Castillo Copper Limited
Castillo Copper Limited CCZ.AX Peers
See (CCZ.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZ.AX | A$0.01 | N/A | 16M | -1.10 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| OZL.AX | A$28.19 | N/A | 9.5B | 45.47 | A$0.62 | N/A |
| CSC.AX | A$8.30 | -1.54% | 6.3B | -36.09 | -A$0.23 | N/A |
| SFR.AX | A$11.62 | +2.29% | 5.3B | 40.07 | A$0.29 | N/A |
| WA1.AX | A$13.25 | -1.49% | 897.2M | -220.83 | -A$0.06 | N/A |
| C6C.AX | A$2.79 | +1.45% | 598.1M | -9.62 | -A$0.29 | N/A |
| GRX.AX | A$0.71 | +1.43% | 198.7M | -35.50 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| CVV.AX | A$0.19 | N/A | 103.4M | -18.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| HGO.AX | A$0.04 | -4.88% | 101.8M | -3.90 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| AR1.AX | A$0.16 | -3.03% | 84.3M | -2.29 | -A$0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCZ.AX vs OZL.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, OZL.AX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while OZL.AX trades at A$28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas OZL.AX's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OZL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to OZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs CSC.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, CSC.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CSC.AX trades at A$8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CSC.AX's P/E ratio is -36.09. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSC.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to CSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs SFR.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, SFR.AX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while SFR.AX trades at A$11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SFR.AX's P/E ratio is 40.07. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to SFR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs WA1.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, WA1.AX has a market cap of 897.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while WA1.AX trades at A$13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas WA1.AX's P/E ratio is -220.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WA1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to WA1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs C6C.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, C6C.AX has a market cap of 598.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while C6C.AX trades at A$2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas C6C.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to C6C.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to C6C.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs GRX.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, GRX.AX has a market cap of 198.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while GRX.AX trades at A$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas GRX.AX's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRX.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to GRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs CVV.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, CVV.AX has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CVV.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CVV.AX's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVV.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to CVV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs HGO.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, HGO.AX has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while HGO.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas HGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HGO.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to HGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs AR1.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, AR1.AX has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while AR1.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas AR1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AR1.AX's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to AR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs HCH.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, HCH.AX has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while HCH.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas HCH.AX's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HCH.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to HCH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs CYM.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, CYM.AX has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CYM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CYM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYM.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to CYM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs CSE.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, CSE.AX has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CSE.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CSE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to CSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs KCC.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, KCC.AX has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while KCC.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas KCC.AX's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KCC.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to KCC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs SLM.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, SLM.AX has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while SLM.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas SLM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLM.AX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to SLM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs NRX.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, NRX.AX has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while NRX.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NRX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NRX.AX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to NRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs RRR.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, RRR.AX has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while RRR.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas RRR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RRR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX and RRR.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCZ.AX vs ALM.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, ALM.AX has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while ALM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas ALM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALM.AX's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to ALM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs REC.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, REC.AX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while REC.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas REC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to REC.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX and REC.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCZ.AX vs RDS.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, RDS.AX has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while RDS.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas RDS.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RDS.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to RDS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs CPO.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, CPO.AX has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CPO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas CPO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPO.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to CPO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.
CCZ.AX vs NTM.AX Comparison
CCZ.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ.AX stands at 16M. In comparison, NTM.AX has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ.AX is priced at A$0.01, while NTM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -1.10, whereas NTM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CCZ.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NTM.AX's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ.AX is less volatile compared to NTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.AX.