Atul Ltd

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,121.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 52.79. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,120.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 52.72. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,314.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,314.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 58.48. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹12,434.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 77.50. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹12,430.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 77.50. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 708.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,391.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SRF.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 707.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,388.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SRF.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 576.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹6,765.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 97.42. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 576.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹6,760.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 97.33. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 472.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹405.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 44.85. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 472.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹405.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.72. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 356.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,245.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 54.21. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 221.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹438.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check HSCL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 220.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹437.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check HSCL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 185.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,269.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 65.07. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 185.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,268.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 64.73. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 179.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,105.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ATUL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,028.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 160.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,026.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹405.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹404.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 144B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹1,085.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 66.61. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AETHER.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹1,083.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 66.65. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AETHER.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,242.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 80.67. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,241.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 80.58. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,352.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,349.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,163.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check BASF.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,162.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check BASF.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,853.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,847.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹159.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹159.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,008.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,002.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹636.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹2,853.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹2,850.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹2,210.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 64.46. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹232.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PCBL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹232.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PCBL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹564.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹3,414.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹3,412.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹676.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹676.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,239.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,239.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹759.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 112.41. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹759.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -96.42. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,567.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,561.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹3,949.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹3,947.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹870.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹868.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.NS has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JINDALPOLY.NS trades at ₹909.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JINDALPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JINDALPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JINDALPOLY.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.BO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JINDALPOLY.BO trades at ₹908.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JINDALPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -30.66. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JINDALPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JINDALPOLY.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹140.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹140.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹1,834.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.96. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹712.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹712.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,249.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 167.06. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹489.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹488.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,250.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 166.62. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,004.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,002.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹113.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹112.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 39.34. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,022.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check POCL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,021.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check POCL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹266.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹266.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, NOCIL.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while NOCIL.NS trades at ₹160.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas NOCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.04. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOCIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to NOCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check NOCIL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, NOCIL.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while NOCIL.BO trades at ₹159.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas NOCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOCIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to NOCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check NOCIL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,119.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 80.09. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check TATVA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,118.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 79.95. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check TATVA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JUBLINDS.NS trades at ₹1,633.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JUBLINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLINDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JUBLINDS.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹808.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹807.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 83.89. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JUBLINDS.BO trades at ₹1,623.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JUBLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.31. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JUBLINDS.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, TIDEWATER.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while TIDEWATER.NS trades at ₹1,479.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas TIDEWATER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIDEWATER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to TIDEWATER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check TIDEWATER.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, TIDEWATER.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while TIDEWATER.BO trades at ₹1,478.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas TIDEWATER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIDEWATER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is more volatile compared to TIDEWATER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check TIDEWATER.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹223.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.02. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,559.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,549.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹51.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹400.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹398.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to SIRCA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check SIRCA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, XPROINDIA.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while XPROINDIA.BO trades at ₹955.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas XPROINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 170.54. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPROINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to XPROINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check XPROINDIA.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, XPROINDIA.NS has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while XPROINDIA.NS trades at ₹953.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas XPROINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 169.39. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPROINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to XPROINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check XPROINDIA.NS's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while DDEVPLSTIK.BO trades at ₹216.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.BO's competition here

ATUL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATUL.NS stands at 179.7B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATUL.NS is priced at ₹6,102.50, while DDEVPLSTIK.NS trades at ₹216.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATUL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.25, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.NS's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, ATUL.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATUL.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATUL.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.NS's competition here