Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 49.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FNLPF trades at $13.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 71.63. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ANGPY trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while IMPUY trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while OICT trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.13. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while IMPUF trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TFPM trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is -196.45. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GMINF trades at $14.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while JINFF trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SILV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while POYYF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PPTA trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -68.18. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GATO trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 905.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EXK trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -26.54. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 892.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ZMPLF trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MMX trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 567.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SLSR trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLSR's ROE of -14.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NSR trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 413.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GLGDF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 126.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 406.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MUX trades at $7.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 336.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ASM trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 285.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ITRG trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 271.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MTA trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -48.92. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 269.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ABBRF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 257.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GROY trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 225.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GOTRF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 191.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NEWP trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -37.17. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 166.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SAPLF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 166.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BRVMF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -83.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 157.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VOXR trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -103.67. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 138.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PAASF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 132.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while IAUFF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 122.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PLG trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 112.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while LUCRF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 112.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BOCOF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 81.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SLVTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 80.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SDRC trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -215.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 77.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while INMNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 74.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ATLX trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ACRG trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 72.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PDLMF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 72.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BKRRF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 62.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TSORF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 58.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ARRKF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 57.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while XANAF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 53.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DNRSF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 53.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FREDF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 51.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ORVMF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 51.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while OCGSF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 50.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CHPGF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -24.63. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 50.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SMDRF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 46.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SSVFF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 46.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DNCVF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 44.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VLMGF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -40.18. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 38.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EMPYF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 38.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PDIV trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TEUTF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 35.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MMNGF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 34.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GROY-WT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 33.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SCTSF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 31.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CAPTF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -31.76. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 31.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ADYRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 30.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ACKRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 27.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DYNR trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while WEXPF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 25.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SSVRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 25.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HGLD trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 25.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while WAMFF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 24.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EQMEF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 24.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while KDKCF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 23.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NAUFF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 23.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TBXXF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 23.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GMDMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 21.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BBBXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 21.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MRZLF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while URVNF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 20.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CJIMF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MERG trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 19.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PVGDF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 19.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 18.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CTMCF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 18.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BYRG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 17.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SMOFF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +74.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 17.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ELRFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 16.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BRGC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 16.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 16.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ESGLF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 15.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 14.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ATEPF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 14.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RKHNF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GBRRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 13.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while LBCMF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SUNPF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 13.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SNNGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FSTTF has a market cap of 12.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FSTTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FSTTF's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSTTF's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AKEMF has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AKEMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AKEMF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKEMF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AKEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BWCGF has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BWCGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BWCGF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWCGF's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to BWCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MHTZF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 11.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while KGFMF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TSLVF has a market cap of 11.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TSLVF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TSLVF's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSLVF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 11.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CNRIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FYMNF has a market cap of 11.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FYMNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FYMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FYMNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FYMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 11.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while STRFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 11.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while THMG trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THMG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HEXPF has a market cap of 10.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HEXPF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HEXPF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEXPF's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to HEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MPVDF has a market cap of 10.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MPVDF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MPVDF's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPVDF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MPVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RVSDF has a market cap of 10.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RVSDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RVSDF's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVSDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to RVSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 10.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while LGCXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AGMRF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MLRKF has a market cap of 9.70M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MLRKF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MLRKF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MLRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AHNMF has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AHNMF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AHNMF's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHNMF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to AHNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VTXXF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 9.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PGLDF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 9.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PNTRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 9.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HEGLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, QGLDF has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while QGLDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas QGLDF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QGLDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to QGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AHNR has a market cap of 8.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AHNR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AHNR's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHNR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CMAUF has a market cap of 7.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CMAUF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CMAUF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMAUF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CMAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 7.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SBMCF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 7.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SBLRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CLRMF has a market cap of 7.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CLRMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CLRMF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLRMF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CLRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FPVTF has a market cap of 6.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FPVTF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FPVTF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPVTF's ROE of +2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FPVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MXROF has a market cap of 6.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MXROF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MXROF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MXROF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MXROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DDIAF has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DDIAF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DDIAF's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDIAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DDIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BDGCF has a market cap of 5.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BDGCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BDGCF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDGCF's ROE of -729.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to BDGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PTNUF has a market cap of 5.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PTNUF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PTNUF's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTNUF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to PTNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 5.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HBEIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of +19.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RIINF has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RIINF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RIINF's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to RIINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SILS has a market cap of 5.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SILS trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SILS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SILS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SILS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NMEX has a market cap of 5.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NMEX trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMEX's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NOCSF has a market cap of 5.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NOCSF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NOCSF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOCSF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to NOCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MAGE has a market cap of 5.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MAGE trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MAGE's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAGE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MAGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TSDRF has a market cap of 4.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TSDRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TSDRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSDRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TSDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RGXTF has a market cap of 4.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RGXTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RGXTF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGXTF's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RGXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, COSRF has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while COSRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas COSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COSRF's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to COSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AMNP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TARSF has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TARSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TARSF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TARSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TARSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BELDF has a market cap of 4.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BELDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BELDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BELDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SLRRF has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SLRRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SLRRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLRRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SLRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NBRI has a market cap of 4.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NBRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RLYGF has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RLYGF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RLYGF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLYGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RLYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PLLMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, BXXRF has a market cap of 4.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while BXXRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas BXXRF's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXXRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to BXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MXTLF has a market cap of 4.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MXTLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MXTLF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MXTLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MXTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, LECRF has a market cap of 3.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while LECRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LECRF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LECRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to LECRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NHAWF has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NHAWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NHAWF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHAWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NHAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GGLXF has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GGLXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GGLXF's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGLXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 3.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RITE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DRIFF has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DRIFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DRIFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DRIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SRGZ has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SRGZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SRGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRGZ's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SRGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RJKAF has a market cap of 3.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RJKAF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RJKAF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RJKAF's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to RJKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GORIF has a market cap of 3.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GORIF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GORIF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GORIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GLHRF has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GLHRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GLHRF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLHRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to GLHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VIPRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VIZNF has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VIZNF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VIZNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIZNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to VIZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NCMBF has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NCMBF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NCMBF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCMBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NCMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MNMRF has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MNMRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MNMRF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNMRF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MNMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SWYDF has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SWYDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SWYDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWYDF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SWYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GIDMF has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GIDMF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GIDMF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIDMF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GIDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, OLVRF has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while OLVRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas OLVRF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLVRF's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to OLVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VMSSF has a market cap of 2.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VMSSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VMSSF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VMSSF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to VMSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, XTRRF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while XTRRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas XTRRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XTRRF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to XTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CFTN has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CFTN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CFTN's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFTN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CFTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CGDXF has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CGDXF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CGDXF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGDXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CGDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, COCCF has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while COCCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas COCCF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COCCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to COCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CWVWF has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CWVWF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CWVWF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWVWF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CWVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GNYPF has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GNYPF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GNYPF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNYPF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to GNYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FNGGF has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FNGGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FNGGF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNGGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FMNJ has a market cap of 2.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FMNJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FMNJ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMNJ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FMNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ENDMF has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ENDMF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ENDMF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENDMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ENDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SWLFF has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SWLFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SWLFF's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWLFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SWLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AUMN trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, STNRF has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while STNRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas STNRF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STNRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to STNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CROOF has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CROOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CROOF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CROOF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DIOSF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DIOSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DIOSF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIOSF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to DIOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MONGF has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MONGF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MONGF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GDPHF has a market cap of 2.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GDPHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GDPHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDPHF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to GDPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, USHAF has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while USHAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas USHAF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USHAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to USHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GSRCF has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GSRCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GSRCF's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSRCF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AXDDF has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AXDDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AXDDF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXDDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AXDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DFIFF has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DFIFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DFIFF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DFIFF's ROE of +28.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to DFIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TRSFF has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TRSFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TRSFF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRSFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TRSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AUCCF has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AUCCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AUCCF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUCCF's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to AUCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ASDZF has a market cap of 1.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ASDZF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ASDZF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASDZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to ASDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MTLCF has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MTLCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MTLCF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTLCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MTLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GEMZ has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GEMZ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GEMZ's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GEMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DMIFF has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DMIFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DMIFF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMIFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to DMIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CHELF has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CHELF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CHELF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHELF's ROE of -15.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, OGGNF has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while OGGNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas OGGNF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGGNF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to OGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PEXZF has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PEXZF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PEXZF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEXZF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PEXZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CMCXF has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CMCXF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CMCXF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMCXF's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CHKKF has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CHKKF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CHKKF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHKKF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CHKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FBSGF has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FBSGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FBSGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBSGF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FBSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MSTXF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MSTXF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MSTXF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSTXF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PBMFF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PBMFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PBMFF's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBMFF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PBMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MBYMF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MBYMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MBYMF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBYMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MBYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PSRVF has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PSRVF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PSRVF's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSRVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to PSRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MGLDF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MGLDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MGLDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGLDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MMMRF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MMMRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MMMRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMMRF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MMMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MSLVF has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MSLVF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MSLVF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSLVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MSLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NWHAF has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NWHAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NWHAF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWHAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to NWHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DDNFF has a market cap of 1.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DDNFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DDNFF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDNFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DDNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GMEI has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GMEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GMEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GMEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SVGAF has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SVGAF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SVGAF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SVGAF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SVGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ETFLF has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ETFLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ETFLF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETFLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ETFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, JDNRF has a market cap of 1.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while JDNRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas JDNRF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to JDNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EMLL has a market cap of 973666.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EMLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EMLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMLL's ROE of +14.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to EMLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CMILF has a market cap of 967689.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CMILF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CMILF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMILF's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CMILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, KGSSF has a market cap of 945195.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while KGSSF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KGSSF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGSSF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to KGSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MEXGF has a market cap of 883201.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MEXGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MEXGF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEXGF's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MEXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TNGMF has a market cap of 874134.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TNGMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TNGMF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNGMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TNGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, WSRUF has a market cap of 833628.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while WSRUF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas WSRUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSRUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to WSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DSCVF has a market cap of 831085.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DSCVF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DSCVF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSCVF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DSCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, IFAM has a market cap of 685605.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while IFAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IFAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFAM's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to IFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MCKRF has a market cap of 680823.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MCKRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MCKRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCKRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FBCPF has a market cap of 678542.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FBCPF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FBCPF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBCPF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, KGHZF has a market cap of 671862.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while KGHZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas KGHZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGHZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to KGHZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RMDFF has a market cap of 632332.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RMDFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RMDFF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMDFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RMDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EMSKF has a market cap of 610448.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EMSKF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EMSKF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMSKF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to EMSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ORAGF has a market cap of 527331.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ORAGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ORAGF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORAGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to ORAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DSCR has a market cap of 498691.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DSCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DSCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSCR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DSCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GGSM has a market cap of 435334.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GGSM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GGSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGSM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GGSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SSRSF has a market cap of 433218.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SSRSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SSRSF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSRSF's ROE of -20.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to SSRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PMMEF has a market cap of 421977.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PMMEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PMMEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMMEF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PMMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ANGCF has a market cap of 401429.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ANGCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ANGCF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANGCF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ANGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HWKDF has a market cap of 399420.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HWKDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HWKDF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWKDF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to HWKDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, THRA has a market cap of 392118.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while THRA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas THRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to THRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MXSG has a market cap of 330411.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MXSG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MXSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MXSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MXSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, LNXGF has a market cap of 198566.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while LNXGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas LNXGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to LNXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NATUF has a market cap of 190497.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NATUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NATUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to NATUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ECPN has a market cap of 175104.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ECPN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ECPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ECPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CGLD has a market cap of 130767.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CGLD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CGLD's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGLD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PVEN has a market cap of 126000.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PVEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PVEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PVEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to PVEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TRRI has a market cap of 106874.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TRRI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRRI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to TRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ESGI has a market cap of 57664.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ESGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ESGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESGI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ESGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GDPEF has a market cap of 52437.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GDPEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GDPEF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDPEF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GDPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, AZGFF has a market cap of 35811.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while AZGFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas AZGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZGFF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to AZGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, IPMG has a market cap of 32525.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while IPMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IPMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to IPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ABZUF has a market cap of 28511.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ABZUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ABZUF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABZUF's ROE of -5.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ABZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RYMM has a market cap of 24640.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RYMM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RYMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYMM's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RYMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, EVBC has a market cap of 17034.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while EVBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas EVBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to EVBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, PGVI has a market cap of 8782.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while PGVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas PGVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to PGVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TFZI has a market cap of 8756.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TFZI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TFZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TFZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GRYEF has a market cap of 8595.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GRYEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GRYEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRYEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GRYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MAOMF has a market cap of 8481.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MAOMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MAOMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to MAOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VIPV has a market cap of 6069.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VIPV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VIPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to VIPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, IGRU has a market cap of 5106.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while IGRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas IGRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to IGRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HLLXF has a market cap of 4654.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HLLXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HLLXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLLXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to HLLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HMZMF has a market cap of 1870.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HMZMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HMZMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMZMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to HMZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, GARQF has a market cap of 1622.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while GARQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas GARQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to GARQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, FMGDF has a market cap of 1463.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while FMGDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas FMGDF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to FMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MTTGF has a market cap of 1296.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MTTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MTTGF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TMBXF has a market cap of 1221.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TMBXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TMBXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMBXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, NUSMF has a market cap of 683.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while NUSMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas NUSMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUSMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to NUSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CADIF has a market cap of 503.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CADIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CADIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADIF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to CADIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, RVNG has a market cap of 352.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while RVNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas RVNG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to RVNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, HSHL has a market cap of 246.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while HSHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas HSHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to HSHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TTXP has a market cap of 191.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TTXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TTXP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTXP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, SELSF has a market cap of 117.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while SELSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas SELSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SELSF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to SELSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, ZNXT has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while ZNXT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas ZNXT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZNXT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to ZNXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, INFX has a market cap of 25.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while INFX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas INFX's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to INFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, MSLM has a market cap of 7.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while MSLM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas MSLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to MSLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, VOXCF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while VOXCF trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas VOXCF's P/E ratio is -23.07. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOXCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to VOXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, DNRSD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while DNRSD trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas DNRSD's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNRSD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to DNRSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, CRTID comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while CRTID trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas CRTID's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRTID's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is less volatile compared to CRTID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.

BVN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BVN stands at 3.77B. In comparison, TRQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVN is priced at $14.87, while TRQ trades at $31.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BVN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.25, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, BVN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVN is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVN.