Julius Bär Gruppe AG
Julius Bär Gruppe AG BAER.SW Peers
See (BAER.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAER.SW | CHF 53.64 | +0.00% | 10.9B | 10.74 | CHF 4.97 | +4.87% |
| PGHN.SW | CHF 1,035.00 | +0.00% | 26.8B | 24.02 | CHF 43.05 | +4.06% |
| LYSPH.SW | CHF 235.60 | +0.00% | 17.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.25% |
| EQCH.SW | CHF 372.45 | +0.00% | 11.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IMEA.SW | CHF 80.00 | +0.00% | 10.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XD9C.SW | CHF 140.44 | +0.00% | 8.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZN.SW | CHF 173.60 | +0.00% | 6.7B | 30.71 | CHF 5.51 | +1.61% |
| AWESGS.SW | CHF 17.84 | +0.02% | 6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EMUCHF.SW | CHF 23.52 | +0.00% | 5.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VHYL.SW | CHF 58.89 | +0.00% | 5.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.26% |
Stock Comparison
BAER.SW vs PGHN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PGHN.SW has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while PGHN.SW trades at CHF 1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PGHN.SW's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PGHN.SW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to PGHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs LYSPH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, LYSPH.SW has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while LYSPH.SW trades at CHF 235.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LYSPH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYSPH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to LYSPH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs EQCH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EQCH.SW has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while EQCH.SW trades at CHF 372.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EQCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to EQCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IMEA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IMEA.SW has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IMEA.SW trades at CHF 80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IMEA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMEA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IMEA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XD9C.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XD9C.SW has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XD9C.SW trades at CHF 140.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XD9C.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XD9C.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to XD9C.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs VZN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, VZN.SW has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while VZN.SW trades at CHF 173.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VZN.SW's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VZN.SW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to VZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs AWESGS.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AWESGS.SW has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while AWESGS.SW trades at CHF 17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AWESGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AWESGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to AWESGS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs EMUCHF.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EMUCHF.SW has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while EMUCHF.SW trades at CHF 23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EMUCHF.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMUCHF.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to EMUCHF.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs VHYL.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, VHYL.SW has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while VHYL.SW trades at CHF 58.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VHYL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VHYL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to VHYL.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs WSRUS.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, WSRUS.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while WSRUS.SW trades at CHF 28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WSRUS.SW's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSRUS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to WSRUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSSX5E.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSSX5E.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSSX5E.SW trades at CHF 202.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSSX5E.SW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSX5E.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSSX5E.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CHDVD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CHDVD.SW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CHDVD.SW trades at CHF 164.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CHDVD.SW's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHDVD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CHDVD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CHSPI.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CHSPI.SW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CHSPI.SW trades at CHF 145.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CHSPI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHSPI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CHSPI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs VONN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, VONN.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while VONN.SW trades at CHF 64.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VONN.SW's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VONN.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to VONN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs MSEC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MSEC.SW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while MSEC.SW trades at CHF 177.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MSEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to MSEC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XMCJ.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XMCJ.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XMCJ.SW trades at CHF 27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XMCJ.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMCJ.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to XMCJ.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs VJPN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, VJPN.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while VJPN.SW trades at CHF 31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VJPN.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VJPN.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to VJPN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SMICHA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SMICHA.SW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SMICHA.SW trades at CHF 122.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SMICHA.SW's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMICHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SMICHA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IBGX.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IBGX.SW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IBGX.SW trades at CHF 151.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IBGX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBGX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IBGX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XDUE.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XDUE.SW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XDUE.SW trades at CHF 24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XDUE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDUE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to XDUE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSSMI.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSSMI.SW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSSMI.SW trades at CHF 124.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSSMI.SW's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSMI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSSMI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XSMC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XSMC.SW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XSMC.SW trades at CHF 148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XSMC.SW's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XSMC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to XSMC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs AUCHAH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AUCHAH.SW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while AUCHAH.SW trades at CHF 111.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AUCHAH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUCHAH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to AUCHAH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IMBA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IMBA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IMBA.SW trades at CHF 4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IMBA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMBA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IMBA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs FWRA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FWRA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while FWRA.SW trades at CHF 5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FWRA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWRA.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to FWRA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs EMDA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EMDA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while EMDA.SW trades at CHF 26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EMDA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMDA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to EMDA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SHIR.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SHIR.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SHIR.SW trades at CHF 4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SHIR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHIR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SHIR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SRECHA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SRECHA.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SRECHA.SW trades at CHF 10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SRECHA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRECHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SRECHA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XDPC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XDPC.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XDPC.SW trades at CHF 57.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XDPC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to XDPC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IWDC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IWDC.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IWDC.SW trades at CHF 79.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IWDC.SW's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IWDC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs DAXD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, DAXD.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while DAXD.SW trades at CHF 83.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DAXD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAXD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to DAXD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs HBMN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, HBMN.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while HBMN.SW trades at CHF 171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas HBMN.SW's P/E ratio is 59.58. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBMN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to HBMN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSSMIM.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSSMIM.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSSMIM.SW trades at CHF 295.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSSMIM.SW's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSMIM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSSMIM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IUKD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IUKD.SW has a market cap of 987.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IUKD.SW trades at CHF 9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IUKD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IUKD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IUKD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IDVY.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IDVY.SW has a market cap of 834.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IDVY.SW trades at CHF 20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IDVY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IDVY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IDVY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs FGQD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FGQD.SW has a market cap of 686M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while FGQD.SW trades at CHF 9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FGQD.SW's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGQD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to FGQD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ASOL.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ASOL.SW has a market cap of 661.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ASOL.SW trades at CHF 78.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ASOL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASOL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to ASOL.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSSLI.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSSLI.SW has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSSLI.SW trades at CHF 209.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSSLI.SW's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSLI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSSLI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IUSC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IUSC.SW has a market cap of 628.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IUSC.SW trades at CHF 93.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IUSC.SW's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IUSC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IUSC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs STNX.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, STNX.SW has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while STNX.SW trades at CHF 177.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas STNX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STNX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to STNX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs MLP.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MLP.SW has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while MLP.SW trades at CHF 5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MLP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLP.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to MLP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XUHY.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XUHY.SW has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XUHY.SW trades at CHF 10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XUHY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XUHY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to XUHY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSBGC0.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSBGC0.SW has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSBGC0.SW trades at CHF 104.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSBGC0.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSBGC0.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC0.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSGLDC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSGLDC.SW has a market cap of 482.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSGLDC.SW trades at CHF 215.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSGLDC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSGLDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSGLDC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs STZX.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, STZX.SW has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while STZX.SW trades at CHF 106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas STZX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STZX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to STZX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs XDCH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, XDCH.SW has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while XDCH.SW trades at CHF 24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XDCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XDCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to XDCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ID25.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ID25.SW has a market cap of 390M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ID25.SW trades at CHF 110.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ID25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ID25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to ID25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CMES.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CMES.SW has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CMES.SW trades at CHF 4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CMES.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMES.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CMES.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs DXJD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, DXJD.SW has a market cap of 370.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while DXJD.SW trades at CHF 40.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DXJD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DXJD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to DXJD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs LEON.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, LEON.SW has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while LEON.SW trades at CHF 19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LEON.SW's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEON.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to LEON.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs COMS.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, COMS.SW has a market cap of 295.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while COMS.SW trades at CHF 12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas COMS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COMS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to COMS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs USCHWH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, USCHWH.SW has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while USCHWH.SW trades at CHF 44.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas USCHWH.SW's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USCHWH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to USCHWH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SMOR.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SMOR.SW has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SMOR.SW trades at CHF 95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SMOR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMOR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SMOR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSBGC3.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSBGC3.SW has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSBGC3.SW trades at CHF 64.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSBGC3.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSBGC3.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC3.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs LQCE.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, LQCE.SW has a market cap of 205.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while LQCE.SW trades at CHF 4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LQCE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LQCE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to LQCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs AETH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AETH.SW has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while AETH.SW trades at CHF 21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AETH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AETH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to AETH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs MVEC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MVEC.SW has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while MVEC.SW trades at CHF 6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MVEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to MVEC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs PEHN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, PEHN.SW has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while PEHN.SW trades at CHF 70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PEHN.SW's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEHN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to PEHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs STUX.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, STUX.SW has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while STUX.SW trades at CHF 189.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas STUX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STUX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to STUX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IJPC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IJPC.SW has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IJPC.SW trades at CHF 96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IJPC.SW's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IJPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IJPC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs GHYC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, GHYC.SW has a market cap of 156.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while GHYC.SW trades at CHF 71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GHYC.SW's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHYC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to GHYC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs EMUC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EMUC.SW has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while EMUC.SW trades at CHF 8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EMUC.SW's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to EMUC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs BBN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, BBN.SW has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while BBN.SW trades at CHF 7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BBN.SW's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to BBN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs GAM.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, GAM.SW has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while GAM.SW trades at CHF 0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GAM.SW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAM.SW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to GAM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SPCE.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SPCE.SW has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SPCE.SW trades at CHF 16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SPCE.SW's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPCE.SW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SPCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ZPAL.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ZPAL.SW has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ZPAL.SW trades at CHF 260.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ZPAL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZPAL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to ZPAL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ETHW.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ETHW.SW has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ETHW.SW trades at CHF 19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ETHW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETHW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to ETHW.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SCWS.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SCWS.SW has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SCWS.SW trades at CHF 6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SCWS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCWS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SCWS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IT25.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IT25.SW has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IT25.SW trades at CHF 109.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IT25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IT25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IT25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ALPN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ALPN.SW has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ALPN.SW trades at CHF 7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ALPN.SW's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALPN.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to ALPN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs AADA.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AADA.SW has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while AADA.SW trades at CHF 8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AADA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AADA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to AADA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs NBEN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NBEN.SW has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while NBEN.SW trades at CHF 6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NBEN.SW's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBEN.SW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to NBEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs LQDH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, LQDH.SW has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while LQDH.SW trades at CHF 82.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas LQDH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LQDH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to LQDH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs INGS.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, INGS.SW has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while INGS.SW trades at CHF 150.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas INGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to INGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs MVSH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, MVSH.SW has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while MVSH.SW trades at CHF 7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MVSH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVSH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to MVSH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs FOOD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FOOD.SW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while FOOD.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FOOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to FOOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CPEN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CPEN.SW has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CPEN.SW trades at CHF 3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CPEN.SW's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPEN.SW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CPEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs FIND.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FIND.SW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while FIND.SW trades at CHF 156.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FIND.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FIND.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to FIND.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs HODLX.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, HODLX.SW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while HODLX.SW trades at CHF 24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas HODLX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HODLX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to HODLX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs IEUC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, IEUC.SW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while IEUC.SW trades at CHF 5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IEUC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to IEUC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ADOT.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ADOT.SW has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ADOT.SW trades at CHF 1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ADOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADOT.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to ADOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ABNB.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ABNB.SW has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ABNB.SW trades at CHF 44.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ABNB.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABNB.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to ABNB.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs RUS.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, RUS.SW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while RUS.SW trades at CHF 5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RUS.SW's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUS.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to RUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs AVAX.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AVAX.SW has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while AVAX.SW trades at CHF 2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AVAX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVAX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to AVAX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ABCH.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ABCH.SW has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ABCH.SW trades at CHF 20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ABCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to ABCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs SBTC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, SBTC.SW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while SBTC.SW trades at CHF 0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBTC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to SBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs DMFC.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, DMFC.SW has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while DMFC.SW trades at CHF 8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DMFC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMFC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to DMFC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs ADAW.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, ADAW.SW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while ADAW.SW trades at CHF 5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ADAW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADAW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to ADAW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs EEII.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, EEII.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while EEII.SW trades at CHF 2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EEII.SW's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEII.SW's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to EEII.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs DOTW.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, DOTW.SW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while DOTW.SW trades at CHF 1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DOTW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOTW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to DOTW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs 0P00015M0N.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, 0P00015M0N.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while 0P00015M0N.SW trades at CHF 130.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas 0P00015M0N.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0P00015M0N.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to 0P00015M0N.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs INSU.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, INSU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while INSU.SW trades at CHF 73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas INSU.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INSU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to INSU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CSEMU.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CSEMU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CSEMU.SW trades at CHF 157.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSEMU.SW's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSEMU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to CSEMU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs AUTD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, AUTD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while AUTD.SW trades at CHF 101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AUTD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUTD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to AUTD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs CASN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, CASN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while CASN.SW trades at CHF 1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CASN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CASN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is less volatile compared to CASN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs FFI.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, FFI.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while FFI.SW trades at CHF 26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FFI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to FFI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs TNOD.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, TNOD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while TNOD.SW trades at CHF 123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TNOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to TNOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.
BAER.SW vs NEWN.SW Comparison
BAER.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAER.SW stands at 10.9B. In comparison, NEWN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAER.SW is priced at CHF 53.64, while NEWN.SW trades at CHF 0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAER.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NEWN.SW's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, BAER.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWN.SW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BAER.SW is more volatile compared to NEWN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAER.SW.