Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp.
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. API.CN Peers
See (API.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API.CN | CA$0.13 | +13.64% | 21M | -12.50 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | CA$97.40 | -3.69% | 42.4B | 170.89 | CA$0.57 | +0.16% |
| U-UN.TO | CA$24.79 | -2.78% | 7B | -3.92 | -CA$6.33 | N/A |
| NXE.TO | CA$9.21 | -2.64% | 5.2B | -54.18 | -CA$0.17 | N/A |
| DML.TO | CA$2.46 | -1.20% | 2.2B | -18.92 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
| EFR.TO | CA$8.54 | +8.51% | 1.9B | -14.47 | -CA$0.59 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | CA$0.72 | -2.70% | 618.3M | -72.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| URE.TO | CA$1.46 | +2.10% | 532.6M | -8.11 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| URC.TO | CA$3.43 | +0.59% | 458.4M | 85.75 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| MGA.TO | CA$0.28 | +0.00% | 105.4M | -5.60 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
API.CN vs CCO.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CCO.TO trades at CA$97.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 170.89. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs U-UN.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, U-UN.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while U-UN.TO trades at CA$24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas U-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to U-UN.TO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to U-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs NXE.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while NXE.TO trades at CA$9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -54.18. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs DML.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while DML.TO trades at CA$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs EFR.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, EFR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while EFR.TO trades at CA$8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas EFR.TO's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EFR.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to EFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs FCU.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while FCU.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs URE.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while URE.TO trades at CA$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs URC.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 458.4M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while URC.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 85.75. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs MGA.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, MGA.TO has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while MGA.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas MGA.TO's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to MGA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs LUR.CN Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while LUR.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs WUC.CN Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while WUC.CN trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs CAKE.CN Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while CAKE.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN and CAKE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
API.CN vs GREN.CN Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, GREN.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while GREN.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas GREN.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GREN.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN and GREN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
API.CN vs OBRN.CN Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while OBRN.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.
API.CN vs AZZ.TO Comparison
API.CN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, API.CN stands at 21M. In comparison, AZZ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, API.CN is priced at CA$0.13, while AZZ.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
API.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas AZZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, API.CN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZZ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, API.CN is less volatile compared to AZZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for API.CN.