Brenntag SE
Brenntag SE (BNTGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNTGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNTGY | $12.35 | -0.32% | 8.9B | 14.51 | $0.85 | +3.76% |
| AIQUY | $39.37 | -0.08% | 113.7B | 28.79 | $1.37 | +1.85% |
| AIQUF | $196.80 | +0.11% | 113.2B | 29.14 | $6.74 | +1.89% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 48.4B | -509.09 | -$0.11 | +0.04% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | +0.07% |
| GVDBF | $4,476.00 | +0.15% | 41.3B | 31.34 | $142.82 | +1.77% |
| SKFOF | $243.05 | +2.89% | 38.7B | 24.78 | $9.73 | +0.85% |
| GVDNY | $83.06 | -0.74% | 38.2B | 28.26 | $2.93 | +1.87% |
| SXYAY | $23.24 | -1.44% | 37.4B | 24.52 | $0.95 | +3.76% |
| AKZOY | $20.88 | -0.57% | 32.2B | 22.49 | $0.93 | +3.56% |
Stock Comparison
BNTGY vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AIQUY trades at $39.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AIQUY's competition here
BNTGY vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AIQUF trades at $196.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AIQUF's competition here
BNTGY vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -509.09. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check PTCAY's competition here
BNTGY vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check PTPIF's competition here
BNTGY vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while GVDBF trades at $4,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check GVDBF's competition here
BNTGY vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SKFOF trades at $243.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SKFOF's competition here
BNTGY vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while GVDNY trades at $83.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check GVDNY's competition here
BNTGY vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SXYAY trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SXYAY's competition here
BNTGY vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AKZOY trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AKZOY's competition here
BNTGY vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NVZMY trades at $65.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 56.66. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NVZMY's competition here
BNTGY vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NVZMF trades at $64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NVZMF's competition here
BNTGY vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NPCPF's competition here
BNTGY vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check EMSHF's competition here
BNTGY vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NDEKF trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NDEKF's competition here
BNTGY vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CVVTF trades at $69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -30.55. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CVVTF's competition here
BNTGY vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while COVTY trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.53. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check COVTY's competition here
BNTGY vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SYIEF trades at $91.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SYIEF's competition here
BNTGY vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SYIEY trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SYIEY's competition here
BNTGY vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AKZOF's competition here
BNTGY vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CRTSF's competition here
BNTGY vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CHYHY's competition here
BNTGY vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while EVKIF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check EVKIF's competition here
BNTGY vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while BNTGF trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check BNTGF's competition here
BNTGY vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while EVKIY trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check EVKIY's competition here
BNTGY vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SCVUF's competition here
BNTGY vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check IMDZF's competition here
BNTGY vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ASGLF's competition here
BNTGY vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ASGLY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ASGLY's competition here
BNTGY vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while OCLDY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 109.50. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check OCLDY's competition here
BNTGY vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while FUPBY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check FUPBY's competition here
BNTGY vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check FUPEF's competition here
BNTGY vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NDEKY trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NDEKY's competition here
BNTGY vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SCVPY's competition here
BNTGY vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 102.08. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check OCLDF's competition here
BNTGY vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while COIHF trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check COIHF's competition here
BNTGY vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ARKAF's competition here
BNTGY vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ARKAY trades at $67.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ARKAY's competition here
BNTGY vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while COIHY trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check COIHY's competition here
BNTGY vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check KDSKF's competition here
BNTGY vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check MITUF's competition here
BNTGY vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check FUPPF's competition here
BNTGY vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while MITUY trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check MITUY's competition here
BNTGY vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while JMPLY trades at $46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check JMPLY's competition here
BNTGY vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AZLGF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AZLGF's competition here
BNTGY vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check JMPLF's competition here
BNTGY vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while WKCMF trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check WKCMF's competition here
BNTGY vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CLZNF's competition here
BNTGY vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AWTRF's competition here
BNTGY vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CLZNY trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CLZNY's competition here
BNTGY vs NOFCF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NOFCF's competition here
BNTGY vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while MBGCF trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check MBGCF's competition here
BNTGY vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while HXPLF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check HXPLF's competition here
BNTGY vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check HXXPY's competition here
BNTGY vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SASOF trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SASOF's competition here
BNTGY vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ICPVF's competition here
BNTGY vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check INCZY's competition here
BNTGY vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check KSANF's competition here
BNTGY vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while KPTCY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check KPTCY's competition here
BNTGY vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TKKYY's competition here
BNTGY vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while LNXSF trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check LNXSF's competition here
BNTGY vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while LNXSY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check LNXSY's competition here
BNTGY vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check DACHF's competition here
BNTGY vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check IRLCF's competition here
BNTGY vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ZEOOY's competition here
BNTGY vs OCINF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while OCINF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check OCINF's competition here
BNTGY vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ZEOOF's competition here
BNTGY vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check BRRDF's competition here
BNTGY vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check KPLIF's competition here
BNTGY vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TKYMY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TKYMY's competition here
BNTGY vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check KANKF's competition here
BNTGY vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ALZCF's competition here
BNTGY vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ELKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ELKEF's competition here
BNTGY vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TKCBF's competition here
BNTGY vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ELMTY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -30.74. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ELMTY's competition here
BNTGY vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while EMNSF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check EMNSF's competition here
BNTGY vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TKCBY's competition here
BNTGY vs CSNVF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CSNVF trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CSNVF's competition here
BNTGY vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check HUABF's competition here
BNTGY vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CSNVY's competition here
BNTGY vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check CUYRF's competition here
BNTGY vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check ALPKF's competition here
BNTGY vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TKYMF's competition here
BNTGY vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check LNTEF's competition here
BNTGY vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check HUIHY's competition here
BNTGY vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 858.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while VBVBF trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.85. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check VBVBF's competition here
BNTGY vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check AECLY's competition here
BNTGY vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SKKAF's competition here
BNTGY vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check HASGF's competition here
BNTGY vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 801.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while FPLSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check FPLSF's competition here
BNTGY vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check VTXPF's competition here
BNTGY vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check DALQF's competition here
BNTGY vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SYCHF's competition here
BNTGY vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while DLNDY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check DLNDY's competition here
BNTGY vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TYOBY's competition here
BNTGY vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 478.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NOPMF trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NOPMF's competition here
BNTGY vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check FLRAF's competition here
BNTGY vs TNMAF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check TNMAF's competition here
BNTGY vs NCRBF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check NCRBF's competition here
BNTGY vs SYYYF Comparison August 2025
BNTGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTGY stands at 8.9B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTGY is priced at $12.35, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTGY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BNTGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTGY is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTGY.Check SYYYF's competition here