IMAC Holdings, Inc.
IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BACK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BACK | $0.06 | -3.45% | 212K | -0.02 | -$2.98 | N/A |
| HCA | $502.05 | -1.53% | 112.2B | 17.70 | $28.35 | +0.59% |
| THC | $203.21 | -3.98% | 17.9B | 13.12 | $15.48 | N/A |
| FMS | $22.41 | -3.24% | 12.9B | 11.61 | $1.93 | +3.50% |
| UHS | $189.58 | -2.01% | 12.1B | 8.20 | $23.10 | +0.42% |
| ENSG | $204.96 | -2.58% | 11.9B | 35.16 | $5.83 | +0.12% |
| SOLV | $67.10 | -2.29% | 11.6B | 7.56 | $8.88 | N/A |
| EHC | $99.68 | -1.86% | 10B | 17.77 | $5.61 | +0.72% |
| DVA | $148.83 | -0.77% | 10B | 15.64 | $9.52 | N/A |
| OSH | $39.00 | +0.08% | 9.5B | -17.65 | -$2.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BACK vs HCA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, HCA has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while HCA trades at $502.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HCA's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to HCA's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to HCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check HCA's competition here
BACK vs THC Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, THC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while THC trades at $203.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas THC's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to THC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to THC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check THC's competition here
BACK vs FMS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, FMS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while FMS trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FMS's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to FMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check FMS's competition here
BACK vs UHS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, UHS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while UHS trades at $189.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UHS's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to UHS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to UHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check UHS's competition here
BACK vs ENSG Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ENSG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ENSG trades at $204.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENSG's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ENSG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ENSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ENSG's competition here
BACK vs SOLV Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SOLV has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SOLV trades at $67.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SOLV's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SOLV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SOLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SOLV's competition here
BACK vs EHC Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, EHC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while EHC trades at $99.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EHC's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to EHC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to EHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check EHC's competition here
BACK vs DVA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, DVA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while DVA trades at $148.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DVA's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DVA's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to DVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check DVA's competition here
BACK vs OSH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, OSH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while OSH trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OSH's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to OSH's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to OSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check OSH's competition here
BACK vs CHE Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CHE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CHE trades at $383.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHE's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CHE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CHE's competition here
BACK vs LHCG Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, LHCG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while LHCG trades at $169.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LHCG's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to LHCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to LHCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check LHCG's competition here
BACK vs MMED Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, MMED has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while MMED trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MMED's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MMED's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to MMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check MMED's competition here
BACK vs OPCH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, OPCH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while OPCH trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPCH's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to OPCH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to OPCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check OPCH's competition here
BACK vs BKD Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, BKD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while BKD trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BKD's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BKD's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to BKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check BKD's competition here
BACK vs AMED Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AMED trades at $100.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMED's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AMED's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AMED's competition here
BACK vs LFST Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, LFST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while LFST trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LFST's P/E ratio is 320.50. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to LFST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to LFST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check LFST's competition here
BACK vs NHC Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, NHC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while NHC trades at $157.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NHC's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to NHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check NHC's competition here
BACK vs ACHC Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ACHC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ACHC trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACHC's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ACHC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ACHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ACHC's competition here
BACK vs SEM Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SEM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SEM trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SEM's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SEM's competition here
BACK vs ADUS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ADUS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ADUS trades at $101.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADUS's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ADUS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ADUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ADUS's competition here
BACK vs AMEH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AMEH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AMEH trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMEH's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AMEH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AMEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AMEH's competition here
BACK vs MD Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, MD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while MD trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MD's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to MD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check MD's competition here
BACK vs SGRY Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SGRY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SGRY trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGRY's P/E ratio is -20.26. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SGRY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SGRY's competition here
BACK vs AVAH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AVAH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AVAH trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVAH's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AVAH's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AVAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AVAH's competition here
BACK vs HCSG Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, HCSG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while HCSG trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HCSG's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to HCSG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to HCSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check HCSG's competition here
BACK vs ARDT Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ARDT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ARDT trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ARDT's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ARDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ARDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ARDT's competition here
BACK vs BKDT Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, BKDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while BKDT trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BKDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BKDT's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to BKDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check BKDT's competition here
BACK vs ASTH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ASTH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ASTH trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASTH's P/E ratio is 53.24. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ASTH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ASTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ASTH's competition here
BACK vs PNTG Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, PNTG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while PNTG trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PNTG's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PNTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to PNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check PNTG's competition here
BACK vs USPH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, USPH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while USPH trades at $75.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USPH's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to USPH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to USPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check USPH's competition here
BACK vs INNV Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, INNV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while INNV trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INNV's P/E ratio is 164.80. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to INNV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to INNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check INNV's competition here
BACK vs TALK Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TALK has a market cap of 857.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TALK trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TALK's P/E ratio is 128.25. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TALK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to TALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TALK's competition here
BACK vs FSHCX Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, FSHCX has a market cap of 811.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while FSHCX trades at $94.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FSHCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to FSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check FSHCX's competition here
BACK vs AMN Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AMN has a market cap of 692.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AMN trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMN's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AMN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AMN's competition here
BACK vs EHAB Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, EHAB has a market cap of 689.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while EHAB trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EHAB's P/E ratio is -151.11. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to EHAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to EHAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check EHAB's competition here
BACK vs SNDA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SNDA has a market cap of 650.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SNDA trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNDA's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SNDA's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SNDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SNDA's competition here
BACK vs CMPS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CMPS has a market cap of 564.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CMPS trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMPS's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CMPS's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CMPS's competition here
BACK vs MCTA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, MCTA has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while MCTA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCTA's P/E ratio is 419.36. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MCTA's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to MCTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check MCTA's competition here
BACK vs CYH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CYH has a market cap of 422.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CYH trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CYH's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CYH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CYH's competition here
BACK vs AUNA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AUNA has a market cap of 417.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AUNA trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AUNA's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AUNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AUNA's competition here
BACK vs TOI Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TOI has a market cap of 354.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TOI trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOI's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TOI's ROE of +7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to TOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TOI's competition here
BACK vs AONC Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AONC has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AONC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AONC's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AONC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AONC's competition here
BACK vs CCRN Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CCRN has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CCRN trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCRN's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CCRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CCRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CCRN's competition here
BACK vs AGL Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AGL has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AGL trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AGL's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AGL's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AGL's competition here
BACK vs CSU Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CSU has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CSU trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CSU's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CSU's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CSU's competition here
BACK vs AIRS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AIRS has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AIRS trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIRS's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AIRS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AIRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AIRS's competition here
BACK vs JYNT Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, JYNT has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while JYNT trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JYNT's P/E ratio is -418.50. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to JYNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to JYNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check JYNT's competition here
BACK vs NAKAW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, NAKAW has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while NAKAW trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NAKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NAKAW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to NAKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check NAKAW's competition here
BACK vs FVE Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, FVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while FVE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FVE's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to FVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check FVE's competition here
BACK vs KDLYW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, KDLYW has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while KDLYW trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KDLYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to KDLYW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to KDLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check KDLYW's competition here
BACK vs DCGO Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, DCGO has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while DCGO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DCGO's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DCGO's ROE of -5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to DCGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check DCGO's competition here
BACK vs BTMD Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, BTMD has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while BTMD trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTMD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BTMD's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to BTMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check BTMD's competition here
BACK vs ALR Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ALR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ALR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ALR's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ALR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ALR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ALR's competition here
BACK vs IMAC Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, IMAC has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while IMAC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMAC's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to IMAC's ROE of +1183.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to IMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check IMAC's competition here
BACK vs CCEL Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CCEL has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CCEL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCEL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CCEL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CCEL's competition here
BACK vs AIH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AIH trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIH's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AIH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to AIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AIH's competition here
BACK vs AMS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, AMS has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while AMS trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMS's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AMS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to AMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check AMS's competition here
BACK vs CANO Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CANO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CANO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CANO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CANO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CANO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CANO's competition here
BACK vs FTRP Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, FTRP has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while FTRP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FTRP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FTRP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to FTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check FTRP's competition here
BACK vs PIII Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, PIII has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while PIII trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PIII's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PIII's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to PIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check PIII's competition here
BACK vs MODV Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, MODV has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while MODV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MODV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MODV's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to MODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check MODV's competition here
BACK vs GBNH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, GBNH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while GBNH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GBNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GBNH's ROE of +15.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to GBNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check GBNH's competition here
BACK vs RHE-PA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, RHE-PA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while RHE-PA trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RHE-PA's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to RHE-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to RHE-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check RHE-PA's competition here
BACK vs RHE Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, RHE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while RHE trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RHE's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to RHE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to RHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check RHE's competition here
BACK vs TOIIW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TOIIW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TOIIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TOIIW's ROE of +7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to TOIIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TOIIW's competition here
BACK vs ATIP Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, ATIP has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while ATIP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATIP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ATIP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to ATIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check ATIP's competition here
BACK vs SYRA Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SYRA has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SYRA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SYRA's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SYRA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SYRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SYRA's competition here
BACK vs IMACW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, IMACW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while IMACW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to IMACW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to IMACW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check IMACW's competition here
BACK vs MNDR Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, MNDR has a market cap of 912.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while MNDR trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MNDR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MNDR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to MNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check MNDR's competition here
BACK vs TALKW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TALKW has a market cap of 835.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TALKW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TALKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TALKW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to TALKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TALKW's competition here
BACK vs CCM Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, CCM has a market cap of 531.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while CCM trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCM's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to CCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check CCM's competition here
BACK vs NVOS Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, NVOS has a market cap of 61.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while NVOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NVOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NVOS's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to NVOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check NVOS's competition here
BACK vs NIVFW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, NIVFW has a market cap of 30.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while NIVFW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NIVFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NIVFW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to NIVFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check NIVFW's competition here
BACK vs PIIIW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, PIIIW has a market cap of 21.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while PIIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PIIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PIIIW's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to PIIIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check PIIIW's competition here
BACK vs IONM Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, IONM has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while IONM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IONM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to IONM's ROE of +5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is less volatile compared to IONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check IONM's competition here
BACK vs DVCR Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, DVCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while DVCR trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DVCR's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DVCR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to DVCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check DVCR's competition here
BACK vs TVTY Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TVTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TVTY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TVTY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TVTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to TVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TVTY's competition here
BACK vs NFH Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, NFH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while NFH trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NFH's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to NFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check NFH's competition here
BACK vs TLMD Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TLMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TLMD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TLMD's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TLMD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to TLMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TLMD's competition here
BACK vs TLMDW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, TLMDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while TLMDW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TLMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TLMDW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to TLMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check TLMDW's competition here
BACK vs HNGR Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, HNGR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while HNGR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HNGR's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to HNGR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to HNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check HNGR's competition here
BACK vs SLHG Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SLHG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SLHG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLHG's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SLHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SLHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SLHG's competition here
BACK vs SLHGP Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, SLHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while SLHGP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLHGP's P/E ratio is -30.38. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SLHGP's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to SLHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check SLHGP's competition here
BACK vs DCGOW Comparison March 2026
BACK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BACK stands at 212K. In comparison, DCGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BACK is priced at $0.06, while DCGOW trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BACK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DCGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BACK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DCGOW's ROE of -5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BACK is more volatile compared to DCGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BACK.Check DCGOW's competition here