Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAS | $26.78 | +0.84% | 10.7M | N/A | N/A | +46.38% |
| GEGGL | $24.73 | +0.24% | 299.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.33% |
| FUSVX | $95.27 | -0.63% | 157B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBKR | $71.30 | -3.64% | 128.5B | 33.82 | $2.20 | +0.41% |
| BNJ | $15.46 | +0.01% | 106.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.52% |
| ICSFX | $32.50 | +0.18% | 13.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MGR | $21.32 | -0.84% | 6.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.86% |
| ABXL | $25.90 | -0.54% | 2.5B | 325.22 | N/A | +9.48% |
| SFB | $20.68 | -0.43% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.27% |
| BDVL | $25.67 | +0.49% | 1.5B | 21.01 | $1.22 | +2.69% |
Stock Comparison
CAS vs GEGGL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 299.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while GEGGL trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check GEGGL's competition here
CAS vs FUSVX Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FUSVX has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while FUSVX trades at $95.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUSVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CAS has daily volatility of 1.62 and FUSVX has daily volatility of N/A.Check FUSVX's competition here
CAS vs IBKR Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while IBKR trades at $71.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check IBKR's competition here
CAS vs BNJ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while BNJ trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check BNJ's competition here
CAS vs ICSFX Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ICSFX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while ICSFX trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICSFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICSFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to ICSFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check ICSFX's competition here
CAS vs MGR Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while MGR trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check MGR's competition here
CAS vs ABXL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ABXL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while ABXL trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXL's P/E ratio is 325.22. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABXL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to ABXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check ABXL's competition here
CAS vs SFB Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SFB trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SFB's competition here
CAS vs BDVL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BDVL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while BDVL trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVL's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to BDVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check BDVL's competition here
CAS vs XPMSX Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, XPMSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while XPMSX trades at $59.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XPMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to XPMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check XPMSX's competition here
CAS vs TRINL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check TRINL's competition here
CAS vs CGBDL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while CGBDL trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check CGBDL's competition here
CAS vs FCRX Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 933.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while FCRX trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 177.39. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check FCRX's competition here
CAS vs BULLW Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 718.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while BULLW trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check BULLW's competition here
CAS vs RPC Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, RPC has a market cap of 664.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while RPC trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPC's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to RPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check RPC's competition here
CAS vs WHFCL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 591.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while WHFCL trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check WHFCL's competition here
CAS vs GLADZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while GLADZ trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check GLADZ's competition here
CAS vs MGRB Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while MGRB trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check MGRB's competition here
CAS vs MGRD Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while MGRD trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check MGRD's competition here
CAS vs SAJ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SAJ trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SAJ's competition here
CAS vs SAZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SAZ trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SAZ's competition here
CAS vs SAY Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SAY trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SAY's competition here
CAS vs PMPEX Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, PMPEX has a market cap of 368.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while PMPEX trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMPEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to PMPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check PMPEX's competition here
CAS vs KCHVU Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, KCHVU has a market cap of 361.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while KCHVU trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCHVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KCHVU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to KCHVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check KCHVU's competition here
CAS vs KCHV Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, KCHV has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while KCHV trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCHV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KCHV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to KCHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check KCHV's competition here
CAS vs RILYZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while RILYZ trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check RILYZ's competition here
CAS vs OPPE Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, OPPE has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while OPPE trades at $55.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPPE's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to OPPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check OPPE's competition here
CAS vs FFUT Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FFUT has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while FFUT trades at $55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFUT's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to FFUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check FFUT's competition here
CAS vs GECCZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while GECCZ trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check GECCZ's competition here
CAS vs GPZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GPZ has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while GPZ trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPZ's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to GPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check GPZ's competition here
CAS vs PLTZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, PLTZ has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while PLTZ trades at $40.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to PLTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check PLTZ's competition here
CAS vs SYZ Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SYZ has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SYZ trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYZ's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SYZ's competition here
CAS vs BRKC Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BRKC has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while BRKC trades at $43.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRKC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to BRKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check BRKC's competition here
CAS vs CPSR Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CPSR has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while CPSR trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to CPSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check CPSR's competition here
CAS vs STSB Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while STSB trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check STSB's competition here
CAS vs CPSU Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CPSU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while CPSU trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPSU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to CPSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check CPSU's competition here
CAS vs FTBI Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FTBI has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while FTBI trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBI's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTBI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to FTBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check FTBI's competition here
CAS vs INVG Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, INVG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while INVG trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to INVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check INVG's competition here
CAS vs EPEM Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, EPEM has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while EPEM trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPEM's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPEM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to EPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check EPEM's competition here
CAS vs EPIN Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, EPIN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while EPIN trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPIN's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to EPIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check EPIN's competition here
CAS vs SPCT Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SPCT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SPCT trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPCT's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SPCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SPCT's competition here
CAS vs ZBAI Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while ZBAI trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check ZBAI's competition here
CAS vs TAVIR Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TAVIR has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while TAVIR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAVIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to TAVIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check TAVIR's competition here
CAS vs BFJL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BFJL has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while BFJL trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFJL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFJL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to BFJL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check BFJL's competition here
CAS vs BTMWW Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while BTMWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check BTMWW's competition here
CAS vs ABXB Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ABXB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while ABXB trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABXB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to ABXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check ABXB's competition here
CAS vs WILD Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, WILD has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while WILD trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WILD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to WILD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check WILD's competition here
CAS vs RTXG Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, RTXG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while RTXG trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTXG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTXG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to RTXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check RTXG's competition here
CAS vs HBTA Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while HBTA trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check HBTA's competition here
CAS vs TERG Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TERG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while TERG trades at $45.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TERG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to TERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check TERG's competition here
CAS vs SOFL Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SOFL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SOFL trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SOFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SOFL's competition here
CAS vs THRV Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, THRV has a market cap of 625.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while THRV trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRV's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THRV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to THRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check THRV's competition here
CAS vs AURE Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, AURE has a market cap of 553.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while AURE trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AURE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to AURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check AURE's competition here
CAS vs ESLG Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ESLG has a market cap of 491.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while ESLG trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESLG's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to ESLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check ESLG's competition here
CAS vs SMYY Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SMYY has a market cap of 321.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SMYY trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SMYY's competition here
CAS vs OKTG Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, OKTG has a market cap of 289.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while OKTG trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OKTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to OKTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check OKTG's competition here
CAS vs SNDS Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SNDS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while SNDS trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to SNDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check SNDS's competition here
CAS vs NSAM Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NSAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while NSAM trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSAM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to NSAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check NSAM's competition here
CAS vs GJH Comparison February 2026
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $26.78, while GJH trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.Check GJH's competition here