Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBAUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CBAUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBAUF | $113.28 | -3.14% | 189.4B | 29.73 | $3.81 | +2.70% |
| BACRP | $225.00 | +17.18% | 424.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.14% |
| IDCBY | $15.50 | -0.39% | 352.4B | 5.73 | $2.70 | +4.24% |
| IDCBF | $0.78 | -2.14% | 349.3B | 5.54 | $0.14 | +5.53% |
| ACGBF | $0.71 | +7.18% | 301.3B | 6.89 | $0.10 | +4.90% |
| ACGBY | $16.68 | -1.18% | 293.3B | 6.39 | $2.61 | +3.82% |
| CICHY | $21.15 | -1.08% | 253.8B | 5.88 | $3.59 | +4.09% |
| BACHY | $14.86 | -1.00% | 234.2B | 5.68 | $2.61 | +4.28% |
| CICHF | $0.95 | -3.06% | 228.4B | 5.28 | $0.18 | +5.89% |
| HBCYF | $12.62 | -2.92% | 219.8B | 11.57 | $1.09 | +7.99% |
Stock Comparison
CBAUF vs BACRP Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 424.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BACRP trades at $225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BACRP's competition here
CBAUF vs IDCBY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 352.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while IDCBY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check IDCBY's competition here
CBAUF vs IDCBF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 349.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while IDCBF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check IDCBF's competition here
CBAUF vs ACGBF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 301.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ACGBF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ACGBF's competition here
CBAUF vs ACGBY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 293.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ACGBY trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ACGBY's competition here
CBAUF vs CICHY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 253.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while CICHY trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check CICHY's competition here
CBAUF vs BACHY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 234.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BACHY trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BACHY's competition here
CBAUF vs CICHF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 228.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while CICHF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and CICHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CICHF's competition here
CBAUF vs HBCYF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while HBCYF trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check HBCYF's competition here
CBAUF vs BACHF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BACHF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACHF's competition here
CBAUF vs CMWAY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 190.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while CMWAY trades at $113.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check CMWAY's competition here
CBAUF vs MBFJF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while MBFJF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check MBFJF's competition here
CBAUF vs BCDRF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BCDRF trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCDRF's competition here
CBAUF vs SMFNF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while SMFNF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and SMFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMFNF's competition here
CBAUF vs BKFCF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BKFCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
CBAUF vs BBVXF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BBVXF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BBVXF's competition here
CBAUF vs NABZY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while NABZY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NABZY's competition here
CBAUF vs NAUBF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while NAUBF trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and NAUBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAUBF's competition here
CBAUF vs WEBNF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while WEBNF trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check WEBNF's competition here
CBAUF vs BCLYF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BCLYF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCLYF's competition here
CBAUF vs INGVF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while INGVF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGVF's competition here
CBAUF vs ANZGY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ANZGY trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ANZGY's competition here
CBAUF vs RBSPF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while RBSPF trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check RBSPF's competition here
CBAUF vs ANEWF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
CBAUF vs BCMXY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BCMXY trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BCMXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCMXY's competition here
CBAUF vs SCBFY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while SCBFY trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SCBFY's competition here
CBAUF vs SCBFF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while SCBFF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SCBFF's competition here
CBAUF vs NBKCF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NBKCF's competition here
CBAUF vs NTIOF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while NTIOF trades at $105.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NTIOF's competition here
CBAUF vs TDBKF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check TDBKF's competition here
CBAUF vs WFCNP Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while WFCNP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and WFCNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFCNP's competition here
CBAUF vs ABMRF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ABMRF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
CBAUF vs AAVMY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while AAVMY trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check AAVMY's competition here
CBAUF vs SVNLF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while SVNLF trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SVNLF's competition here
CBAUF vs RBCPF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check RBCPF's competition here
CBAUF vs SVNLY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while SVNLY trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SVNLY's competition here
CBAUF vs FANDF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while FANDF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
CBAUF vs BNSPF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
CBAUF vs BNDSF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BNDSF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BNDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSF's competition here
CBAUF vs BNDSY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BNDSY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BNDSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSY's competition here
CBAUF vs ALORY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ALORY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ALORY's competition here
CBAUF vs EFGXY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check EFGXY's competition here
CBAUF vs EFGIF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while EFGIF trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check EFGIF's competition here
CBAUF vs CSGKF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
CBAUF vs FANDY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while FANDY trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and FANDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDY's competition here
CBAUF vs PRRCF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
CBAUF vs VUPPF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
CBAUF vs BCSO Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCSO's competition here
CBAUF vs ANZBY Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here
CBAUF vs TNTTF Comparison July 2025
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 189.4B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $113.28, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check TNTTF's competition here