CEA Industries Inc.
CEA Industries Inc. CEADW Peers
See (CEADW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEADW | $0.03 | +57.23% | 19.7K | -0.01 | -$1.98 | N/A |
| CAT | $362.45 | +1.51% | 170.5B | 17.69 | $20.49 | +1.56% |
| DE | $524.43 | +2.91% | 142B | 25.35 | $20.69 | +1.18% |
| PCAR | $92.70 | +0.89% | 48.7B | 14.07 | $6.59 | +4.27% |
| CNH | $12.99 | +3.34% | 16.2B | 16.24 | $0.80 | +1.92% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | N/A |
| AGCO | $103.11 | +2.50% | 7.7B | -13.22 | -$7.80 | +1.12% |
| OSK | $111.54 | +0.50% | 7.2B | 11.92 | $9.36 | +1.74% |
| TEX | $46.91 | +1.98% | 3.1B | 12.78 | $3.67 | +1.45% |
| ALG | $216.80 | +2.04% | 2.6B | 22.58 | $9.60 | +0.51% |
Stock Comparison
CEADW vs CAT Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while CAT trades at $362.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs DE Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while DE trades at $524.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs PCAR Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while PCAR trades at $92.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs CNH Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while CNH trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs CNHI Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs AGCO Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while AGCO trades at $103.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs OSK Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while OSK trades at $111.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs TEX Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while TEX trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs ALG Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while ALG trades at $216.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs REVG Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while REVG trades at $44.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs LNN Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while LNN trades at $135.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs ASTE Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 934.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while ASTE trades at $40.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 61.91. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs HY Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while HY trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs TWI Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 580M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while TWI trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -39.59. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs WNC Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 449.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while WNC trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs CMCO Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while CMCO trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is -84.94. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs SHYF Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while SHYF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 600.00. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs MTW Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while MTW trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs GENC Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 211.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while GENC trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs MNTX Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs LEV Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs XOSWW Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs XOS Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while XOS trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs HYFM Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while HYFM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs NKLA Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs ZEV Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs ARTW Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while ARTW trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs CEAD Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs UGRO Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while UGRO trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs IDEX Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.
CEADW vs NAV Comparison
CEADW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEADW stands at 19.7K. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CEADW is priced at $0.03, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEADW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, CEADW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CEADW is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEADW.