIENTBELL.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ORIENTBELL.NS trades at ₹323.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ORIENTBELL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTBELL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ORIENTBELL.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs ORIENTBELL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ORIENTBELL.BO trades at ₹322.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ORIENTBELL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.08. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTBELL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ORIENTBELL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs PPL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while PPL.BO trades at ₹188.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas PPL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to PPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check PPL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs KRITI.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KRITI.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while KRITI.NS trades at ₹71.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas KRITI.NS's P/E ratio is -56.39. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRITI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to KRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check KRITI.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs EXXARO.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EXXARO.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while EXXARO.NS trades at ₹6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EXXARO.NS's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXXARO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to EXXARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check EXXARO.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs EXXARO.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EXXARO.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while EXXARO.BO trades at ₹6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EXXARO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.36. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXXARO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to EXXARO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check EXXARO.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs MURUDCERA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while MURUDCERA.NS trades at ₹33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MURUDCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MURUDCERA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check MURUDCERA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs MURUDCERA.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while MURUDCERA.BO trades at ₹33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MURUDCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MURUDCERA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check MURUDCERA.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs BEARDSELL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while BEARDSELL.BO trades at ₹37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas BEARDSELL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEARDSELL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check BEARDSELL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs TEXMOPIPES.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while TEXMOPIPES.BO trades at ₹45.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas TEXMOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check TEXMOPIPES.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs TEXMOPIPES.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while TEXMOPIPES.NS trades at ₹45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas TEXMOPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check TEXMOPIPES.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs REGENCERAM.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while REGENCERAM.NS trades at ₹43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas REGENCERAM.NS's P/E ratio is 1082.25. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REGENCERAM.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check REGENCERAM.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs REGENCERAM.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while REGENCERAM.BO trades at ₹41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas REGENCERAM.BO's P/E ratio is 1040.00. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REGENCERAM.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to REGENCERAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check REGENCERAM.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs BEARDSELL.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while BEARDSELL.NS trades at ₹25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas BEARDSELL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEARDSELL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check BEARDSELL.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs AHLADA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AHLADA.NS has a market cap of 551.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while AHLADA.NS trades at ₹42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AHLADA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHLADA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to AHLADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check AHLADA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs ORIENTALTL.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.NS has a market cap of 482.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ORIENTALTL.NS trades at ₹6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ORIENTALTL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTALTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ORIENTALTL.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs ORIENTALTL.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.BO has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while ORIENTALTL.BO trades at ₹6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas ORIENTALTL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTALTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check ORIENTALTL.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs AROGRANITE.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.NS has a market cap of 404.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while AROGRANITE.NS trades at ₹26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AROGRANITE.NS's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AROGRANITE.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check AROGRANITE.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs AROGRANITE.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.BO has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while AROGRANITE.BO trades at ₹26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas AROGRANITE.BO's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AROGRANITE.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to AROGRANITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check AROGRANITE.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs LEXUS.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LEXUS.NS has a market cap of 389.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while LEXUS.NS trades at ₹19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas LEXUS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEXUS.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to LEXUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check LEXUS.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs MADHAV.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MADHAV.NS has a market cap of 335.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while MADHAV.NS trades at ₹37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MADHAV.NS's P/E ratio is -17.78. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADHAV.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to MADHAV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check MADHAV.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs MADHAV.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MADHAV.BO has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while MADHAV.BO trades at ₹36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas MADHAV.BO's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADHAV.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to MADHAV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check MADHAV.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs TIJARIA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TIJARIA.NS has a market cap of 128.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while TIJARIA.NS trades at ₹4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas TIJARIA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIJARIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to TIJARIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check TIJARIA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs TIJARIA.BO Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TIJARIA.BO has a market cap of 128.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while TIJARIA.BO trades at ₹4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas TIJARIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIJARIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is more volatile compared to TIJARIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check TIJARIA.BO's competition here
PPL.NS vs EUROCERA.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EUROCERA.NS has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while EUROCERA.NS trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas EUROCERA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EUROCERA.NS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.NS is less volatile compared to EUROCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.NS.Check EUROCERA.NS's competition here
PPL.NS vs TIL-RE.NS Comparison May 2026
PPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.NS stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TIL-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.NS is priced at ₹186.73, while TIL-RE.NS trades at ₹158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.15, whereas TIL-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPL.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIL-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PPL.NS has daily volatility of 3.74 and TIL-RE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TIL-RE.NS's competition here