Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Commonwealth Bank of Australia CBAUF Peers
See (CBAUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBAUF | $102.67 | N/A | 171.66B | 27.16 | $3.78 | +2.98% |
| BACRP | $193.00 | N/A | 333.52B | N/A | N/A | +3.63% |
| IDCBY | $14.25 | -0.77% | 330.59B | 5.32 | $2.68 | +8.09% |
| IDCBF | $0.68 | +0.89% | 314.80B | 5.23 | $0.13 | +9.26% |
| ACGBY | $16.10 | +0.55% | 271.26B | 6.24 | $2.58 | +6.90% |
| ACGBF | $0.60 | -11.76% | 251.72B | 6.00 | $0.10 | +8.10% |
| WFCNP | $1.25 | +2400.20% | 248.23B | 0.31 | $4.03 | +2.10% |
| CICHY | $17.64 | -0.20% | 224.62B | 4.90 | $3.60 | +11.14% |
| BACHY | $14.86 | -0.03% | 216.55B | 5.78 | $2.57 | +9.76% |
| BACHF | $0.60 | -0.47% | 214.97B | 5.97 | $0.10 | +11.18% |
Stock Comparison
CBAUF vs BACRP Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 333.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BACRP trades at $193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs IDCBY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 330.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while IDCBY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs IDCBF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 314.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while IDCBF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs ACGBY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 271.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while ACGBY trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs ACGBF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 251.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while ACGBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs WFCNP Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 248.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while WFCNP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs CICHY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 224.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while CICHY trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BACHY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 216.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BACHY trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BACHF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 214.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BACHF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs HBCYF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 207.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while HBCYF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs CICHF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 206.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while CICHF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs CMWAY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 182.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while CMWAY trades at $109.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs MBFJF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 157.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while MBFJF trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BCDRF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 118.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BCDRF trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BCDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs SMFNF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 95.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while SMFNF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BBVXF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 86.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BBVXF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs NAUBF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 77.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while NAUBF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs NABZY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 74.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while NABZY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BCMXY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 74.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BCMXY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs WEBNF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 73.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while WEBNF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and WEBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs BKFCF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs INGVF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 61.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while INGVF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BCLYF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 61.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BCLYF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs ANZGY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 56.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while ANZGY trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs RBSPF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 53.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while RBSPF trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs ANEWF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs SCBFY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 36.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while SCBFY trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs NTIOF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 35.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while NTIOF trades at $91.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and NTIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs NBKCF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 35.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs SCBFF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 34.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while SCBFF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs TDBKF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while TDBKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and TDBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs SVNLY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 26.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while SVNLY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs SVNLF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 25.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while SVNLF trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs RBCPF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs FANDF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while FANDF trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs BNSPF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs ABMRF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 20.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while ABMRF trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs AAVMY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 19.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while AAVMY trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BNDSF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BNDSF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs BNDSY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 16.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BNDSY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BNDSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs EFGXY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs EFGIF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs ALORY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while ALORY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs CSGKF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs FANDY Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while FANDY trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.
CBAUF vs VUPPF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 612.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs PRRCF Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while PRRCF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CBAUF vs BCSO Comparison
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 171.66B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 74.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $102.67, while BCSO trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.16, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.