AppHarvest, Inc.
AppHarvest, Inc. APPHW Peers
See (APPHW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPHW | $0.01 | -99.44% | 10.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ADM | $48.34 | -0.61% | 23.2B | 17.02 | $2.84 | +4.18% |
| TSN | $55.36 | -0.82% | 19.3B | 21.54 | $2.57 | +3.58% |
| BG | $79.38 | +0.18% | 10.7B | 10.19 | $7.79 | +3.44% |
| SFD | $22.87 | -0.17% | 9B | 10.07 | $2.27 | +2.18% |
| AGRO | $9.48 | +0.11% | 4.7B | 10.53 | $0.90 | +3.67% |
| CALM | $93.45 | -2.17% | 4.5B | 4.60 | $20.33 | +7.21% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
| FDP | $34.46 | -0.66% | 1.7B | 11.30 | $3.05 | +3.20% |
| VITL | $31.78 | -4.10% | 1.4B | 28.38 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
APPHW vs ADM Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while ADM trades at $48.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs TSN Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while TSN trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs BG Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while BG trades at $79.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs SFD Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while SFD trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AGRO Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AGRO trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs CALM Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while CALM trades at $93.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs IBA Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs FDP Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while FDP trades at $34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs VITL Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while VITL trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs DOLE Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while DOLE trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs LND Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while LND trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs CHSCO Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while CHSCO trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs CHSCP Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while CHSCP trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs CHSCN Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 337.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while CHSCN trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs CHSCL Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 337.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while CHSCL trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs CHSCM Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while CHSCM trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs LMNR Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while LMNR trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LMNR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs ALCO Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while ALCO trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AFRI Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AFRI trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AGFS Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs VFF Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while VFF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs PME Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs LOCL Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while LOCL trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs DTCK Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while DTCK trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs SANW Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while SANW trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AFRIW Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AFRIW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs APPH Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs SDOT Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while SDOT trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs EDBLW Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while EDBLW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs EDBL Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while EDBL trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AGRI Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AGRI trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AQB Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AQB trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AQB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs KAL Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs KALWW Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AAGR Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 868K. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AAGR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AAGRW Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 315.5K. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.
APPHW vs AGRIW Comparison
APPHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPHW stands at 10.3M. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APPHW is priced at $0.01, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APPHW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APPHW is more volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPHW.