BASF India Limited
BASF India Limited (BASF.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BASF.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BASF.NS | ₹3,574.90 | +0.69% | 154.7B | 40.92 | ₹87.34 | +0.56% |
| ASIANPAINT.BO | ₹2,420.90 | +0.81% | 2.3T | 60.38 | ₹40.22 | +1.03% |
| ASIANPAINT.NS | ₹2,426.60 | +1.07% | 2.3T | 60.37 | ₹40.22 | +1.03% |
| PIDILITIND.NS | ₹1,482.90 | +1.23% | 1.5T | 65.31 | ₹22.43 | +1.02% |
| PIDILITIND.BO | ₹1,477.80 | +0.87% | 1.5T | 65.13 | ₹22.48 | +1.02% |
| SOLARINDS.NS | ₹13,377.00 | +0.05% | 1.2T | 82.83 | ₹160.52 | +0.08% |
| SOLARINDS.BO | ₹13,353.80 | +0.09% | 1.2T | 82.75 | ₹160.47 | +0.08% |
| SRF.NS | ₹2,649.60 | -1.09% | 797.1B | 44.77 | ₹60.07 | +0.33% |
| SRF.BO | ₹2,647.30 | -1.19% | 796.8B | 44.74 | ₹60.08 | +0.33% |
| LINDEINDIA.NS | ₹6,738.50 | -0.75% | 579.4B | 98.65 | ₹68.87 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
BASF.NS vs ASIANPAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,420.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.38. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ASIANPAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,426.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 60.37. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs PIDILITIND.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,482.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs PIDILITIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,477.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.13. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs SOLARINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹13,377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs SOLARINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹13,353.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.75. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs SRF.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 797.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,649.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 44.77. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SRF.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs SRF.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 796.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,647.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SRF.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs LINDEINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 579.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹6,738.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 98.65. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs LINDEINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 578.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹6,701.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 98.19. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs BERGEPAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 531B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹464.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs BERGEPAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 530.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹464.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.08. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 375.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,492.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs HSCL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 247.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹487.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check HSCL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs HSCL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 247.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹492.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check HSCL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs ATUL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,490.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ATUL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ATUL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ATUL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs ACUTAAS.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 60.47. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ACUTAAS.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 60.36. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs DCMSHRIRAM.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,094.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs DCMSHRIRAM.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,097.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs AARTIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹442.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs AARTIIND.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹447.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs KANSAINER.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹199.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs KANSAINER.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹199.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs VINATIORGA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,508.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs VINATIORGA.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,519.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs BASF.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 154.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check BASF.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ANURAS.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 146.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 83.80. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ANURAS.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 145.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,283.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.27. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs AKZOINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 139.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹3,071.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs AKZOINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹3,087.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs FINEORG.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 137.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,642.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs FINEORG.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs AETHER.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹964.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AETHER.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs AETHER.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 59.53. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AETHER.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs SPLPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹653.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 45.58. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs PCBL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹305.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PCBL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs PCBL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹304.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PCBL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs PRIVISCL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹2,997.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs PRIVISCL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹2,990.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GRWRHITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹4,069.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GRWRHITECH.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹4,079.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs AMIORG.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs AMIORG.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs JUBLINGREA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹607.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs SHAILY.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹2,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 58.93. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,512.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.07. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,514.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs CLEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹727.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs CLEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹728.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -114.01. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹897.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 133.30. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GALAXYSURF.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,944.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GALAXYSURF.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,954.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs KINGFA.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹4,037.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs KINGFA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹4,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GULFOILLUB.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹1,077.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GULFOILLUB.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹1,076.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs RESPONIND.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹181.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs RESPONIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹182.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹952.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹951.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs TANFACIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹4,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 57.19. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs LXCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹135.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs LXCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹136.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs POCL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,144.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check POCL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs POCL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,143.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check POCL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs BALAMINES.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,080.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs BALAMINES.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,076.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs ADVENZYMES.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹314.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs NEOGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,350.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 178.89. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs NEOGEN.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,353.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 178.56. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs ADVENZYMES.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹315.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs VISHNU.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs VISHNU.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹513.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GRAUWEIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹68.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs GRAUWEIL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs DDEVPLSTIK.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while DDEVPLSTIK.BO trades at ₹279.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs DDEVPLSTIK.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while DDEVPLSTIK.NS trades at ₹281.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.NS's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹259.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.24. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs ROSSARI.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs ROSSARI.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs JUBLCPL.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,870.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs JUBLCPL.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,844.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs TATVA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 85.12. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check TATVA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs TATVA.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,219.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 85.07. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check TATVA.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs KIRIINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while KIRIINDUS.BO trades at ₹455.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas KIRIINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRIINDUS.BO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check KIRIINDUS.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs CAMLINFINE.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while CAMLINFINE.BO trades at ₹142.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas CAMLINFINE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAMLINFINE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check CAMLINFINE.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs KIRIINDUS.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while KIRIINDUS.NS trades at ₹456.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas KIRIINDUS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRIINDUS.NS's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check KIRIINDUS.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs CAMLINFINE.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while CAMLINFINE.NS trades at ₹143.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas CAMLINFINE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAMLINFINE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check CAMLINFINE.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs SIRCA.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹469.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs SIRCA.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹468.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to SIRCA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check SIRCA.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs FISCHER.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, FISCHER.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while FISCHER.BO trades at ₹40.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas FISCHER.BO's P/E ratio is 67.49. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FISCHER.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to FISCHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check FISCHER.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs POLYPLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹814.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs POLYPLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs JUBLINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while JUBLINDS.NS trades at ₹1,633.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas JUBLINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLINDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check JUBLINDS.NS's competition here
BASF.NS vs JUBLINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while JUBLINDS.BO trades at ₹1,623.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas JUBLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.31. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check JUBLINDS.BO's competition here
BASF.NS vs PREMEXPLN.NS Comparison February 2026
BASF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASF.NS stands at 154.7B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASF.NS is priced at ₹3,574.90, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹471.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 40.92, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 58.74. In terms of profitability, BASF.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASF.NS is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASF.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here