BlueScope Steel Limited
BlueScope Steel Limited BLSFF Peers
See (BLSFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLSFF | $15.07 | N/A | 6.6B | 19.08 | $0.79 | +2.59% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | N/A | 115.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +9.19% |
| AMSYF | $31.00 | N/A | 23.8B | 19.75 | $1.57 | +1.69% |
| VLOWY | $3.63 | -1.09% | 21.3B | 8.85 | $0.41 | +9.35% |
| NISTF | $19.75 | -1.37% | 20.6B | 8.55 | $2.31 | +0.04% |
| NPSCY | $6.53 | -1.29% | 20.5B | 8.47 | $0.77 | +1.84% |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +119.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | +31.52% |
| CISXF | $19.87 | +33.36% | 15.2B | 141.93 | $0.14 | +0.04% |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | N/A | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| JFEEF | $11.40 | -12.71% | 7.3B | 12.00 | $0.95 | +0.04% |
Stock Comparison
BLSFF vs TATLY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to TATLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs AMSYF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while AMSYF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs VLOWY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while VLOWY trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs NISTF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while NISTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs NPSCY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while NPSCY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SVJTY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to SVJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs CISXF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CISXF trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 141.93. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs HMTLY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to HMTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs JFEEF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while JFEEF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs BLSFY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while BLSFY trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to BLSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs KUMBF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to KUMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SSAAY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SSAAY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SSAAF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SSAAF trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs KBSTF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while KBSTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to KBSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs KIROY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while KIROY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs ICHBF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to ICHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs VLOUF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while VLOUF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to VLOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs VLPNF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs OUTKY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while OUTKY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -41.20. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs MAANF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while MAANF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs YMTKF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to YMTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs ANIOY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while ANIOY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to ANIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs STZHF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to STZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs ANGGF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while ANGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs APEMY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while APEMY trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs APMSF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while APMSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to APMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SMSMY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SMSMY trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -91.73. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs EVRZF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to EVRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs MCHIF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to MCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SMUPF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SMUPF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -78.64. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs CIAFF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CIAFF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs CKSNY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CKSNY trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to CKSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs LIFZF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while LIFZF trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs OUTFF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SZGPF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SZGPF trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to SZGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs CKSNF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CKSNF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SZGPY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SZGPY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs CUGCF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CUGCF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs USNZY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while USNZY trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs SYPLF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs KLKNF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to KLKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs ERELY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while ERELY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs YDWAF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while YDWAF trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs CUGCY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CUGCY trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to CUGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs FEEXY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 409.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while FEEXY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs OSKXF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs FEEXF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while FEEXF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs MTGRF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while MTGRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs MTGRY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while MTGRY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs AMSIY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs VLPNY Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while VLPNY trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs WEBC Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while WEBC trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to WEBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs GRRLF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs ARCXF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs TWIRF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while TWIRF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to TWIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs IRNRF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs GSIH Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to GSIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs HMTLF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to HMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs NPSTF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BLSFF has daily volatility of 10.50 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.
BLSFF vs CWRN Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to CWRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.
BLSFF vs ZNGGF Comparison
BLSFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLSFF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BLSFF is priced at $15.07, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLSFF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, BLSFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLSFF is more volatile compared to ZNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLSFF.