CannBioRx Life Sciences Corp.
CannBioRx Life Sciences Corp. ATNFW Peers
See (ATNFW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Pharmaceuticals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATNFW | $0.01 | +2.53% | 5.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| INSM | $66.36 | -2.44% | 12.1B | -11.19 | -$5.93 | N/A |
| WBA | $11.19 | -0.18% | 9.7B | -1.67 | -$6.69 | +4.47% |
| ONC | $240.41 | +0.88% | 2.1B | -65.87 | -$3.65 | N/A |
| LFMDP | $24.34 | -0.45% | 1.1B | -10.79 | -$2.26 | N/A |
| HROWM | $26.16 | -0.08% | 960.1M | N/A | N/A | +11.33% |
| HROWL | $25.20 | -0.32% | 924.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LFMD | $11.46 | -0.69% | 520.8M | -34.73 | -$0.33 | N/A |
| HITI | $2.23 | -2.19% | 180.5M | -37.17 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| PETS | $3.78 | +0.27% | 78.1M | 378.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ATNFW vs INSM Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while INSM trades at $66.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to INSM's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs WBA Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, WBA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while WBA trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBA's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to WBA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to WBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs ONC Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, ONC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while ONC trades at $240.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONC's P/E ratio is -65.87. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ONC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to ONC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs LFMDP Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, LFMDP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while LFMDP trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFMDP's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LFMDP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to LFMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs HROWM Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, HROWM has a market cap of 960.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while HROWM trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to HROWM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to HROWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs HROWL Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, HROWL has a market cap of 924.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while HROWL trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to HROWL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to HROWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs LFMD Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, LFMD has a market cap of 520.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while LFMD trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFMD's P/E ratio is -34.73. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LFMD's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to LFMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs HITI Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while HITI trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is -37.17. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to HITI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs PETS Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while PETS trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is 378.00. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PETS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to PETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs YI Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, YI has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while YI trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YI's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to YI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to YI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs RNTX Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, RNTX has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while RNTX trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNTX's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to RNTX's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to RNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs RAD Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, RAD has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while RAD trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAD's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to RAD's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to RAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs MEDS Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, MEDS has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while MEDS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEDS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to MEDS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to MEDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs NEUP Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, NEUP has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while NEUP trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEUP's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to NEUP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to NEUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs CJJD Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, CJJD has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while CJJD trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJJD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to CJJD's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to CJJD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs SSY Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, SSY has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while SSY trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSY's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to SSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs MDVL Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, MDVL has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while MDVL trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDVL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to MDVL's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to MDVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs LFLY Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, LFLY has a market cap of 489.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while LFLY trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLY's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LFLY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW and LFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ATNFW vs LFLYW Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, LFLYW has a market cap of 489.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while LFLYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLYW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LFLYW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW is less volatile compared to LFLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATNFW.
ATNFW vs BIMI Comparison
ATNFW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATNFW stands at 5.5M. In comparison, BIMI has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATNFW is priced at $0.01, while BIMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATNFW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATNFW's ROE is -1.47%, compared to BIMI's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ATNFW and BIMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).