Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Technology Distributors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARW | $204.28 | -1.08% | 10.5B | 14.27 | $14.45 | N/A |
| SNX | $245.10 | -3.11% | 20B | 14.73 | $16.99 | +0.74% |
| AVT | $84.77 | -1.49% | 7.1B | 20.62 | $4.18 | +1.62% |
| NSIT | $117.11 | -2.22% | 3.5B | 10.69 | $10.72 | N/A |
| CNXN | $78.30 | +0.92% | 1.9B | 21.01 | $3.62 | +0.92% |
| SCSC | $54.56 | +1.25% | 1.1B | 13.96 | $3.82 | N/A |
| SNPO | $10.75 | +0.09% | 822.8M | -27.56 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| CLMB | $25.74 | +0.62% | 466.4M | 7.67 | $3.27 | +0.34% |
| INHD | $39.49 | +0.00% | 178.5M | -0.51 | -$76.80 | N/A |
| WSTG | $31.11 | +1.04% | 139.3M | 12.11 | $2.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARW vs SNX Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SNX has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while SNX trades at $245.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SNX's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SNX's competition here
ARW vs AVT Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVT has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while AVT trades at $84.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AVT's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to AVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check AVT's competition here
ARW vs NSIT Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while NSIT trades at $117.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check NSIT's competition here
ARW vs CNXN Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CNXN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while CNXN trades at $78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CNXN's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNXN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to CNXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CNXN's competition here
ARW vs SCSC Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SCSC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while SCSC trades at $54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SCSC's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCSC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SCSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SCSC's competition here
ARW vs SNPO Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SNPO has a market cap of 822.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while SNPO trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SNPO's P/E ratio is -27.56. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SNPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SNPO's competition here
ARW vs CLMB Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CLMB has a market cap of 466.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while CLMB trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CLMB's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLMB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to CLMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CLMB's competition here
ARW vs INHD Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while INHD trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check INHD's competition here
ARW vs WSTG Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WSTG has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while WSTG trades at $31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WSTG's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WSTG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to WSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check WSTG's competition here
ARW vs ORBS Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while ORBS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check ORBS's competition here
ARW vs TAIT Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TAIT has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while TAIT trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TAIT's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAIT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to TAIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check TAIT's competition here
ARW vs IZM Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IZM has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while IZM trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IZM's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IZM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to IZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check IZM's competition here
ARW vs AEY Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AEY has a market cap of 538.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while AEY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AEY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to AEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check AEY's competition here
ARW vs CKP Comparison July 2026
ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $204.28, while CKP trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CKP's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to CKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CKP's competition here