Caterpillar Inc.
Caterpillar Inc. CAT Peers
See (CAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CAT vs DE Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 130.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while DE trades at $481.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs DTRUY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 63.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while DTRUY trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs VOLVF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 55.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while VOLVF trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs VLVLY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 54.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while VLVLY trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs VOLAF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 52.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while VOLAF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs PCAR Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 46.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while PCAR trades at $89.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs DTGHF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 31.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while DTGHF trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KMTUF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 28.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KMTUF trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to KMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KMTUY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 27.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KMTUY trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs EPIAF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 26.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while EPIAF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs EPOKY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while EPOKY trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KIGRY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 22.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KIGRY trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs EPIPF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 20.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs OUKPY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while OUKPY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs TRATF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while TRATF trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CNH Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CNH trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CNHI Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KUBTF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KUBTF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ZLIOF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ZLIOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs OUKPF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ZLIOY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ZLIOY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs SHKLY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while SHKLY trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs AGCO Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while AGCO trades at $96.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs SHKLF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs HTCMY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while HTCMY trades at $59.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs OSK Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while OSK trades at $89.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs HTCMF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KNCRY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KNCRY trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KNNGF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KNNGF trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KNCRF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KNCRF trades at $57.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs KUBTY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while KUBTY trades at $58.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs TEX Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while TEX trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs SNYYF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while SNYYF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ALG Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ALG trades at $174.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs REVG Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while REVG trades at $35.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs WKRCF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while WKRCF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs FIRRF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs LNN Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while LNN trades at $132.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs PLFRF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while PLFRF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs LKHLY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs PLFRY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs LONKF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while LONKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ASTE Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 872.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ASTE trades at $38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 200.74. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs HY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 703.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while HY trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs FIRRY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs AGGZF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 445.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while AGGZF trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CMCO Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 439.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CMCO trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs TWI Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 438.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while TWI trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -86.12. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs WNC Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 338.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while WNC trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs SHYF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 315.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while SHYF trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs MTW Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 299.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while MTW trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs AUSTF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs GENC Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 188.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while GENC trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs QGLHF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 175.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs TGHLF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 139.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while TGHLF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs MNTX Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs PLPKF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs LEV Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs BIIAF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs FBRKF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 33.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while FBRKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs XOS Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 30.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while XOS trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to XOS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs XOSWW Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 28.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs HYFM Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 17.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while HYFM trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CLEV Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 16.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CLEV trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs NKLA Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ZEV Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +86.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ARTW Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ARTW trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CUBXF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CUBXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CEAD Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 5.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CEAD trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs UGRO Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 5.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while UGRO trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs GWPD Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while GWPD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs AMMX Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while AMMX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs AIFM Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 692997.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while AIFM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs WWTIF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 538082.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs GRSO Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460599.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CYLC Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 386470.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs IDEX Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42143.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs ZEVY Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 32968.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while ZEVY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CLGPF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11772.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CLGPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs CEADW Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 10058.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while CEADW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs OSRS Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OSRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs BWOWF Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs GRNH Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs GRAZ Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, GRAZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
CAT vs NAV Comparison
CAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT stands at 154.48B. In comparison, NAV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CAT is priced at $323.22, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, CAT's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT | $323.22 | -0.14% | 154.48B | 14.65 | $22.06 | +1.74% |
DE | $481.22 | -0.09% | 130.61B | 21.31 | $22.58 | +1.28% |
DTRUY | $20.26 | +0.70% | 63.36B | 9.84 | $2.06 | +5.43% |
VOLVF | $27.25 | N/A | 55.42B | 11.60 | $2.35 | +6.92% |
VLVLY | $27.37 | -1.20% | 54.93B | 11.65 | $2.35 | +6.14% |
VOLAF | $26.00 | N/A | 52.84B | 11.06 | $2.35 | +7.26% |
PCAR | $89.45 | -0.50% | 46.96B | 13.57 | $6.59 | +4.38% |
DTGHF | $40.98 | +4.02% | 31.49B | 9.95 | $4.12 | +4.64% |
KMTUF | $30.36 | +2.75% | 28.02B | 9.17 | $3.31 | +4.24% |
KMTUY | $29.73 | +0.51% | 27.44B | 8.98 | $3.31 | N/A |