bioAffinity Technologies, Inc.
bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAFW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BIAFW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Diagnostics & Research Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIAFW | $0.22 | +0.00% | 992K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DHR-PB | $1,261.26 | -0.78% | 916.8B | 146.01 | $8.64 | +0.61% |
| TMO | $515.12 | +0.00% | 192.1B | 28.78 | $17.76 | +0.34% |
| DHR | $211.25 | -0.00% | 148.1B | 41.65 | $5.03 | +0.61% |
| IDXX | $630.73 | +0.00% | 50.8B | 48.60 | $13.08 | N/A |
| A | $126.34 | +0.00% | 34.8B | 26.89 | $4.57 | +0.82% |
| NTRA | $216.36 | +0.00% | 29.3B | -93.04 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| IQV | $169.36 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 21.13 | $7.84 | N/A |
| MTD | $1,376.53 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 32.74 | $42.09 | N/A |
| DGX | $202.44 | +0.00% | 22.5B | 23.13 | $8.75 | +1.58% |
Stock Comparison
BIAFW vs DHR-PB Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check DHR-PB's competition here
BIAFW vs TMO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 192.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while TMO trades at $515.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check TMO's competition here
BIAFW vs DHR Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while DHR trades at $211.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 41.65. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check DHR's competition here
BIAFW vs IDXX Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while IDXX trades at $630.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check IDXX's competition here
BIAFW vs A Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, A has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while A trades at $126.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check A's competition here
BIAFW vs NTRA Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while NTRA trades at $216.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -93.04. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check NTRA's competition here
BIAFW vs IQV Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while IQV trades at $169.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check IQV's competition here
BIAFW vs MTD Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MTD trades at $1,376.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MTD's ROE of -4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MTD's competition here
BIAFW vs DGX Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while DGX trades at $202.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check DGX's competition here
BIAFW vs WAT Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while WAT trades at $328.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check WAT's competition here
BIAFW vs EXAS Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while EXAS trades at $103.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -94.03. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check EXAS's competition here
BIAFW vs ILMN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ILMN trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ILMN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ILMN's competition here
BIAFW vs PKI Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while PKI trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check PKI's competition here
BIAFW vs GH Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while GH trades at $106.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -32.02. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to GH's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check GH's competition here
BIAFW vs MEDP Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MEDP trades at $446.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MEDP's competition here
BIAFW vs RVTY Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while RVTY trades at $99.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check RVTY's competition here
BIAFW vs QGEN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while QGEN trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check QGEN's competition here
BIAFW vs CRL Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CRL trades at $164.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is -110.47. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CRL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CRL's competition here
BIAFW vs ICLR Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ICLR trades at $98.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ICLR's competition here
BIAFW vs RDNT Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while RDNT trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is -438.00. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to RDNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check RDNT's competition here
BIAFW vs SHC Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while SHC trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 87.45. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check SHC's competition here
BIAFW vs SYNH Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while SYNH trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check SYNH's competition here
BIAFW vs BLLN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BLLN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BLLN trades at $90.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLLN's P/E ratio is -341.68. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BLLN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BLLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BLLN's competition here
BIAFW vs OLK Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while OLK trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check OLK's competition here
BIAFW vs TWST Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while TWST trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -38.26. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check TWST's competition here
BIAFW vs NEOG Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while NEOG trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check NEOG's competition here
BIAFW vs GRAL Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, GRAL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while GRAL trades at $101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAL's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to GRAL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to GRAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check GRAL's competition here
BIAFW vs VIVO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while VIVO trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to VIVO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check VIVO's competition here
BIAFW vs CDNA Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 966.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CDNA trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CDNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CDNA's competition here
BIAFW vs OPK Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, OPK has a market cap of 921.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while OPK trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to OPK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to OPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check OPK's competition here
BIAFW vs CSTL Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 852.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CSTL trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is -71.24. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CSTL's competition here
BIAFW vs PSNL Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while PSNL trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check PSNL's competition here
BIAFW vs FLGT Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, FLGT has a market cap of 716.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while FLGT trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGT's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to FLGT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to FLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check FLGT's competition here
BIAFW vs GRALV Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while GRALV trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check GRALV's competition here
BIAFW vs CO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CO's competition here
BIAFW vs MYGN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 399.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MYGN trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MYGN's competition here
BIAFW vs ACRS Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ACRS has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ACRS trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRS's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ACRS's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ACRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ACRS's competition here
BIAFW vs FLDM Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, FLDM has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while FLDM trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDM's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to FLDM's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to FLDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check FLDM's competition here
BIAFW vs NEO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while NEO trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check NEO's competition here
BIAFW vs OPGN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, OPGN has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while OPGN trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPGN's P/E ratio is 133.28. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to OPGN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to OPGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check OPGN's competition here
BIAFW vs PRE Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 239.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while PRE trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check PRE's competition here
BIAFW vs MDXH Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 179.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MDXH trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MDXH's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MDXH's competition here
BIAFW vs ATLN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ATLN trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ATLN's ROE of +6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ATLN's competition here
BIAFW vs GTH Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while GTH trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to GTH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check GTH's competition here
BIAFW vs GENE Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while GENE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to GENE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check GENE's competition here
BIAFW vs BDSX Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BDSX trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -5.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BDSX's competition here
BIAFW vs SERA Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while SERA trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check SERA's competition here
BIAFW vs STIM Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while STIM trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to STIM's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check STIM's competition here
BIAFW vs DRIO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while DRIO trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to DRIO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check DRIO's competition here
BIAFW vs XGN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while XGN trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check XGN's competition here
BIAFW vs PRPO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while PRPO trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -31.21. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check PRPO's competition here
BIAFW vs STRR Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while STRR trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check STRR's competition here
BIAFW vs BNR Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BNR trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -17.27. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BNR's competition here
BIAFW vs STRRP Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while STRRP trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check STRRP's competition here
BIAFW vs AKU Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while AKU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check AKU's competition here
BIAFW vs VNRX Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, VNRX has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while VNRX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNRX's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to VNRX's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to VNRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check VNRX's competition here
BIAFW vs CEMI Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CEMI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CEMI's competition here
BIAFW vs ENZ Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ENZ trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ENZ's competition here
BIAFW vs PMD Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while PMD trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check PMD's competition here
BIAFW vs ME Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ME trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ME's ROE of -5.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ME's competition here
BIAFW vs CHEK Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CHEK trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CHEK's ROE of +12.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CHEK's competition here
BIAFW vs MBAI Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MBAI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MBAI trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBAI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MBAI's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MBAI's competition here
BIAFW vs CNTG Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while CNTG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check CNTG's competition here
BIAFW vs NOTV Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while NOTV trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check NOTV's competition here
BIAFW vs TRIB Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while TRIB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check TRIB's competition here
BIAFW vs APDN Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while APDN trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to APDN's ROE of -8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check APDN's competition here
BIAFW vs NVTA Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while NVTA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to NVTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check NVTA's competition here
BIAFW vs LMDXW Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check LMDXW's competition here
BIAFW vs LMDX Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while LMDX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check LMDX's competition here
BIAFW vs BIAF Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BIAF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BIAF's competition here
BIAFW vs ADVB Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ADVB trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ADVB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ADVB's competition here
BIAFW vs BGLC Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BGLC trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BGLC's competition here
BIAFW vs BNGO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BNGO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BNGO's competition here
BIAFW vs DMTK Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while DMTK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check DMTK's competition here
BIAFW vs NDRA Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while NDRA trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check NDRA's competition here
BIAFW vs INBS Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while INBS trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check INBS's competition here
BIAFW vs SQL Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, SQL has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while SQL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to SQL's ROE of +9.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to SQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check SQL's competition here
BIAFW vs MYNZ Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MYNZ trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MYNZ's competition here
BIAFW vs AWH Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while AWH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to AWH's ROE of +4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check AWH's competition here
BIAFW vs ISPC Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while ISPC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check ISPC's competition here
BIAFW vs HTGM Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while HTGM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check HTGM's competition here
BIAFW vs BIOC Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BIOC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BIOC's competition here
BIAFW vs PRENW Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 296.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while PRENW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check PRENW's competition here
BIAFW vs SQLLW Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 159.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while SQLLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of +6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is less volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check SQLLW's competition here
BIAFW vs TTOO Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, TTOO has a market cap of 61.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while TTOO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTOO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to TTOO's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to TTOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check TTOO's competition here
BIAFW vs DHR-PA Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, DHR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check DHR-PA's competition here
BIAFW vs BNGOW Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, BNGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while BNGOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to BNGOW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is less volatile compared to BNGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check BNGOW's competition here
BIAFW vs MEUSW Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, MEUSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -5.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check MEUSW's competition here
BIAFW vs OCDX Comparison February 2026
BIAFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIAFW stands at 992K. In comparison, OCDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BIAFW is priced at $0.22, while OCDX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIAFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, BIAFW's ROE is -5.46%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BIAFW is more volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIAFW.Check OCDX's competition here