ETHZilla Corporation Warrant

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ONC has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while ONC trades at $365.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONC's P/E ratio is 724.28. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ONC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to ONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check ONC's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, WBA has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while WBA trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBA's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to WBA's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to WBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check WBA's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DFTX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while DFTX trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to DFTX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to DFTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check DFTX's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HROWL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while HROWL trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HROWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to HROWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check HROWL's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HROWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while HROWM trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HROWM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to HROWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check HROWM's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LFMDP has a market cap of 998.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while LFMDP trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFMDP's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LFMDP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to LFMDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check LFMDP's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CGEM has a market cap of 806.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while CGEM trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGEM's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CGEM's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to CGEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check CGEM's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ATAI has a market cap of 731.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while ATAI trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAI's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ATAI's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to ATAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check ATAI's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while HITI trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to HITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check HITI's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LFMD has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while LFMD trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFMD's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LFMD's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to LFMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check LFMD's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LFLY has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while LFLY trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LFLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to LFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check LFLY's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, YI has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while YI trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YI's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to YI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to YI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check YI's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while PETS trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to PETS's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to PETS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check PETS's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RAD has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while RAD trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAD's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to RAD's ROE of +2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to RAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check RAD's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KYNB has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while KYNB trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYNB's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to KYNB's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to KYNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check KYNB's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RNTX has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while RNTX trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNTX's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to RNTX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to RNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check RNTX's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, POM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while POM trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POM's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to POM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to POM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check POM's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MSLE has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while MSLE trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSLE's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MSLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to MSLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check MSLE's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MEDS has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while MEDS trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEDS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MEDS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to MEDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check MEDS's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CJJD has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while CJJD trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJJD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CJJD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to CJJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check CJJD's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NEUP has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while NEUP trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEUP's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to NEUP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to NEUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check NEUP's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SSY has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while SSY trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to SSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check SSY's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while HKPD trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HKPD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check HKPD's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AIXC has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while AIXC trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIXC's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to AIXC's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to AIXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check AIXC's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BGMSP has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while BGMSP trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BGMSP's ROE of -7.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to BGMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check BGMSP's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MDVL has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while MDVL trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDVL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MDVL's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to MDVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check MDVL's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NVOH has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while NVOH trades at $21.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVOH's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to NVOH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to NVOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check NVOH's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BGMS has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while BGMS trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGMS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BGMS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to BGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check BGMS's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AZNH has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while AZNH trades at $53.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZNH's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to AZNH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to AZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check AZNH's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LFLYW has a market cap of 299.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while LFLYW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLYW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LFLYW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to LFLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check LFLYW's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BIMI has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while BIMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BIMI's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to BIMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check BIMI's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, POZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while POZN trades at $5.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to POZN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to POZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check POZN's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CPD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while CPD trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CPD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to CPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check CPD's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IPXL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while IPXL trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to IPXL's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to IPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check IPXL's competition here

ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ESRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.43, while ESRX trades at $92.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ESRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is more volatile compared to ESRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.Check ESRX's competition here