Baytex Energy Corp.
Baytex Energy Corp. BTE.TO Peers
See (BTE.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTE.TO | $2.28 | +0.44% | 1.8B | 5.70 | $0.40 | +3.96% |
| CNQ.TO | $42.80 | +0.45% | 89.8B | 12.02 | $3.56 | +5.13% |
| TOU.TO | $64.08 | +0.13% | 24B | 18.96 | $3.38 | +2.65% |
| ARX.TO | $29.83 | +0.51% | 17.5B | 13.20 | $2.26 | +2.41% |
| OVV.TO | $50.11 | +1.83% | 13B | 15.32 | $3.27 | +3.35% |
| WCP.TO | $8.95 | +2.52% | 11B | 5.85 | $1.53 | +8.13% |
| CPG.TO | $11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | $0.49 | +5.03% |
| MEG.TO | $24.74 | +0.12% | 6.3B | 10.62 | $2.33 | +1.21% |
| SCR.TO | $29.20 | +1.57% | 6.3B | 8.82 | $3.31 | +2.62% |
| ERF.TO | $26.78 | -3.36% | 5.7B | 10.93 | $2.45 | +1.19% |
Stock Comparison
BTE.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CNQ.TO trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TOU.TO trades at $64.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while ARX.TO trades at $29.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while OVV.TO trades at $50.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while WCP.TO trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CPG.TO trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while MEG.TO trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SCR.TO trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while ERF.TO trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PSK.TO trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PEY.TO trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while NVA.TO trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs POU.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while POU.TO trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while ATH.TO trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while IPCO.TO trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TVE.TO trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while FRU.TO trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while AAV.TO trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -64.06. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while BIR.TO trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while HWX.TO trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs VET.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while VET.TO trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while KEL.TO trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PXT.TO trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while AOI.TO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CR.TO trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CJ.TO trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 802.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while VLE.TO trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 762.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while KEC.TO trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while BIR-PA.TO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 610.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SDE.TO trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 558.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TAL.TO trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PIPE.TO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 541.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SGY.TO trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 504.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while OBE.TO trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 492.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TNZ.TO trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -39.67. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while FEC.TO trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 423M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while GFR.TO trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TGL.TO trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SOIL.TO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while KEI.TO trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while ITE.TO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while IPO.TO trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while GTE.TO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PNE.TO trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PRQ.TO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while RBY.TO trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while BNE.TO trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 73.60. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while GXE.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CDR.TO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while QEC.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while JOY.TO trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PEA.TO trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while YGR.TO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CNE.TO trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while FORZ.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TXP.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PPR.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while PMT.TO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while XOP.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BTE.TO has daily volatility of 1.32 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
BTE.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while TCF.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SQX.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while BNG.TO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while OIL.CN trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while JBR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SHP.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while BDR.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 917.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while VIK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while WOGC.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while GTOO.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs EI.CN Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while EI.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while BIR-PC.TO trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while SRX.TO trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CNU.TO trades at $121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.
BTE.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison
BTE.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTE.TO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTE.TO is priced at $2.28, while CPI.TO trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BTE.TO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTE.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTE.TO.