Arista Networks, Inc.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 295.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 67.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while DELL trades at $96.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CAJPY has a market cap of 29.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CAJPY trades at $31.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CAJPY's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to CAJPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 29.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CAJFF trades at $31.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while HPQ trades at $26.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 21.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CAJ trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 20.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while STX trades at $96.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 19.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while NTAP trades at $94.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 18.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SMCI trades at $31.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 16.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while PSTG trades at $48.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 157.97. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 15.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while WDC trades at $44.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while ASUUY trades at $98.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while LNVGY trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 14.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while LNVGF trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while LOGI trades at $81.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 7.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while IONQ-WT trades at $20.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 7.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while IONQ trades at $31.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -20.45. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SEKEY trades at $6.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SEKEF trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while QBTS-WT trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of +45.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while QBTS trades at $10.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QBTS's ROE of +45.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while RGTI trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while RGTIW trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while TSHTY trades at $9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while LGNRF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CRCT trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while QUBT trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 798.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SSYS trades at $11.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 789.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CRSR trades at $7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 714.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while DRSHF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 81.75. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 585.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while WACMF trades at $4.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 584.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while JFEYF trades at $18.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 524.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while WACMY trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 515.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while RCAT trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 304.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while DDD trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DDD's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 260.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while NNDM trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 186.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CAN trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 175.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while ZSPC trades at $7.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while TIO trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while DM trades at $4.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while MICT trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MICT's ROE of -40.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while MKFG trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 76.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while XAARF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 75.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while INVE trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 74.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while QMCO trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 68.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while ALOT trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 67.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while YIBO trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while STRC trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 62.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while TBIIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 53.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while OSS trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 51.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while TAKOF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 47.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CREAF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 35.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while TACT trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while FATH trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 28.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while PRWYF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 24.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while EBON trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 24.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while KTCC trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 21.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while AITX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SGE trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 11.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while UAVS trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while VLD trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while EVRC trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SCKT trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while VJET trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CCUR trades at $1,876.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while VIDE trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VIDE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while VRTK trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 3.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while FNTTF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while STRCW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919322.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 632116.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while YRLLF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 504284.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while ITOX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 434614.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while DDDX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 204960.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 179869.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CRTG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123488.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while HAUP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82500.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while GOSY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GOSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 47963.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while EUOT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EUOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17721.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11252.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10437.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while NADA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NADA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 6957.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while VMRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2343.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while CBEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CBEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 1777.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while VOIS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while SOSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SOSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 132.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while MDEA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MDEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.

ANET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANET stands at 109.56B. In comparison, IWRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ANET is priced at $87.26, while IWRS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANET currently has a P/E ratio of 36.82, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANET's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANET is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANET.