Beam Global
Beam Global BEEMW Peers
See (BEEMW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEEMW | $0.10 | -33.49% | 1.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FSLR | $170.52 | +4.64% | 18.3B | 14.49 | $11.77 | N/A |
| NXT | $61.04 | +6.12% | 9B | 17.58 | $3.47 | N/A |
| ENPH | $40.97 | +0.15% | 5.4B | 37.57 | $1.09 | N/A |
| RUN | $8.99 | -0.55% | 2.1B | -0.74 | -$12.21 | N/A |
| SEDG | $23.60 | +7.96% | 1.4B | -0.77 | -$30.59 | N/A |
| ARRY | $6.96 | +4.82% | 1.1B | -3.74 | -$1.86 | N/A |
| SHLS | $5.47 | +3.89% | 912.8M | 49.64 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CSIQ | $12.45 | +11.26% | 832.5M | -36.56 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| JKS | $23.50 | +8.85% | 302.7M | -4.68 | -$5.01 | +11.68% |
Stock Comparison
BEEMW vs FSLR Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FSLR has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while FSLR trades at $170.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSLR's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FSLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to FSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs NXT Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while NXT trades at $61.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs ENPH Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ENPH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while ENPH trades at $40.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENPH's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ENPH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to ENPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs RUN Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RUN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while RUN trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUN's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to RUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to RUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SEDG Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SEDG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SEDG trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEDG's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SEDG's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SEDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs ARRY Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ARRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while ARRY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARRY's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ARRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to ARRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SHLS Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SHLS has a market cap of 912.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SHLS trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLS's P/E ratio is 49.64. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SHLS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SHLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs CSIQ Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CSIQ has a market cap of 832.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while CSIQ trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSIQ's P/E ratio is -36.56. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CSIQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to CSIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs JKS Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JKS has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while JKS trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JKS's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JKS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to JKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SPWR Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SPWR has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SPWR trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPWR's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SPWR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs ZEOWW Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ZEOWW has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while ZEOWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEOWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ZEOWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to ZEOWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs ZEO Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ZEO has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while ZEO trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEO's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ZEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to ZEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs CSLR Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CSLR has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while CSLR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLR's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CSLR's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to CSLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs TOYO Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TOYO has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while TOYO trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYO's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TOYO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to TOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SOL Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SOL has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SOL trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOL's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SOL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs TYGO Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TYGO has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while TYGO trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYGO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TYGO's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to TYGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs PN Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PN has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while PN trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PN's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs FTCI Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FTCI has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while FTCI trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTCI's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FTCI's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to FTCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs MAXN Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MAXN has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while MAXN trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MAXN's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to MAXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SMXT Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SMXT has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SMXT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMXT's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SMXT's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SMXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs VVPR Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while VVPR trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SPRU Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SPRU has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SPRU trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPRU's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SPRU's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SPRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs NOVA Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NOVA has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while NOVA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to NOVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to NOVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SPI Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SPI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SPI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SPI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SPWRW Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SPWRW has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SPWRW trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPWRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SPWRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SPWRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs BEEM Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BEEM has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while BEEM trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEEM's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BEEM's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to BEEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs PEGY Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PEGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while PEGY trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PEGY's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to PEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs TURB Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TURB has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while TURB trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TURB's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TURB's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to TURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs ASTI Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ASTI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while ASTI trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ASTI's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to ASTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs VSTE Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VSTE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while VSTE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to VSTE's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to VSTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs SUNW Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SUNW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while SUNW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SUNW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to SUNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs ISUN Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ISUN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while ISUN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ISUN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is more volatile compared to ISUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.
BEEMW vs VSTEW Comparison
BEEMW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEMW stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VSTEW has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BEEMW is priced at $0.10, while VSTEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEMW's ROE is -0.60%, compared to VSTEW's ROE of +15.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEMW is less volatile compared to VSTEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEMW.