Core Assets Corp.
Core Assets Corp. (CC.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CC.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC.CN | CA$0.56 | +12.00% | 7.6M | -6.00 | -CA$0.10 | N/A |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$45.57 | +1.24% | 21.6B | 101.24 | CA$0.45 | +2.22% |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$44.60 | +2.27% | 21.3B | 99.73 | CA$0.45 | +2.24% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.26 | +5.73% | 14.9B | 27.60 | CA$0.40 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$21.08 | +5.14% | 4.3B | -53.74 | -CA$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$21.31 | +7.49% | 2.4B | -13.19 | -CA$1.59 | N/A |
| VZLA.TO | CA$4.43 | +10.20% | 1.5B | -146.67 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$2.65 | +7.29% | 1.4B | -52.20 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CC.CN vs TECK-A.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 101.24. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs TECK-B.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 99.73. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs IVN.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check IVN.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs AKE.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AKE.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs FIL.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FIL.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs NGEX.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NGEX.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs SKE.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SKE.TO trades at CA$21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SKE.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs VZLA.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -146.67. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check VZLA.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs FOM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FOM.TO trades at CA$2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -52.20. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FOM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs ALS.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ALS.TO trades at CA$29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ALS.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs AII.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AII.TO trades at CA$5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -22.72. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AII.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs USA.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while USA.TO trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check USA.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LAC.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 792.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LAC.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs MDI.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 718.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while MDI.TO trades at CA$8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check MDI.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs FVL.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 698.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -132.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FVL.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LAAC.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LAAC.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs PMET.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 623.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while PMET.TO trades at CA$3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -96.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check PMET.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs NDM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 581.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NDM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs POM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check POM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs ETG.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ETG.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LUCA.V Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 434.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LUCA.V's competition here
CC.CN vs SAU.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 414.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to SAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SAU.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs PRYM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -18.85. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check PRYM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs SOLG.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SOLG.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LIRC.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LIRC.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs TMQ.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -26.87. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TMQ.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs ERD.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ERD.TO trades at CA$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ERD.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs WRN.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check WRN.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs ARA.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 314.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ARA.TO trades at CA$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ARA.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs ECOR.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ECOR.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs MNO.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check MNO.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs TLO.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 281.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TLO.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LIFT.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LIFT.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs TLG.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TLG.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs SMT.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SMT.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs GLO.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check GLO.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs VROY.V Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -21.31. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check VROY.V's competition here
CC.CN vs TI.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TI.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -10.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TI.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs GEO.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 177.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check GEO.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs MOLY.NE Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 166.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -46.33. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check MOLY.NE's competition here
CC.CN vs FAR.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FAR.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs IBAT.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to IBAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check IBAT.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LAM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs CDPR.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check CDPR.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs NB.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NB.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LGO.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LGO.TO trades at CA$1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LGO.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs FURY.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FURY.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs AMC.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AMC.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FSY.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs NEXT.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NEXT.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs AOT.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AOT.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs GENM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check GENM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs TSK.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -12.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TSK.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs SLR.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SLR.TO trades at CA$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SLR.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs GMX.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check GMX.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs WM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check WM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs PM.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check PM.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs S.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while S.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check S.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs NVLH.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to NVLH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NVLH.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs OGD.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check OGD.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs RUA.V Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check RUA.V's competition here
CC.CN vs TOC.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TOC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TOC.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs NCF.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to NCF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NCF.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs ARS.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ARS.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs RTG.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to RTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check RTG.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs MIN.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to MIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check MIN.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LFLR.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -4.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LFLR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LFLR.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs FT.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FT.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs RUA.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check RUA.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs VALU.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to VALU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check VALU.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs FOX.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to FOX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check FOX.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs BKI.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check BKI.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs EGFV.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to EGFV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check EGFV.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs AMPS.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to AMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AMPS.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs AAN.V Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to AAN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AAN.V's competition here
CC.CN vs VOY.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while VOY.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to VOY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check VOY.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs AVL.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check AVL.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs MAXX.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check MAXX.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs SX.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SX.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs URNM.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to URNM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check URNM.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs SAM.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN and SAM.TO have similar daily volatility (6.90).Check SAM.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs EXN.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check EXN.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs LVL.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LVL.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CC.CN has daily volatility of 6.90 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVL.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs SLV.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SLV.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs WRX.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to WRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check WRX.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs NICO.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NICO.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to NICO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NICO.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs SUPR.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SUPR.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs TICO.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TICO.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TICO.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs COSA.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check COSA.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs ASND.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to ASND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check ASND.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs SVB.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SVB.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs TTX.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TTX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TTX.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs SCY.TO Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check SCY.TO's competition here
CC.CN vs PNRG.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PNRG.CN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while PNRG.CN trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PNRG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PNRG.CN's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to PNRG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check PNRG.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs PEK.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is less volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check PEK.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs NXU.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to NXU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check NXU.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs TN.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check TN.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs LIM.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to LIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check LIM.CN's competition here
CC.CN vs GAMA.CN Comparison August 2025
CC.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC.CN stands at 7.6M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC.CN is priced at CA$0.56, while GAMA.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.00, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, CC.CN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CC.CN is more volatile compared to GAMA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.CN.Check GAMA.CN's competition here