Bitcoin Depot Inc.
Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTMWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTMWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTMWW | $0.40 | -19.19% | 259.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BNJ | $15.55 | +0.06% | 110.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.52% |
| SFB | $20.92 | +0.97% | 11.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.58% |
| MGRB | $17.32 | -0.57% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGR | $21.16 | -0.52% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.56 | +0.26% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| CGBDL | $26.07 | +1.05% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +7.86% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +13.71% |
| FCRX | $24.95 | +0.32% | 927.6M | 176.27 | $0.14 | +5.02% |
| BULLW | $5.29 | -7.85% | 736.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BTMWW vs BNJ Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while BNJ trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check BNJ's competition here
BTMWW vs SFB Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while SFB trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check SFB's competition here
BTMWW vs MGRB Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while MGRB trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check MGRB's competition here
BTMWW vs MGR Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while MGR trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check MGR's competition here
BTMWW vs MGRD Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while MGRD trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check MGRD's competition here
BTMWW vs CGBDL Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while CGBDL trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check CGBDL's competition here
BTMWW vs TRINL Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check TRINL's competition here
BTMWW vs FCRX Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 927.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while FCRX trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 176.27. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check FCRX's competition here
BTMWW vs BULLW Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 736.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while BULLW trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check BULLW's competition here
BTMWW vs GLADZ Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while GLADZ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check GLADZ's competition here
BTMWW vs SAJ Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while SAJ trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check SAJ's competition here
BTMWW vs SAZ Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 400.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while SAZ trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check SAZ's competition here
BTMWW vs SAY Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 399.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while SAY trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check SAY's competition here
BTMWW vs WHFCL Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while WHFCL trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check WHFCL's competition here
BTMWW vs RILYZ Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while RILYZ trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check RILYZ's competition here
BTMWW vs GECCZ Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while GECCZ trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check GECCZ's competition here
BTMWW vs GEGGL Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while GEGGL trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check GEGGL's competition here
BTMWW vs STSB Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check STSB's competition here
BTMWW vs CAS Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while CAS trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check CAS's competition here
BTMWW vs ZBAI Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while ZBAI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check ZBAI's competition here
BTMWW vs HBTA Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while HBTA trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check HBTA's competition here
BTMWW vs GJH Comparison August 2025
BTMWW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTMWW stands at 259.3M. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTMWW is priced at $0.40, while GJH trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTMWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTMWW's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTMWW is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTMWW.Check GJH's competition here