Candour Techtex Ltd.
Candour Techtex Ltd. (CANDOUR.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CANDOUR.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Textiles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANDOUR.BO | ₹152.75 | +0.13% | 2.9B | -90.76 | -₹1.70 | N/A |
| RNBDENIMS.BO | ₹190.40 | -1.45% | 17.7B | 68.10 | ₹2.89 | N/A |
| NIBE.BO | ₹1,089.60 | +2.40% | 14.8B | -213.01 | -₹4.79 | +0.12% |
| MAFATIND.BO | ₹133.75 | +1.13% | 9.5B | 10.07 | ₹13.04 | +1.71% |
| VTMLTD.BO | ₹90.65 | +7.04% | 8.6B | 38.37 | ₹2.24 | +0.99% |
| RAJPALAYAM.BO | ₹807.35 | -0.32% | 7.5B | 9.31 | ₹87.07 | +0.06% |
| VOITHPAPR.BO | ₹1,549.50 | -0.30% | 6.8B | 15.54 | ₹99.31 | +0.65% |
| GLOSTERLTD.BO | ₹594.35 | +3.12% | 6.4B | 84.17 | ₹6.92 | +3.44% |
| GLOSTERLTD.NS | ₹594.35 | +3.20% | 6.4B | 83.47 | ₹6.97 | +3.44% |
| SHRJAGP.BO | ₹608.75 | +0.63% | 5.2B | 10.60 | ₹56.50 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
CANDOUR.BO vs RNBDENIMS.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RNBDENIMS.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while RNBDENIMS.BO trades at ₹190.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas RNBDENIMS.BO's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RNBDENIMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to RNBDENIMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check RNBDENIMS.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs NIBE.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NIBE.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while NIBE.BO trades at ₹1,089.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas NIBE.BO's P/E ratio is -213.01. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NIBE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to NIBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check NIBE.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs MAFATIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MAFATIND.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while MAFATIND.BO trades at ₹133.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas MAFATIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MAFATIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to MAFATIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check MAFATIND.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs VTMLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VTMLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while VTMLTD.BO trades at ₹90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas VTMLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VTMLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to VTMLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check VTMLTD.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs RAJPALAYAM.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAJPALAYAM.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while RAJPALAYAM.BO trades at ₹807.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas RAJPALAYAM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check RAJPALAYAM.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs VOITHPAPR.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VOITHPAPR.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while VOITHPAPR.BO trades at ₹1,549.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas VOITHPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VOITHPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to VOITHPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check VOITHPAPR.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GLOSTERLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GLOSTERLTD.BO trades at ₹594.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GLOSTERLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 84.17. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GLOSTERLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GLOSTERLTD.NS trades at ₹594.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GLOSTERLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 83.47. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.NS's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SHRJAGP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHRJAGP.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SHRJAGP.BO trades at ₹608.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SHRJAGP.BO's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHRJAGP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SHRJAGP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SHRJAGP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs LAKSHMIMIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAKSHMIMIL.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while LAKSHMIMIL.BO trades at ₹7,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas LAKSHMIMIL.BO's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check LAKSHMIMIL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs AKSPINTEX.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AKSPINTEX.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while AKSPINTEX.BO trades at ₹943.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas AKSPINTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AKSPINTEX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to AKSPINTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check AKSPINTEX.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs RAGHUSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAGHUSYN.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while RAGHUSYN.BO trades at ₹103.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas RAGHUSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RAGHUSYN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to RAGHUSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check RAGHUSYN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs MANOMAY.NS Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MANOMAY.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while MANOMAY.NS trades at ₹223.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas MANOMAY.NS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MANOMAY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to MANOMAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check MANOMAY.NS's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs HIMFIBP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HIMFIBP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while HIMFIBP.BO trades at ₹43.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas HIMFIBP.BO's P/E ratio is -118.30. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HIMFIBP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to HIMFIBP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check HIMFIBP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs CNOVAPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while CNOVAPETRO.BO trades at ₹112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas CNOVAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -211.51. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SUDTIND-B.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUDTIND-B.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SUDTIND-B.BO trades at ₹71.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SUDTIND-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SUDTIND-B.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SUDTIND-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SUDTIND-B.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ARL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ARL.BO trades at ₹153.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ARL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to ARL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ARL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs BARODARY.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BARODARY.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while BARODARY.BO trades at ₹111.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas BARODARY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BARODARY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to BARODARY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check BARODARY.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs OSIAJEE.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OSIAJEE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while OSIAJEE.BO trades at ₹426.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas OSIAJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OSIAJEE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to OSIAJEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check OSIAJEE.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs LUDLOWJUT.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LUDLOWJUT.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while LUDLOWJUT.BO trades at ₹206.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas LUDLOWJUT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check LUDLOWJUT.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SHAHLON.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHAHLON.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SHAHLON.BO trades at ₹24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SHAHLON.BO's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHAHLON.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SHAHLON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SHAHLON.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs BTTL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BTTL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while BTTL.BO trades at ₹36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas BTTL.BO's P/E ratio is -46.29. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BTTL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to BTTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check BTTL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs RRIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RRIL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while RRIL.BO trades at ₹17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas RRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RRIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to RRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check RRIL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs RACE.NS Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RACE.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while RACE.NS trades at ₹124.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas RACE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.97. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RACE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to RACE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check RACE.NS's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs MKEXIM.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MKEXIM.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while MKEXIM.BO trades at ₹48.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas MKEXIM.BO's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MKEXIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to MKEXIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check MKEXIM.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SUPER.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUPER.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SUPER.BO trades at ₹609.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SUPER.BO's P/E ratio is 58.55. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SUPER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SUPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SUPER.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs JATTAINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JATTAINDUS.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while JATTAINDUS.BO trades at ₹418.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas JATTAINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 1250.00. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JATTAINDUS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to JATTAINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check JATTAINDUS.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs FILATFASH.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FILATFASH.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while FILATFASH.BO trades at ₹0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas FILATFASH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FILATFASH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to FILATFASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check FILATFASH.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SURYALA.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SURYALA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SURYALA.BO trades at ₹366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SURYALA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SURYALA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SURYALA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SURYALA.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs WINSOMTX.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WINSOMTX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while WINSOMTX.BO trades at ₹76.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas WINSOMTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WINSOMTX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to WINSOMTX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check WINSOMTX.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs LAHOTIOV.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAHOTIOV.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while LAHOTIOV.BO trades at ₹49.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas LAHOTIOV.BO's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LAHOTIOV.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to LAHOTIOV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check LAHOTIOV.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ZBINTXPP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZBINTXPP.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ZBINTXPP.BO trades at ₹1,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ZBINTXPP.BO's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZBINTXPP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to ZBINTXPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ZBINTXPP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs PREMCO.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PREMCO.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while PREMCO.BO trades at ₹424.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas PREMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PREMCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to PREMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check PREMCO.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SWADPOL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SWADPOL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SWADPOL.BO trades at ₹37.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SWADPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.47. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SWADPOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SWADPOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SWADPOL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs TTFL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TTFL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while TTFL.BO trades at ₹101.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas TTFL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.52. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TTFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to TTFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check TTFL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SHRIDINE.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHRIDINE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SHRIDINE.BO trades at ₹231.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SHRIDINE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHRIDINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIDINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SHRIDINE.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs BHUDEVI.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHUDEVI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while BHUDEVI.BO trades at ₹272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas BHUDEVI.BO's P/E ratio is -777.14. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BHUDEVI.BO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to BHUDEVI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check BHUDEVI.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GARNETINT.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GARNETINT.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GARNETINT.BO trades at ₹60.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GARNETINT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GARNETINT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to GARNETINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GARNETINT.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs KGPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KGPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while KGPETRO.BO trades at ₹221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas KGPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KGPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to KGPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check KGPETRO.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs HINDAPL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HINDAPL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while HINDAPL.BO trades at ₹102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas HINDAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 1000.00. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HINDAPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to HINDAPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check HINDAPL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ADDIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADDIND.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ADDIND.BO trades at ₹103.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ADDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to ADDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ADDIND.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs JCTLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JCTLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while JCTLTD.BO trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas JCTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JCTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to JCTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check JCTLTD.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SURATRAML.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SURATRAML.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SURATRAML.BO trades at ₹4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SURATRAML.BO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SURATRAML.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SURATRAML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SURATRAML.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ALSTONE.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALSTONE.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ALSTONE.BO trades at ₹0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ALSTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ALSTONE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to ALSTONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ALSTONE.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs BHILSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHILSPIN.BO has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while BHILSPIN.BO trades at ₹112.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas BHILSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -46.25. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BHILSPIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to BHILSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check BHILSPIN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs AMARJOTHI.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMARJOTHI.BO has a market cap of 963.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while AMARJOTHI.BO trades at ₹140.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas AMARJOTHI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMARJOTHI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to AMARJOTHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check AMARJOTHI.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs VIPPYSP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VIPPYSP.BO has a market cap of 962.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while VIPPYSP.BO trades at ₹155.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas VIPPYSP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VIPPYSP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to VIPPYSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check VIPPYSP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs DIGJAMLMTD.NS Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.NS has a market cap of 895.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while DIGJAMLMTD.NS trades at ₹44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.NS's P/E ratio is 55.99. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check DIGJAMLMTD.NS's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs DEEPAKSP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DEEPAKSP.BO has a market cap of 875.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while DEEPAKSP.BO trades at ₹124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas DEEPAKSP.BO's P/E ratio is 166.85. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DEEPAKSP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check DEEPAKSP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs CFEL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CFEL.BO has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while CFEL.BO trades at ₹33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas CFEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CFEL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to CFEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check CFEL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SANTETX.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SANTETX.BO has a market cap of 850.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SANTETX.BO trades at ₹149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SANTETX.BO's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SANTETX.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SANTETX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SANTETX.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs FLORATX.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLORATX.BO has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while FLORATX.BO trades at ₹138.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas FLORATX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FLORATX.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to FLORATX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check FLORATX.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs AICHAMP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AICHAMP.BO has a market cap of 827.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while AICHAMP.BO trades at ₹27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas AICHAMP.BO's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AICHAMP.BO's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to AICHAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check AICHAMP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs APMIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, APMIN.BO has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while APMIN.BO trades at ₹38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas APMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APMIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to APMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check APMIN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs INDIANACRY.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INDIANACRY.BO has a market cap of 810.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while INDIANACRY.BO trades at ₹6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas INDIANACRY.BO's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to INDIANACRY.BO's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANACRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check INDIANACRY.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SUPTANERY.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUPTANERY.BO has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SUPTANERY.BO trades at ₹6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SUPTANERY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SUPTANERY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SUPTANERY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SUPTANERY.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SHUBHAM.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHUBHAM.BO has a market cap of 711M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SHUBHAM.BO trades at ₹60.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SHUBHAM.BO's P/E ratio is 96.15. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHUBHAM.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SHUBHAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SHUBHAM.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs RIBATEX.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RIBATEX.BO has a market cap of 705.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while RIBATEX.BO trades at ₹70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas RIBATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RIBATEX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to RIBATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check RIBATEX.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ASHNOOR.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASHNOOR.BO has a market cap of 687.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ASHNOOR.BO trades at ₹41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ASHNOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ASHNOOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to ASHNOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ASHNOOR.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ECOHOTELS.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ECOHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 687.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ECOHOTELS.BO trades at ₹12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ECOHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ECOHOTELS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to ECOHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ECOHOTELS.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SKYIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKYIND.BO has a market cap of 658.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SKYIND.BO trades at ₹85.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SKYIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SKYIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SKYIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SKYIND.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs LAKHOTIA.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAKHOTIA.BO has a market cap of 654.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while LAKHOTIA.BO trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas LAKHOTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LAKHOTIA.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to LAKHOTIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check LAKHOTIA.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs VICTMILL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VICTMILL.BO has a market cap of 636.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while VICTMILL.BO trades at ₹6,601.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas VICTMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VICTMILL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to VICTMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check VICTMILL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SHINEFASH.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHINEFASH.BO has a market cap of 630.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SHINEFASH.BO trades at ₹28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SHINEFASH.BO's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHINEFASH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SHINEFASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SHINEFASH.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs AKI.NS Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AKI.NS has a market cap of 629.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while AKI.NS trades at ₹6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas AKI.NS's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AKI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to AKI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check AKI.NS's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs BETXIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BETXIND.BO has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while BETXIND.BO trades at ₹419.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas BETXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BETXIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to BETXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check BETXIND.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs EVERFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EVERFIN.BO has a market cap of 582.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while EVERFIN.BO trades at ₹89.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas EVERFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVERFIN.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to EVERFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check EVERFIN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ARMAN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARMAN.BO has a market cap of 566.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ARMAN.BO trades at ₹108.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ARMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 679.69. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARMAN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to ARMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ARMAN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs MOHITE.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MOHITE.BO has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while MOHITE.BO trades at ₹2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas MOHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MOHITE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to MOHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check MOHITE.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs WIREFABR.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WIREFABR.BO has a market cap of 497.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while WIREFABR.BO trades at ₹148.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas WIREFABR.BO's P/E ratio is 117.90. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WIREFABR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to WIREFABR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check WIREFABR.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs DHANFAB.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DHANFAB.BO has a market cap of 484.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while DHANFAB.BO trades at ₹53.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas DHANFAB.BO's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DHANFAB.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to DHANFAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check DHANFAB.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs KAMADGIRI.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KAMADGIRI.BO has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while KAMADGIRI.BO trades at ₹79.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas KAMADGIRI.BO's P/E ratio is 59.42. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KAMADGIRI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to KAMADGIRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check KAMADGIRI.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GOKAKTEX.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GOKAKTEX.BO has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GOKAKTEX.BO trades at ₹71.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GOKAKTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GOKAKTEX.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to GOKAKTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GOKAKTEX.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs AREXMIS.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AREXMIS.BO has a market cap of 444.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while AREXMIS.BO trades at ₹130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas AREXMIS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AREXMIS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to AREXMIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check AREXMIS.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs HPCOTTON.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HPCOTTON.BO has a market cap of 443.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while HPCOTTON.BO trades at ₹116.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas HPCOTTON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HPCOTTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to HPCOTTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check HPCOTTON.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs KGDENIM.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KGDENIM.BO has a market cap of 436.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while KGDENIM.BO trades at ₹16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas KGDENIM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KGDENIM.BO's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to KGDENIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check KGDENIM.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs CNOVAPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.NS has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while CNOVAPETRO.NS trades at ₹16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas CNOVAPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.NS's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SAMBANDAM.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SAMBANDAM.BO has a market cap of 428M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SAMBANDAM.BO trades at ₹100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SAMBANDAM.BO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SAMBANDAM.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SAMBANDAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SAMBANDAM.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs TILAK.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TILAK.BO has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while TILAK.BO trades at ₹0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas TILAK.BO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TILAK.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to TILAK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check TILAK.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SREEJAYA.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SREEJAYA.BO has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SREEJAYA.BO trades at ₹92.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SREEJAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -172.04. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SREEJAYA.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SREEJAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SREEJAYA.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GTNINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GTNINDS.BO has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GTNINDS.BO trades at ₹22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GTNINDS.BO's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GTNINDS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to GTNINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GTNINDS.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs PBMPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PBMPOLY.BO has a market cap of 388.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while PBMPOLY.BO trades at ₹58.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas PBMPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PBMPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to PBMPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check PBMPOLY.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SURYAAMBA.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SURYAAMBA.BO has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SURYAAMBA.BO trades at ₹125.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SURYAAMBA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SURYAAMBA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SURYAAMBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SURYAAMBA.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ANJANI.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ANJANI.BO has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ANJANI.BO trades at ₹23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ANJANI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANJANI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to ANJANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ANJANI.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ANGEL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ANGEL.BO has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ANGEL.BO trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ANGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANGEL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to ANGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ANGEL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs JAIHINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JAIHINDS.BO has a market cap of 343.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while JAIHINDS.BO trades at ₹54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas JAIHINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 2715.00. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JAIHINDS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to JAIHINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check JAIHINDS.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SWASTIVI.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SWASTIVI.BO has a market cap of 330.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SWASTIVI.BO trades at ₹3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SWASTIVI.BO's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SWASTIVI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to SWASTIVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SWASTIVI.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GINISILK.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GINISILK.BO has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GINISILK.BO trades at ₹61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GINISILK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GINISILK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to GINISILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GINISILK.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs GEMSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GEMSPIN.BO has a market cap of 326.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while GEMSPIN.BO trades at ₹5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas GEMSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -59.11. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GEMSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to GEMSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check GEMSPIN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs ADITYASP.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADITYASP.BO has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while ADITYASP.BO trades at ₹17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas ADITYASP.BO's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADITYASP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to ADITYASP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check ADITYASP.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs CAMEXLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAMEXLTD.BO has a market cap of 301.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while CAMEXLTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas CAMEXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CAMEXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to CAMEXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check CAMEXLTD.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs KATRSPG.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KATRSPG.BO has a market cap of 299.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while KATRSPG.BO trades at ₹105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas KATRSPG.BO's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KATRSPG.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to KATRSPG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check KATRSPG.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs HINDMILL.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HINDMILL.BO has a market cap of 293.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while HINDMILL.BO trades at ₹176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas HINDMILL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HINDMILL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to HINDMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check HINDMILL.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs PASUSPG.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PASUSPG.BO has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while PASUSPG.BO trades at ₹31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas PASUSPG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PASUSPG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to PASUSPG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check PASUSPG.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs YARNSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YARNSYN.BO has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while YARNSYN.BO trades at ₹14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas YARNSYN.BO's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to YARNSYN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to YARNSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check YARNSYN.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs KHOOBSURAT.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KHOOBSURAT.BO has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while KHOOBSURAT.BO trades at ₹0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas KHOOBSURAT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KHOOBSURAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is less volatile compared to KHOOBSURAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check KHOOBSURAT.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs KAPILCO.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KAPILCO.BO has a market cap of 285.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while KAPILCO.BO trades at ₹148.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas KAPILCO.BO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KAPILCO.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to KAPILCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check KAPILCO.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs PARMSILK.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PARMSILK.BO has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while PARMSILK.BO trades at ₹94.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas PARMSILK.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PARMSILK.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to PARMSILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check PARMSILK.BO's competition here
CANDOUR.BO vs SHANTAI.BO Comparison February 2026
CANDOUR.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CANDOUR.BO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHANTAI.BO has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CANDOUR.BO is priced at ₹152.75, while SHANTAI.BO trades at ₹34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CANDOUR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -90.76, whereas SHANTAI.BO's P/E ratio is -32.19. In terms of profitability, CANDOUR.BO's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHANTAI.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CANDOUR.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CANDOUR.BO.Check SHANTAI.BO's competition here