Amazon.com, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZ.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMZ.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZ.DE | €182.26 | -0.40% | 2T | 29.26 | €6.23 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | €13.25 | -0.57% | 253.1B | 21.73 | €0.61 | +1.63% |
| AHLA.F | €105.60 | -1.31% | 251.6B | 21.55 | €4.89 | +1.61% |
| AHLA.DE | €105.40 | -1.31% | 244.6B | 21.55 | €4.89 | +1.60% |
| IXD1.DE | €50.70 | -1.05% | 158B | 25.35 | €2.00 | +2.66% |
| MLB1.DE | €1,490.20 | +0.89% | 75.5B | 43.42 | €34.32 | N/A |
| EBA.DE | €81.28 | +1.26% | 36.4B | 21.91 | €3.71 | +1.27% |
| 013A.F | €24.80 | -0.80% | 34B | 15.21 | €1.63 | +3.51% |
| ZAL.DE | €21.00 | -1.13% | 5.4B | 25.61 | €0.82 | N/A |
| DHER.DE | €16.57 | -0.78% | 5B | -8.91 | -€1.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMZ.DE vs 2RR.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 253.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 2RR.F trades at €13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 2RR.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs AHLA.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while AHLA.F trades at €105.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check AHLA.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs AHLA.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 244.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while AHLA.DE trades at €105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs IXD1.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while IXD1.DE trades at €50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check IXD1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs MLB1.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while MLB1.DE trades at €1,490.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs EBA.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while EBA.DE trades at €81.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check EBA.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 013A.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 013A.F trades at €24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 013A.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ZAL.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while ZAL.DE trades at €21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs DHER.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while DHER.DE trades at €16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check DHER.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 3E2.BE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 3E2.BE trades at €47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 3E2.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 3E2.F trades at €44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 3E2.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 3E2.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 3E2.DE trades at €44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ZO1.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs CEC.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while CEC.DE trades at €4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 421.50. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check CEC.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs YOU.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while YOU.DE trades at €6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check YOU.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs YOU.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while YOU.F trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check YOU.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs DOU.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, DOU.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while DOU.F trades at €10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas DOU.F's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOU.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to DOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check DOU.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 8WZ.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 732.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs SNH.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check SNH.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs G5NA.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs H24.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check H24.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 91N0.SG Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 91N0.SG has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while 91N0.SG trades at €16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas 91N0.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 91N0.SG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to 91N0.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 91N0.SG's competition here
AMZ.DE vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BIKE.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while BIKE.F trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BIKE.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BIKE.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -22.69. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs FSNT.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ART.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ART.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs MRX.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while MRX.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check MRX.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs MRX.F Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while MRX.F trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check MRX.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BBY.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BBY.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ECF.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while ECF.DE trades at €2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -44.80. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ECF.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ADD.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ADD.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs WDL1.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, WDL1.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while WDL1.DE trades at €0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas WDL1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDL1.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to WDL1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check WDL1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BTBB.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs CEC1.DE Comparison April 2026
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €182.26, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 29.26, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check CEC1.DE's competition here