Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF CAS Peers
See (CAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAS | $29.37 | -0.48% | 10.22M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BNJ | $15.08 | -1.50% | 96.34B | N/A | N/A | +0.55% |
| SFB | $20.34 | -0.67% | 10.04B | N/A | N/A | +1.73% |
| MGR | $20.53 | -0.58% | 5.20B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.20 | -1.04% | 5.17B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRB | $16.92 | -0.65% | 5.13B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| CGBDL | $25.83 | -0.08% | 1.02B | N/A | N/A | +5.95% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1.01B | N/A | N/A | +13.82% |
| FCRX | $24.80 | +0.20% | 919.13M | 174.65 | $0.14 | +5.05% |
| BULLW | $2.86 | -8.49% | 856.91M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAS vs BNJ Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 96.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while BNJ trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs SFB Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 10.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while SFB trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs MGR Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while MGR trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs MGRD Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while MGRD trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs MGRB Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while MGRB trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs CGBDL Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while CGBDL trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs TRINL Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs FCRX Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 919.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while FCRX trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 174.65. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs BULLW Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 856.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while BULLW trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BULLW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs GLADZ Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 577.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while GLADZ trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs SAZ Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 393.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while SAZ trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs SAY Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 392.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while SAY trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs SAJ Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 389.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while SAJ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs WHFCL Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 217.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while WHFCL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs GECCZ Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 123.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while GECCZ trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs BTMWW Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 113.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while BTMWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BTMWW's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs RILYZ Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 99.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while RILYZ trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs GEGGL Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 53.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while GEGGL trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs ZBAI Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 17.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while ZBAI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs STSB Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.
CAS vs HBTA Comparison
CAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAS stands at 10.22M. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 937262.00. Regarding current trading prices, CAS is priced at $29.37, while HBTA trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, CAS's ROE is N/A, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAS is more volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAS.