Amazon.com, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZ.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMZ.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZ.DE | €186.72 | -8.56% | 2T | 34.77 | €5.37 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | €12.59 | -3.76% | 241.8B | 15.63 | €0.81 | +0.11% |
| AHLA.F | €101.00 | -3.81% | 241.7B | 15.70 | €6.46 | +0.91% |
| IXD1.DE | €41.54 | -2.35% | 129.3B | 22.10 | €1.88 | +3.14% |
| MLB1.DE | €2,054.50 | -1.18% | 104.2B | 58.30 | €35.24 | N/A |
| 013A.F | €26.75 | -3.08% | 39.5B | 7.49 | €3.56 | +3.29% |
| EBA.DE | €77.72 | -3.39% | 35.8B | 19.78 | €3.93 | +1.33% |
| AHLA.DE | €100.80 | -3.63% | 30.1B | 15.58 | €6.47 | +0.11% |
| DHER.DE | €25.65 | -2.43% | 7.6B | -8.27 | -€3.10 | N/A |
| ZAL.DE | €24.96 | -2.95% | 6.5B | 24.23 | €1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMZ.DE vs 2RR.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while 2RR.F trades at €12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 2RR.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs AHLA.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 241.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while AHLA.F trades at €101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check AHLA.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs IXD1.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while IXD1.DE trades at €41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check IXD1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs MLB1.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while MLB1.DE trades at €2,054.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 013A.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while 013A.F trades at €26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 013A.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs EBA.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while EBA.DE trades at €77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check EBA.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs AHLA.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while AHLA.DE trades at €100.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs DHER.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while DHER.DE trades at €25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check DHER.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ZAL.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while ZAL.DE trades at €24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 3E2.BE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while 3E2.BE trades at €50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 3E2.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while 3E2.F trades at €50.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 3E2.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 3E2.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while 3E2.DE trades at €40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ZO1.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs CEC.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while CEC.DE trades at €4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is -49.33. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check CEC.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs YOU.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while YOU.F trades at €6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check YOU.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs YOU.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while YOU.DE trades at €6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check YOU.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs 8WZ.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 739.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs SNH.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check SNH.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs G5NA.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs H24.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check H24.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BIKE.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BIKE.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while BIKE.F trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BIKE.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs FSNT.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs MRX.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while MRX.DE trades at €1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check MRX.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ART.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -80.71. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ART.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs MRX.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while MRX.F trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check MRX.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs ECF.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while ECF.DE trades at €2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check ECF.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BBY.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BBY.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs BTBB.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
AMZ.DE vs U1DA.F Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, U1DA.F has a market cap of 165.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while U1DA.F trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas U1DA.F's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to U1DA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to U1DA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check U1DA.F's competition here
AMZ.DE vs CEC1.DE Comparison August 2025
AMZ.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZ.DE stands at 2T. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMZ.DE is priced at €186.72, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 34.77, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, AMZ.DE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZ.DE is less volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZ.DE.Check CEC1.DE's competition here