1606 Corp.
1606 Corp. (CBDW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CBDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBDW | $0.00 | -52.17% | 153.6K | -0.02 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| BTAFF | $56.68 | -0.67% | 123.8B | 30.15 | $1.88 | +5.47% |
| JAPAY | $16.00 | -2.77% | 56.8B | 43.22 | $0.37 | N/A |
| JAPAF | $30.90 | +0.00% | 54.9B | 41.76 | $0.74 | +4.31% |
| IMBBY | $42.00 | -0.26% | 35.5B | 10.43 | $4.03 | +5.73% |
| IMBBF | $41.05 | -5.49% | 34.5B | 10.19 | $4.03 | +5.65% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 41.67 | $0.03 | +1.07% |
| PHJMF | $0.03 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 3.00 | $0.01 | +11.43% |
| PHPMF | $869.36 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 15.01 | $57.90 | +6.45% |
Stock Comparison
CBDW vs BTAFF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while BTAFF trades at $56.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check BTAFF's competition here
CBDW vs JAPAY Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while JAPAY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 43.22. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check JAPAY's competition here
CBDW vs JAPAF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while JAPAF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to JAPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check JAPAF's competition here
CBDW vs IMBBY Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IMBBY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while IMBBY trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMBBY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IMBBY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to IMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check IMBBY's competition here
CBDW vs IMBBF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while IMBBF trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check IMBBF's competition here
CBDW vs SWMAY Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to SWMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check SWMAY's competition here
CBDW vs SMORF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while SMORF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check SMORF's competition here
CBDW vs PHJMF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while PHJMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to PHJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check PHJMF's competition here
CBDW vs PHPMF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while PHPMF trades at $869.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check PHPMF's competition here
CBDW vs STBGY Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while STBGY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check STBGY's competition here
CBDW vs GGNPF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while GGNPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check GGNPF's competition here
CBDW vs SNDVF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while SNDVF trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check SNDVF's competition here
CBDW vs GDNGY Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while GDNGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 107.50. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to GDNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check GDNGY's competition here
CBDW vs KCIGF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to KCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check KCIGF's competition here
CBDW vs PYYX Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while PYYX trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PYYX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to PYYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check PYYX's competition here
CBDW vs CHUC Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while CHUC trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check CHUC's competition here
CBDW vs GRAM Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while GRAM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check GRAM's competition here
CBDW vs GGII Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is less volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check GGII's competition here
CBDW vs VAPR Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check VAPR's competition here
CBDW vs VPRB Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while VPRB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to VPRB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check VPRB's competition here
CBDW vs LBRG Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LBRG's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to LBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check LBRG's competition here
CBDW vs TOBAF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while TOBAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of +6.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to TOBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check TOBAF's competition here
CBDW vs WSRRF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while WSRRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to WSRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check WSRRF's competition here
CBDW vs HUMBF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to HUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check HUMBF's competition here
CBDW vs VPOR Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 273K. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is less volatile compared to VPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check VPOR's competition here
CBDW vs IDLSF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to IDLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check IDLSF's competition here
CBDW vs MEDH Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while MEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MEDH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check MEDH's competition here
CBDW vs ASHI Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while ASHI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is less volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check ASHI's competition here
CBDW vs SWMAF Comparison August 2025
CBDW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBDW stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBDW is priced at $0.00, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBDW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBDW's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBDW is more volatile compared to SWMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBDW.Check SWMAF's competition here