AngloGold Ashanti Plc
AngloGold Ashanti Plc AU Peers
See (AU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU | $40.44 | +1.43% | 20.36B | 18.55 | $2.18 | +2.24% |
| NEM | $49.86 | +2.47% | 55.49B | 11.36 | $4.39 | +2.02% |
| AEM | $106.49 | +1.63% | 53.83B | 28.17 | $3.78 | +1.51% |
| WPM | $78.77 | +2.97% | 35.74B | 57.92 | $1.36 | +0.80% |
| FNV | $158.97 | +2.19% | 30.62B | 49.68 | $3.20 | +0.92% |
| GOLD | $17.75 | +0.68% | 30.52B | 14.55 | $1.22 | +2.25% |
| GFI | $20.79 | +3.77% | 18.60B | 15.06 | $1.38 | +2.63% |
| KGC | $13.76 | +2.00% | 16.93B | 14.33 | $0.96 | +0.87% |
| RGLD | $169.29 | +2.21% | 11.14B | 27.98 | $6.05 | +1.01% |
| AGI | $24.56 | +3.13% | 10.33B | 40.93 | $0.60 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
AU vs NEM Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 55.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while NEM trades at $49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs AEM Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 53.83B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while AEM trades at $106.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs WPM Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 35.74B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while WPM trades at $78.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs FNV Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 30.62B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while FNV trades at $158.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GOLD Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 30.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GOLD trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GFI Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GFI trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs KGC Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 16.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while KGC trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs RGLD Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while RGLD trades at $169.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs AGI Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while AGI trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 40.93. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs HMY Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while HMY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs AUY Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs CDE Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while CDE trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs OR Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while OR trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 136.15. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs BTG Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while BTG trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs EGO Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while EGO trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs IAG Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while IAG trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs SBSW Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while SBSW trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs HL-PB Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while HL-PB trades at $50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1683.33. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs HL Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while HL trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs NGD Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while NGD trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs ORLA Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while ORLA trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs EQX Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while EQX trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs SAND Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while SAND trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 81.45. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs SSRM Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while SSRM trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs NVAWW Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while NVAWW trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs CGAU Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while CGAU trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs NG Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while NG trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs DRD Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while DRD trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs SA Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while SA trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -46.44. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs ARMN Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while ARMN trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs CNL Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 818.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while CNL trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GSS Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GAU Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 324.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GAU trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 63.01. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs DC Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 312.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while DC trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs CMCL Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 298.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while CMCL trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs ODV Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 248.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while ODV trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs NFGC Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 236.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while NFGC trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs IAUX Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 226.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while IAUX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs CTGO Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 188.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while CTGO trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs IDR Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 179.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while IDR trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GSV Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 155.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GLDG Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 148.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs THM Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 140.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while THM trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -33.69. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs USAU Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 130.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while USAU trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs VGZ Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 120.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while VGZ trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs DC-WT Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 92.76M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while DC-WT trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs TRX Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 87.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while TRX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -30.94. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs GORO Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 78.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while GORO trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs HYMC Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 74.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while HYMC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs PZG Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 32.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while PZG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs ODVWZ Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 21.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while ODVWZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs AAU Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs AUST Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 15.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while AUST trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs HYMCL Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 427216.00. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.
AU vs HYMCW Comparison
AU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AU stands at 20.36B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 34977.00. Regarding current trading prices, AU is priced at $40.44, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.55, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AU's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AU is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AU.