Arrow Electronics, Inc.

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SNX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while SNX trades at $237.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas SNX's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SNX's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AVT has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while AVT trades at $85.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas AVT's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to AVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check AVT's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while NSIT trades at $97.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check NSIT's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CNXN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while CNXN trades at $66.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas CNXN's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNXN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to CNXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CNXN's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SCSC has a market cap of 896.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while SCSC trades at $44.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas SCSC's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCSC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SCSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SCSC's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SNPO has a market cap of 822.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while SNPO trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas SNPO's P/E ratio is -27.56. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to SNPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check SNPO's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CLMB has a market cap of 389.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while CLMB trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas CLMB's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLMB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to CLMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CLMB's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while ORBS trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check ORBS's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WSTG has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while WSTG trades at $31.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas WSTG's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WSTG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to WSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check WSTG's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TAIT has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while TAIT trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas TAIT's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAIT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to TAIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check TAIT's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IZM has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while IZM trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas IZM's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IZM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to IZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check IZM's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AEY has a market cap of 538.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while AEY trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas AEY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is less volatile compared to AEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check AEY's competition here

ARW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARW is priced at $217.33, while CKP trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.56, whereas CKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARW is more volatile compared to CKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARW.Check CKP's competition here