Arrow Electronics, Inc.

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SNX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while SNX trades at $148.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas SNX's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to SNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SNX's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while NSIT trades at $145.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check NSIT's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while AVT trades at $54.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas AVT's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to AVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check AVT's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CNXN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while CNXN trades at $64.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas CNXN's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNXN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to CNXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CNXN's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SCSC has a market cap of 929.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while SCSC trades at $41.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas SCSC's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCSC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to SCSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SCSC's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SNPO has a market cap of 822.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while SNPO trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas SNPO's P/E ratio is -27.56. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SNPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SNPO's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CLMB has a market cap of 464.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while CLMB trades at $100.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas CLMB's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to CLMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CLMB's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WSTG has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while WSTG trades at $31.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas WSTG's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSTG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to WSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check WSTG's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IZM has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while IZM trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas IZM's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IZM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to IZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check IZM's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TAIT has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while TAIT trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas TAIT's P/E ratio is 220.04. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to TAIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check TAIT's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AEY has a market cap of 538.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $128.71, while AEY trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas AEY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to AEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check AEY's competition here