Bhartiya International Ltd.
Bhartiya International Ltd. (BIL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BIL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIL.BO | ₹850.95 | -0.50% | 11.1B | 28.91 | ₹28.70 | N/A |
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹1,047.30 | -0.81% | 282.3B | 72.70 | ₹14.25 | +1.93% |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹812.50 | -1.59% | 104.4B | 61.28 | ₹13.25 | +1.11% |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹812.35 | -1.59% | 104.4B | 58.66 | ₹13.84 | +1.11% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,867.55 | +1.10% | 90.2B | 53.76 | ₹34.26 | N/A |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,866.60 | +1.13% | 90B | 53.65 | ₹34.23 | +0.19% |
| RELAXO.NS | ₹356.80 | -2.34% | 89.1B | 53.12 | ₹6.74 | +0.84% |
| RELAXO.BO | ₹356.50 | -2.28% | 88.8B | 52.92 | ₹6.74 | +0.84% |
| CAMPUS.NS | ₹269.15 | +0.37% | 81B | 57.53 | ₹4.61 | +0.11% |
| CAMPUS.BO | ₹269.00 | +0.35% | 80.8B | 57.34 | ₹4.61 | +0.11% |
Stock Comparison
BIL.BO vs METROBRAND.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, METROBRAND.NS has a market cap of 282.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while METROBRAND.NS trades at ₹1,047.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas METROBRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 72.70. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to METROBRAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check METROBRAND.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹812.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹812.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs SAFARI.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,867.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SAFARI.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,866.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 53.65. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs RELAXO.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹356.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs RELAXO.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹356.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹269.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 57.53. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs VIPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.74. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs VIPIND.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VIPIND.NS has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while VIPIND.NS trades at ₹372.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas VIPIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIPIND.NS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to VIPIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check VIPIND.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs BIL.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BIL.NS trades at ₹853.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BIL.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹990.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 75.66. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 56.69. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 56.65. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs SREEL.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹201.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs SREEL.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹194.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs MANBRO.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 264.25. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹247.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹247.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs LEHAR.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹231.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹267.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 708.11. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 686.58. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹671.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 5295.42. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs KHADIM.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KHADIM.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while KHADIM.NS trades at ₹136.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas KHADIM.NS's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KHADIM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to KHADIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check KHADIM.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs KHADIM.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs VANDANA.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs VIRAT.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹402.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 108.82. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹160.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs CEENIK.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹280.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹75.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 956.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹376.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 822.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹126.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 803M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 801.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹251.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs ELAND.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 783.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 615.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹34.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
BIL.BO vs AKI.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 615.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while AKI.BO trades at ₹6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check AKI.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SPENTA.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -49.42. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs VIVAA.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs NBFOOT.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NBFOOT.BO has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while NBFOOT.BO trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas NBFOOT.BO's P/E ratio is -52.53. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBFOOT.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to NBFOOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check NBFOOT.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs WELTI.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs EUROLED.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs KARANWO.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 538.00. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs SRIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is less volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
BIL.BO vs AKM.BO Comparison February 2026
BIL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIL.BO stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BIL.BO is priced at ₹850.95, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.91, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BIL.BO is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIL.BO.Check AKM.BO's competition here