HBM Healthcare Investments AG (HBMN.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HBMN.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBMN.SW | CHF 231.00 | -2.53% | 1.5B | 5.67 | CHF 40.74 | +3.90% |
| BLK.SW | CHF 695.45 | +0.00% | 149.2B | 18.09 | CHF 38.45 | +2.50% |
| PGHN.SW | CHF 681.00 | -2.66% | 17.6B | 14.06 | CHF 48.44 | +6.75% |
| BAER.SW | CHF 65.48 | -1.36% | 13.4B | 17.65 | CHF 3.71 | +3.97% |
| SUWU.SW | CHF 8.49 | +0.07% | 9.9B | 24.84 | CHF 0.34 | +1.30% |
| VZN.SW | CHF 150.60 | +0.94% | 5.9B | 25.27 | CHF 5.96 | +1.96% |
| CHSPI.SW | CHF 165.80 | +0.13% | 5.3B | 22.54 | CHF 7.36 | +2.34% |
| EFGN.SW | CHF 16.76 | +0.12% | 5B | 17.10 | CHF 0.98 | +3.88% |
| CSSX5E.SW | CHF 202.90 | +1.22% | 4.6B | 17.27 | CHF 11.75 | N/A |
| VONN.SW | CHF 71.80 | +0.28% | 4B | 14.65 | CHF 4.90 | +4.18% |
Stock Comparison
HBMN.SW vs BLK.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLK.SW has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while BLK.SW trades at CHF 695.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas BLK.SW's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLK.SW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to BLK.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check BLK.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs PGHN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PGHN.SW has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while PGHN.SW trades at CHF 681.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas PGHN.SW's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PGHN.SW's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is less volatile compared to PGHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check PGHN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs BAER.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BAER.SW has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while BAER.SW trades at CHF 65.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas BAER.SW's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAER.SW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to BAER.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check BAER.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SUWU.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUWU.SW has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SUWU.SW trades at CHF 8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SUWU.SW's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUWU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SUWU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SUWU.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs VZN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VZN.SW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while VZN.SW trades at CHF 150.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas VZN.SW's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VZN.SW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to VZN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check VZN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CHSPI.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHSPI.SW has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CHSPI.SW trades at CHF 165.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CHSPI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHSPI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CHSPI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CHSPI.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EFGN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EFGN.SW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EFGN.SW trades at CHF 16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EFGN.SW's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EFGN.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EFGN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EFGN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSSX5E.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSSX5E.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSSX5E.SW trades at CHF 202.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSSX5E.SW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSX5E.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSSX5E.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSSX5E.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs VONN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VONN.SW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while VONN.SW trades at CHF 71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas VONN.SW's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VONN.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to VONN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check VONN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SMICHA.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMICHA.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SMICHA.SW trades at CHF 141.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SMICHA.SW's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMICHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SMICHA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SMICHA.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs IWDE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IWDE.SW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while IWDE.SW trades at CHF 76.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas IWDE.SW's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWDE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to IWDE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check IWDE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSUKX.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSUKX.SW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSUKX.SW trades at CHF 211.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSUKX.SW's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSUKX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSUKX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSUKX.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CHIP.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHIP.SW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CHIP.SW trades at CHF 141.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CHIP.SW's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHIP.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CHIP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CHIP.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSSMI.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSSMI.SW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSSMI.SW trades at CHF 143.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSSMI.SW's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSMI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSSMI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSSMI.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs AUCHAH.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AUCHAH.SW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while AUCHAH.SW trades at CHF 134.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas AUCHAH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUCHAH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to AUCHAH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check AUCHAH.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs JREE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JREE.SW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while JREE.SW trades at CHF 38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas JREE.SW's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JREE.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to JREE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check JREE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSINDU.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSINDU.SW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSINDU.SW trades at CHF 627.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSINDU.SW's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSINDU.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSINDU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSINDU.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SRECHA.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SRECHA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SRECHA.SW trades at CHF 10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SRECHA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRECHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SRECHA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SRECHA.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSGOLD.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSGOLD.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSGOLD.SW trades at CHF 396.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSGOLD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSGOLD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSGOLD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSGOLD.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs IWDP.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IWDP.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while IWDP.SW trades at CHF 25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas IWDP.SW's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWDP.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to IWDP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check IWDP.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EMDA.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMDA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EMDA.SW trades at CHF 28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EMDA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMDA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EMDA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EMDA.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs DAXD.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DAXD.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while DAXD.SW trades at CHF 83.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas DAXD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAXD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to DAXD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check DAXD.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSSMIM.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSSMIM.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSSMIM.SW trades at CHF 327.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSSMIM.SW's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSMIM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSSMIM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSSMIM.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CRPH.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRPH.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CRPH.SW trades at CHF 86.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CRPH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRPH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CRPH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CRPH.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSCA.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSCA.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSCA.SW trades at CHF 240.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSCA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSCA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSCA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSCA.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs X1G.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, X1G.SW has a market cap of 832.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while X1G.SW trades at CHF 221.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas X1G.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to X1G.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to X1G.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check X1G.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs IJPE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IJPE.SW has a market cap of 728.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while IJPE.SW trades at CHF 81.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas IJPE.SW's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IJPE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to IJPE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check IJPE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSSLI.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSSLI.SW has a market cap of 708.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSSLI.SW trades at CHF 236.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSSLI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSSLI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSSLI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSSLI.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSGLDC.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSGLDC.SW has a market cap of 590.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSGLDC.SW trades at CHF 259.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSGLDC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSGLDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSGLDC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSGLDC.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs MLP.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MLP.SW has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while MLP.SW trades at CHF 5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas MLP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLP.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to MLP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check MLP.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CBUS.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CBUS.SW has a market cap of 554.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CBUS.SW trades at CHF 14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CBUS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBUS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CBUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CBUS.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs WPAB.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WPAB.SW has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while WPAB.SW trades at CHF 7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas WPAB.SW's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPAB.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to WPAB.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check WPAB.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs FLES.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLES.SW has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while FLES.SW trades at CHF 25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas FLES.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLES.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to FLES.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check FLES.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CISB.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CISB.SW has a market cap of 485.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CISB.SW trades at CHF 10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CISB.SW's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CISB.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CISB.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CISB.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs E20Y.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, E20Y.SW has a market cap of 460M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while E20Y.SW trades at CHF 3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas E20Y.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to E20Y.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to E20Y.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check E20Y.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CE8USD.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CE8USD.SW has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CE8USD.SW trades at CHF 453.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CE8USD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CE8USD.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CE8USD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CE8USD.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs IEBB.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IEBB.SW has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while IEBB.SW trades at CHF 4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas IEBB.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEBB.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to IEBB.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check IEBB.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs COMS.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COMS.SW has a market cap of 429M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while COMS.SW trades at CHF 16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas COMS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COMS.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to COMS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check COMS.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs ROAI.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ROAI.SW has a market cap of 348.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while ROAI.SW trades at CHF 27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas ROAI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROAI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to ROAI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check ROAI.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSGLDE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSGLDE.SW has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSGLDE.SW trades at CHF 204.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSGLDE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSGLDE.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSGLDE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSGLDE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CBTC.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CBTC.SW has a market cap of 316.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CBTC.SW trades at CHF 12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBTC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CBTC.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs COPM.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COPM.SW has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while COPM.SW trades at CHF 10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas COPM.SW's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COPM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to COPM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check COPM.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSKR.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSKR.SW has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSKR.SW trades at CHF 252.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSKR.SW's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSKR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSKR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSKR.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SMOR.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMOR.SW has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SMOR.SW trades at CHF 95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SMOR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMOR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SMOR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SMOR.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs ID25.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ID25.SW has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while ID25.SW trades at CHF 111.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas ID25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ID25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to ID25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check ID25.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs XMOV.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XMOV.SW has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while XMOV.SW trades at CHF 150.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas XMOV.SW's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMOV.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to XMOV.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check XMOV.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs BRIC.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRIC.SW has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while BRIC.SW trades at CHF 28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas BRIC.SW's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRIC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to BRIC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check BRIC.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs PEHN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PEHN.SW has a market cap of 156.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while PEHN.SW trades at CHF 64.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas PEHN.SW's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEHN.SW's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to PEHN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check PEHN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EMUM.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMUM.SW has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EMUM.SW trades at CHF 46.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EMUM.SW's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMUM.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EMUM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EMUM.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EMUL.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMUL.SW has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EMUL.SW trades at CHF 51.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EMUL.SW's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMUL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EMUL.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EMUL.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs ZPAL.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZPAL.SW has a market cap of 118.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while ZPAL.SW trades at CHF 293.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas ZPAL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZPAL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to ZPAL.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check ZPAL.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSMXCP.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSMXCP.SW has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSMXCP.SW trades at CHF 186.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSMXCP.SW's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSMXCP.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSMXCP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSMXCP.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs BBN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BBN.SW has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while BBN.SW trades at CHF 7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas BBN.SW's P/E ratio is 51.57. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to BBN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check BBN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CSUK.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSUK.SW has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CSUK.SW trades at CHF 130.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CSUK.SW's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSUK.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CSUK.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CSUK.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SPCE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPCE.SW has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SPCE.SW trades at CHF 16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SPCE.SW's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPCE.SW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SPCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SPCE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs GAM.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GAM.SW has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while GAM.SW trades at CHF 0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas GAM.SW's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAM.SW's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is less volatile compared to GAM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check GAM.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs ALPN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALPN.SW has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while ALPN.SW trades at CHF 9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas ALPN.SW's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALPN.SW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to ALPN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check ALPN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs RARE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RARE.SW has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while RARE.SW trades at CHF 58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas RARE.SW's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RARE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to RARE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check RARE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs IT25.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IT25.SW has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while IT25.SW trades at CHF 111.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas IT25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IT25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to IT25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check IT25.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs NBEN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NBEN.SW has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while NBEN.SW trades at CHF 6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas NBEN.SW's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBEN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to NBEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check NBEN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs INGS.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INGS.SW has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while INGS.SW trades at CHF 150.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas INGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is less volatile compared to INGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check INGS.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs FOOD.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FOOD.SW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while FOOD.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas FOOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to FOOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check FOOD.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CPEN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPEN.SW has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CPEN.SW trades at CHF 2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CPEN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPEN.SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CPEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CPEN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs JE13.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JE13.SW has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while JE13.SW trades at CHF 97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas JE13.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JE13.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to JE13.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check JE13.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs LYLTM.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYLTM.SW has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while LYLTM.SW trades at CHF 32.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas LYLTM.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYLTM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to LYLTM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check LYLTM.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs FIND.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FIND.SW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while FIND.SW trades at CHF 156.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas FIND.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FIND.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is less volatile compared to FIND.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check FIND.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EB3M.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EB3M.SW has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EB3M.SW trades at CHF 4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EB3M.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EB3M.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EB3M.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EB3M.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs TINC.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TINC.SW has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while TINC.SW trades at CHF 98.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas TINC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TINC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to TINC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check TINC.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs RUS.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUS.SW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while RUS.SW trades at CHF 5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas RUS.SW's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUS.SW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to RUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check RUS.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EFIE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EFIE.SW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EFIE.SW trades at CHF 171.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EFIE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EFIE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EFIE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EFIE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EUFM.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EUFM.SW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EUFM.SW trades at CHF 12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EUFM.SW's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUFM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EUFM.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EUFM.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SBTC.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBTC.SW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SBTC.SW trades at CHF 0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBTC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SBTC.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs ADOT.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADOT.SW has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while ADOT.SW trades at CHF 0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas ADOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADOT.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to ADOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check ADOT.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs EEII.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EEII.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while EEII.SW trades at CHF 2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas EEII.SW's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEII.SW's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to EEII.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check EEII.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs FLEQ.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLEQ.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while FLEQ.SW trades at CHF 33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas FLEQ.SW's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLEQ.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to FLEQ.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check FLEQ.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs ES50.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ES50.SW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while ES50.SW trades at CHF 5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas ES50.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ES50.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to ES50.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check ES50.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs DOTW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOTW.SW has a market cap of 646.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while DOTW.SW trades at CHF 0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas DOTW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOTW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to DOTW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check DOTW.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs VPOL.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VPOL.SW has a market cap of 569.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while VPOL.SW trades at CHF 0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas VPOL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VPOL.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to VPOL.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check VPOL.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SDOT.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SDOT.SW has a market cap of 116.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SDOT.SW trades at CHF 0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SDOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDOT.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SDOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SDOT.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs XAT1.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XAT1.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while XAT1.SW trades at CHF 15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas XAT1.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XAT1.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to XAT1.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check XAT1.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CE9USD.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CE9USD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CE9USD.SW trades at CHF 245.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CE9USD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CE9USD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to CE9USD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CE9USD.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs SESW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SESW.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while SESW.SW trades at CHF 6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas SESW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SESW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to SESW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check SESW.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs MVWE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MVWE.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while MVWE.SW trades at CHF 5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas MVWE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVWE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to MVWE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check MVWE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs COGO.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COGO.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while COGO.SW trades at CHF 83.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas COGO.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COGO.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to COGO.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check COGO.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs LYCOSW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYCOSW.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while LYCOSW.SW trades at CHF 435.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas LYCOSW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYCOSW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to LYCOSW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check LYCOSW.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs LYUTLW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYUTLW.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while LYUTLW.SW trades at CHF 301.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas LYUTLW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYUTLW.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to LYUTLW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check LYUTLW.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs DXJP.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DXJP.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while DXJP.SW trades at CHF 17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas DXJP.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DXJP.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to DXJP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check DXJP.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs LYTELW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYTELW.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while LYTELW.SW trades at CHF 157.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas LYTELW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYTELW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to LYTELW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check LYTELW.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs VLUU.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLUU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while VLUU.SW trades at CHF 189.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas VLUU.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLUU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to VLUU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check VLUU.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs UTIT.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UTIT.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while UTIT.SW trades at CHF 94.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas UTIT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTIT.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to UTIT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check UTIT.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs 0P00015M0N.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0P00015M0N.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while 0P00015M0N.SW trades at CHF 192.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas 0P00015M0N.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0P00015M0N.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to 0P00015M0N.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check 0P00015M0N.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs MDBE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MDBE.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while MDBE.SW trades at CHF 9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas MDBE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDBE.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to MDBE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check MDBE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs CASN.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CASN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while CASN.SW trades at CHF 1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas CASN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CASN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is less volatile compared to CASN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check CASN.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs FFI.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFI.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while FFI.SW trades at CHF 26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas FFI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to FFI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check FFI.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs TNOD.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNOD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while TNOD.SW trades at CHF 123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas TNOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to TNOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check TNOD.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs HEDP.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEDP.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while HEDP.SW trades at CHF 12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas HEDP.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEDP.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to HEDP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check HEDP.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs GISE.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GISE.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while GISE.SW trades at CHF 10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas GISE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GISE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to GISE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check GISE.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs LYCODW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYCODW.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while LYCODW.SW trades at CHF 478.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas LYCODW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYCODW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to LYCODW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check LYCODW.SW's competition here
HBMN.SW vs LYMATW.SW Comparison June 2026
HBMN.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBMN.SW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYMATW.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBMN.SW is priced at CHF 231.00, while LYMATW.SW trades at CHF 516.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBMN.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 5.67, whereas LYMATW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBMN.SW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYMATW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBMN.SW is more volatile compared to LYMATW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBMN.SW.Check LYMATW.SW's competition here