Mersen S.A.
Mersen S.A. (CBLNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CBLNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBLNY | $4.61 | +0.00% | 561.2M | 8.70 | $0.53 | +5.29% |
| ABLZF | $66.25 | +0.01% | 123.4B | 29.64 | $2.28 | +1.51% |
| ABBNY | $67.04 | +0.13% | 123B | 29.38 | $2.28 | +1.48% |
| DLEGF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 52.8B | 80.00 | $0.05 | +0.34% |
| MIELF | $22.76 | +3.92% | 47.2B | 21.67 | $1.05 | +1.49% |
| MIELY | $44.74 | -1.54% | 46.4B | 21.20 | $2.11 | +1.05% |
| LGRVF | $149.84 | +2.74% | 39.3B | 28.43 | $5.27 | +1.53% |
| LGRDY | $29.39 | -0.41% | 38.5B | 27.97 | $1.05 | +1.64% |
| PRYMY | $38.67 | -0.77% | 22.2B | 27.61 | $1.40 | +1.17% |
| PRYMF | $76.59 | -3.05% | 22B | 27.35 | $2.80 | +1.19% |
Stock Comparison
CBLNY vs ABLZF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ABLZF trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ABLZF's competition here
CBLNY vs ABBNY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ABBNY trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ABBNY's competition here
CBLNY vs DLEGF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while DLEGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check DLEGF's competition here
CBLNY vs MIELF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while MIELF trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check MIELF's competition here
CBLNY vs MIELY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while MIELY trades at $44.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check MIELY's competition here
CBLNY vs LGRVF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LGRVF trades at $149.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and LGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGRVF's competition here
CBLNY vs LGRDY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LGRDY trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check LGRDY's competition here
CBLNY vs PRYMY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while PRYMY trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check PRYMY's competition here
CBLNY vs PRYMF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while PRYMF trades at $76.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check PRYMF's competition here
CBLNY vs OSAGY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and OSAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSAGY's competition here
CBLNY vs FELTY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while FELTY trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check FELTY's competition here
CBLNY vs FELTF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while FELTF trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and FELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FELTF's competition here
CBLNY vs PHPPY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while PHPPY trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and PHPPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHPPY's competition here
CBLNY vs NEXNY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while NEXNY trades at $70.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check NEXNY's competition here
CBLNY vs NXPRF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while NXPRF trades at $141.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and NXPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXPRF's competition here
CBLNY vs YASKF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while YASKF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and YASKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YASKF's competition here
CBLNY vs OSAGF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and OSAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSAGF's competition here
CBLNY vs NRKBF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while NRKBF trades at $81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check NRKBF's competition here
CBLNY vs FUWAF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while FUWAF trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and FUWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUWAF's competition here
CBLNY vs FUWAY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while FUWAY trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check FUWAY's competition here
CBLNY vs SFFYF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while SFFYF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and SFFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFFYF's competition here
CBLNY vs LMHDF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and LMHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LMHDF's competition here
CBLNY vs YASKY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while YASKY trades at $44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check YASKY's competition here
CBLNY vs LDGYY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LDGYY trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is -27.54. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and LDGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LDGYY's competition here
CBLNY vs LGYRF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and LGYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGYRF's competition here
CBLNY vs GYUAF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check GYUAF's competition here
CBLNY vs HMDPF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while HMDPF trades at $85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check HMDPF's competition here
CBLNY vs VLXGF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while VLXGF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check VLXGF's competition here
CBLNY vs VARGF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and VARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VARGF's competition here
CBLNY vs HOIEF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and HOIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOIEF's competition here
CBLNY vs EFLVF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check EFLVF's competition here
CBLNY vs CBLNF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check CBLNF's competition here
CBLNY vs WSPCF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check WSPCF's competition here
CBLNY vs RNRTY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and RNRTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNRTY's competition here
CBLNY vs ZMTBY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ZMTBY's competition here
CBLNY vs XPPLF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while XPPLF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check XPPLF's competition here
CBLNY vs ALFNF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ALFNF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ALFNF's competition here
CBLNY vs COSXF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while COSXF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 43.81. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check COSXF's competition here
CBLNY vs ABHBY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ABHBY's competition here
CBLNY vs CRPHY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while CRPHY trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check CRPHY's competition here
CBLNY vs CPWHF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 246.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while CPWHF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and CPWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWHF's competition here
CBLNY vs NVNXF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while NVNXF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check NVNXF's competition here
CBLNY vs PCELF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while PCELF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and PCELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCELF's competition here
CBLNY vs FCELB Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while FCELB trades at $327.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1062.82. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check FCELB's competition here
CBLNY vs GELNF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and GELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GELNF's competition here
CBLNY vs AFGYF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while AFGYF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and AFGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFGYF's competition here
CBLNY vs TNPOF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check TNPOF's competition here
CBLNY vs ILIKF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ILIKF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ILIKF's competition here
CBLNY vs DIALF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while DIALF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check DIALF's competition here
CBLNY vs VARTY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check VARTY's competition here
CBLNY vs MNSEF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check MNSEF's competition here
CBLNY vs ONMBF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and ONMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONMBF's competition here
CBLNY vs TNTLF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check TNTLF's competition here
CBLNY vs ARTGF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ARTGF's competition here
CBLNY vs EXROF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while EXROF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check EXROF's competition here
CBLNY vs NHHHF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while NHHHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check NHHHF's competition here
CBLNY vs IHGP Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while IHGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check IHGP's competition here
CBLNY vs QBAK Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while QBAK trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check QBAK's competition here
CBLNY vs ORBT Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ORBT trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ORBT's competition here
CBLNY vs LPSIF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LPSIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check LPSIF's competition here
CBLNY vs DFEL Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while DFEL trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and DFEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFEL's competition here
CBLNY vs SSCFF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and SSCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSCFF's competition here
CBLNY vs ASTO Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ASTO trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and ASTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASTO's competition here
CBLNY vs HYEG Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while HYEG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and HYEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYEG's competition here
CBLNY vs LNNNF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and LNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNNNF's competition here
CBLNY vs GPGC Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and GPGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPGC's competition here
CBLNY vs CECBF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and CECBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CECBF's competition here
CBLNY vs LPENF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check LPENF's competition here
CBLNY vs EGTYF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check EGTYF's competition here
CBLNY vs IDGC Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and IDGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDGC's competition here
CBLNY vs OZSC Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check OZSC's competition here
CBLNY vs GBLTF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and GBLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBLTF's competition here
CBLNY vs CAPC Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while CAPC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check CAPC's competition here
CBLNY vs ENEVF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ENEVF's competition here
CBLNY vs KRFG Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and KRFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRFG's competition here
CBLNY vs ZAIRF Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check ZAIRF's competition here
CBLNY vs USLG Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while USLG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check USLG's competition here
CBLNY vs TOGI Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check TOGI's competition here
CBLNY vs LNNNY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check LNNNY's competition here
CBLNY vs BSTK Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 580.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check BSTK's competition here
CBLNY vs SGLN Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and SGLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLN's competition here
CBLNY vs PSTO Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while PSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and PSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSTO's competition here
CBLNY vs HLXW Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 265.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check HLXW's competition here
CBLNY vs IMHCW Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check IMHCW's competition here
CBLNY vs AIPG Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while AIPG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and AIPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIPG's competition here
CBLNY vs EIPC Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and EIPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIPC's competition here
CBLNY vs DLYT Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and DLYT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLYT's competition here
CBLNY vs CHGI Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and CHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHGI's competition here
CBLNY vs FDEI Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and FDEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDEI's competition here
CBLNY vs DCFCQ Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while DCFCQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check DCFCQ's competition here
CBLNY vs LSCG Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check LSCG's competition here
CBLNY vs GNAL Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and GNAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNAL's competition here
CBLNY vs GCHT Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and GCHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCHT's competition here
CBLNY vs USGA Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check USGA's competition here
CBLNY vs GCLL Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and GCLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCLL's competition here
CBLNY vs XNNHQ Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and XNNHQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XNNHQ's competition here
CBLNY vs TMGY Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and TMGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMGY's competition here
CBLNY vs TRUL Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while TRUL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY is less volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBLNY.Check TRUL's competition here
CBLNY vs AXPWQ Comparison July 2025
CBLNY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBLNY stands at 561.2M. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, CBLNY is priced at $4.61, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBLNY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBLNY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CBLNY and AXPWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXPWQ's competition here